SCX or SCX-4
#11
Registered
Thread Starter
Frickstyle-
Thanks for the input, and yes the boat will be run on Lake Michigan.
I need to get the boat up to Michigan so I can get more specifics on the prop shaft depth. I believe it is even with the hull, but I'm going off memory. Sticking with the SCX upper would be easier, as I could change things in stages. Going to the -4, it all needs to be done at once. However, I want to set it up the right way, not the cheapest way. I can run 6 props on either set up, I just need to figure out if the extra -2" is needed/ beneficial.
Thanks for the input, and yes the boat will be run on Lake Michigan.
I need to get the boat up to Michigan so I can get more specifics on the prop shaft depth. I believe it is even with the hull, but I'm going off memory. Sticking with the SCX upper would be easier, as I could change things in stages. Going to the -4, it all needs to be done at once. However, I want to set it up the right way, not the cheapest way. I can run 6 props on either set up, I just need to figure out if the extra -2" is needed/ beneficial.
#12
Registered
Frickstyle-
Thanks for the input, and yes the boat will be run on Lake Michigan.
I need to get the boat up to Michigan so I can get more specifics on the prop shaft depth. I believe it is even with the hull, but I'm going off memory. Sticking with the SCX upper would be easier, as I could change things in stages. Going to the -4, it all needs to be done at once. However, I want to set it up the right way, not the cheapest way. I can run 6 props on either set up, I just need to figure out if the extra -2" is needed/ beneficial.
Thanks for the input, and yes the boat will be run on Lake Michigan.
I need to get the boat up to Michigan so I can get more specifics on the prop shaft depth. I believe it is even with the hull, but I'm going off memory. Sticking with the SCX upper would be easier, as I could change things in stages. Going to the -4, it all needs to be done at once. However, I want to set it up the right way, not the cheapest way. I can run 6 props on either set up, I just need to figure out if the extra -2" is needed/ beneficial.
I can tell you what "experimenting" gets you - because I could probably have a 39 at this point with what I've spent on converting and redoing this old rig....
#13
VIP Member
VIP Member
Frickstyle-
Thanks for the input, and yes the boat will be run on Lake Michigan.
I need to get the boat up to Michigan so I can get more specifics on the prop shaft depth. I believe it is even with the hull, but I'm going off memory. Sticking with the SCX upper would be easier, as I could change things in stages. Going to the -4, it all needs to be done at once. However, I want to set it up the right way, not the cheapest way. I can run 6 props on either set up, I just need to figure out if the extra -2" is needed/ beneficial.
Thanks for the input, and yes the boat will be run on Lake Michigan.
I need to get the boat up to Michigan so I can get more specifics on the prop shaft depth. I believe it is even with the hull, but I'm going off memory. Sticking with the SCX upper would be easier, as I could change things in stages. Going to the -4, it all needs to be done at once. However, I want to set it up the right way, not the cheapest way. I can run 6 props on either set up, I just need to figure out if the extra -2" is needed/ beneficial.
#14
Registered
Thread Starter
I think the SCX only comes in a -2, I'm sure only the SC is available in a -3. The biggest problem with a -3 if they made one is its going to limit your prop size by 1/2" with the SCX. If a 16.5" cleaver will fit in an SCX with an SCX lower, then that will probably be the way I go, but I want to talk a few people that have one of these combos first.
#15
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
I think the SCX only comes in a -2, I'm sure only the SC is available in a -3. The biggest problem with a -3 if they made one is its going to limit your prop size by 1/2" with the SCX. If a 16.5" cleaver will fit in an SCX with an SCX lower, then that will probably be the way I go, but I want to talk a few people that have one of these combos first.
#16
VIP Member
VIP Member
You can run current tech cleavers on Sportmaster and "Bravo Style" https://www.mercuryracing.com/boat-p...d-cnc-cleaver/
#18
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
#20
Registered
I wouldn’t mess with an sc lower, not in big water with good power in front of it, unless you want max speed with an scx upper. I’d go scx-4 with #6 shaft. Get the big bullet as high out of the water as possible. You could go scx 4 with 1-1/4 shaft and use adapter to test cleavers and switch to #6 shaft when you find right setup, then blue print lowers while guts are out, but you’d probably have to mess with spacers for bravo style props and no spacers for cleavers then. There are props out there to test. There are cons to cleaver props but pros outweigh them. Hate to say it but maybe run it for a year as is?
Hard to beat this view, at least on what started life as bravo boat
Hard to beat this view, at least on what started life as bravo boat
The following users liked this post: