Sunkin Ejection Stories
#732
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
I wont be posting over there as well, I see no reason to help Chris!! If he would have come out and admitted what he did , but he took the cowards way out!
#733
VIP Member
VIP Member
LMAO, first off I would never even think of going back there for a number of reasons. When I left, and came back here nothing had changed, it was like I was never gone, which is because I never burned any bridges here.
Secondly, Heather and IB have done many great things here in the past few months to make this site everything possibly needed for my internet boating needs. For that I thank them and will continue to reward them with my content.
Thirdly, Chris Sunkin is still a lying thieving Piece of crap, who has never admitted to all the lies or the thievery, he just will sit back in the shadows while everyone has fun and the site bilks money from advertisers and tries to get people to pay for memberships. Troutly never molested my kid, but I sure wouldn't let him babysit.
Lastly Stecz, Go phuck yourself, you better watch throwing that friend word around, we WERE friends, you took a liar and a thief's word over mine. You are no friend, you are trying to make that site come around for a payday, well maybe you should have listened to me a year ago when I warned you he was no good. You don't deserve to have me as a friend.... you haven't called me once to try to smooth things over...tool
Secondly, Heather and IB have done many great things here in the past few months to make this site everything possibly needed for my internet boating needs. For that I thank them and will continue to reward them with my content.
Thirdly, Chris Sunkin is still a lying thieving Piece of crap, who has never admitted to all the lies or the thievery, he just will sit back in the shadows while everyone has fun and the site bilks money from advertisers and tries to get people to pay for memberships. Troutly never molested my kid, but I sure wouldn't let him babysit.
Lastly Stecz, Go phuck yourself, you better watch throwing that friend word around, we WERE friends, you took a liar and a thief's word over mine. You are no friend, you are trying to make that site come around for a payday, well maybe you should have listened to me a year ago when I warned you he was no good. You don't deserve to have me as a friend.... you haven't called me once to try to smooth things over...tool
Last edited by offshoredrillin; 06-10-2010 at 06:17 PM.
#735
Charter Member #232
Charter Member
#736
Charter Member #232
Charter Member
#737
VIP Member
VIP Member
#738
Registered
If the site is not his to sell why dont you contact the "real" owners and find out what they have to say about what is going on.
I think someone said that the "whois" records suggest that he doesnt own it, but someone else and "whois" itself says that the information is provided "as is" with no warranty or guarantee about accuracy.
For someone who doesnt "own" the site he seems have a fair amount of control over it. It would seem illogical that he has all this apparent power over the site yet he doesn't own it. So if he doesnt own the site what is he? manager?
I think someone said that the "whois" records suggest that he doesnt own it, but someone else and "whois" itself says that the information is provided "as is" with no warranty or guarantee about accuracy.
For someone who doesnt "own" the site he seems have a fair amount of control over it. It would seem illogical that he has all this apparent power over the site yet he doesn't own it. So if he doesnt own the site what is he? manager?
#739
Registered
If the site is not his to sell why dont you contact the "real" owners and find out what they have to say about what is going on.
I think someone said that the "whois" records suggest that he doesnt own it, but someone else and "whois" itself says that the information is provided "as is" with no warranty or guarantee about accuracy.
For someone who doesnt "own" the site he seems have a fair amount of control over it. It would seem illogical that he has all this apparent power over the site yet he doesn't own it. So if he doesnt own the site what is he? manager?
I think someone said that the "whois" records suggest that he doesnt own it, but someone else and "whois" itself says that the information is provided "as is" with no warranty or guarantee about accuracy.
For someone who doesnt "own" the site he seems have a fair amount of control over it. It would seem illogical that he has all this apparent power over the site yet he doesn't own it. So if he doesnt own the site what is he? manager?