VtSteve

I think they did try to go after it, and offered up what amounts to a generous offer. At that time, they didn't know that CS couldn't deliver to them what wasn't even his.. At least, that's what it seems to be given the references to Grindstone. One would think that if this outside guy did in fact own it, and was owed money by CS, that he'd just pull the plug, or simply take away the keys.

At any rate, nobody sincerely believes that CS is not still doing his thing there. There once was a reason for the founders to start the site, and that impetus is now gone. Someone over at SOS recently stated that it's no good without the photographers and tech guys. Since they're here.............

I might add, some of the additional lies by CS this week alone make the list of lies too lengthy to keep track of. Since they are on so many different levels, and so many different topics, I'd have to say he's in the top three that I've ever seen anywhere. You'd have to be a pretty "special" person to be able to work with him keeping a straight face.

boatlessatm

Why arent you contacting the real owner of the site then? Surely that would be the easiest way to get rid of him once and for all.

Catastrophe

Attempted....no response.

cosmic12

Morning Alec, got the message...............................

BUIZILLA

Alec... who IS the real owner?

Comanche3Six

SOS will always be a cultlike website, with a bunch of sheep Baa Baaing along to Sunkins tune. In an open website the members can post a little true controversy without fear of repercussion or deleted posts, just because they don't agree with that bag of chit. I hope it collapses soon.

DollaBill

I'm going to the addy listed on the who-is today

Interceptor

I was critical of a post made by the Serious Adminstrator and later got a P.M. from Stecz where he agreed with me then my original post was deleted.
I've posted a few times since the notice of change, in fact I'm in a discussion there now regarding post count and content. I'd like to see the site survive with new clear management but with the economy we're in it's a bad time for start up web sites and that's what SOS is in my mind, a start up web site with limited viewership.
ed

MacGyver

I think my sig line is better. Well I can't have an actual sig line here since I'm not a paying member. But I can kinda sorta make it look like a sig line.


_______________
• • • ▬ ▬ ▬ • • •

Catastrophe

The mathematics attached to SOS currently, both in activity stats and viability of existence, make it a very bad businees deal for any potential advertiser.

To buy an annual banner ad, one has to believe that the exposure will actually last a year.
If bang for the buck doesnt matter to the advertiser then it doesnt matter to them that only 30banner ads were clicked on in the month of May 2010.

If they dont mind getting their money back if the site closes shortly then maybe they will do it just to show support, thats if they want to live with showing support to an individual that has stolen from a charity and a list of other significant stupid crap.

Who would the advertiser be supporting?? 25 people living on the Post Whore thread.

I will reimburse anyone that joins tonight as a member and pays with paypal and comes on here and tells everyone whose paypal account collected his money.

There is no new ownership. Its all BS.

Anyone joining that site wears supporting Chris Sunkin.