Mistress repower #2 begins....
#841
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh
Posts: 11,639
Likes: 0
Received 209 Likes
on
133 Posts
Bob said to me that 685-700 should be easy to see now the thing is at 6000 that may happen but if I can't get them to 6000 in boat what's the point? I should have kept the stimp puller cams I had because the old engines only made 598 hp and 660 tq boat went faster with those...
As far as changes I don't see much of any due to cash flow... Advancing or retarding cams I am told will not increase anything enough to bother with it..
Might see it on dyno but not in the boat.
As far as changes I don't see much of any due to cash flow... Advancing or retarding cams I am told will not increase anything enough to bother with it..
Might see it on dyno but not in the boat.
#843
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I have no hard feeling with you bro!! I think your cam will be fine, little big but its not to crazy, I bet it will make power to around 6500 on the dyno. The spring is eating up a little power too, but it's not 200lbs anymore they lose about 20-25lbs after you break them in. I would drop down to a 170lb spring, that will be right at 145-150 after break in.
That seems like a lot of spring to run for 200+ hours before replacing lifters. You might want to change them out at 100-125hrs to be safe.
You can alway drop to a 1.6 or 1.5 ratio rocker to take some lift away (assuming that is the spec with 1.7)
That seems like a lot of spring to run for 200+ hours before replacing lifters. You might want to change them out at 100-125hrs to be safe.
You can alway drop to a 1.6 or 1.5 ratio rocker to take some lift away (assuming that is the spec with 1.7)
#845
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But Yes if I was doing that cam with bob I would have probably kept it around 232/236 .650 lift..... (From the top of my head without researching all your data) I have always made better power going to the smaller side of the cam than the larger for the application.
#846
Registered
Bob said to me that 685-700 should be easy to see now the thing is at 6000 that may happen but if I can't get them to 6000 in boat what's the point? I should have kept the stimp puller cams I had because the old engines only made 598 hp and 660 tq boat went faster with those...
As far as changes I don't see much of any due to cash flow... Advancing or retarding cams I am told will not increase anything enough to bother with it..
Might see it on dyno but not in the boat.
As far as changes I don't see much of any due to cash flow... Advancing or retarding cams I am told will not increase anything enough to bother with it..
Might see it on dyno but not in the boat.
#847
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats why its even more important to have the right combination of parts from the beginning. My old engines made 850HP and when I rebuilt them I had new cams made that were 15 degrees smaller as well as a few other changes and made 75hp more. In the water the boat runs the old top speed 600 rpm sooner with a lot more still in it.
#848
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh
Posts: 11,639
Likes: 0
Received 209 Likes
on
133 Posts
Right which is why I am not gonna change until refresh time. The money isn't there I just pulled valve covers to check things and all looks fine so far, no beating of the valves at this point so I gotta just run it
#850
Registered
I thought Brian and bob where partners in a company? Am I wrong? Not trying to start anything just the way Brian was always talking that is how it came across.