Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
BBC 509cid tunnel ram efi build. >

BBC 509cid tunnel ram efi build.

Notices

BBC 509cid tunnel ram efi build.

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-01-2024, 08:51 PM
  #11  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
Rookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 5,706
Received 1,212 Likes on 583 Posts
Default

Not a bad cam. I don't believe your exhaust ports flow enough for 5° split. I run 6° (237°/243°) but my heads have been extensively ported and flow 300+ @ 0.650"
Rookie is offline  
Old 04-02-2024, 05:07 AM
  #12  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 535
Received 129 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rookie
Not a bad cam. I don't believe your exhaust ports flow enough for 5° split. I run 6° (237°/243°) but my heads have been extensively ported and flow 300+ @ 0.650"
+300 @650 for exhaust? wow! Floteks flows, int 340cfm @650", exh 270cfm @650". I/E ratio is almost 80%.
JaniH is offline  
Old 04-02-2024, 01:50 PM
  #13  
GPM
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 2,664
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

It looks like the 290s drop off after .600 lift, what is the point in going with a .650 lift cam.
GPM is offline  
Old 04-02-2024, 03:37 PM
  #14  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 535
Received 129 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GPM
It looks like the 290s drop off after .600 lift, what is the point in going with a .650 lift cam.
Flow numbers at flotek site are advertised too high. Check Eric Weingrtner video @ yuotube if yuo are interested. peak flow at 0.700" lift, untouched.
JaniH is offline  
Old 04-02-2024, 03:44 PM
  #15  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 535
Received 129 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

Review for stock 290cc

Modified 290cc
JaniH is offline  
Old 04-02-2024, 05:53 PM
  #16  
GPM
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 2,664
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Why would you use those on a 509
GPM is offline  
Old 04-02-2024, 06:53 PM
  #17  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: taxachusetts
Posts: 3,100
Received 701 Likes on 355 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GPM
Why would you use those on a 509
if you believe flotech's flow charts,they flow really well.
sutphen 30 is offline  
Old 04-03-2024, 01:40 PM
  #18  
GPM
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pa
Posts: 2,664
Received 80 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sutphen 30
if you believe flotech's flow charts,they flow really well.
I don't, but what are you comparing them to ? they still seem small for a 509 that may get a supercharger. There again, that's only my opinion.
GPM is offline  
Old 04-04-2024, 04:51 AM
  #19  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 535
Received 129 Likes on 83 Posts
Default

Here is comparison of the valve timing events of all the cams i have mentioned in this thread. Looking only the duration, the Sporl perfomance cam looks most agressive, but because the wider 114lsa its lil milder than the crane 741.

From left to right in the picture.
-Custom 230/236,112lsa
-Comp 236/236,112lsa
-Sporl 240/245, 114lsa
-Crane 741. 236/244, 112lsa



JaniH is offline  
Old 04-05-2024, 04:39 AM
  #20  
SB
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,562
Received 3,131 Likes on 1,408 Posts
Default

What id it about the cam, that you are you calling it ‘milder’ ? The 114 vs 112 lsa ? Did you miss the rest of the #’ when comparing ?
SB is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.