Cigarette adventure (new transoM and #6 conversion)
#61
Registered
If it was a car you'd ditch the intercooler and go E-85.
The following users liked this post:
hogie roll (10-19-2022)
#63
Registered
Dan, I’m pretty sure that tunnel rams perform their best in N/A or nitrous applications. I don’t think you will see much if any decrease in power in a boosted application running a traditional blower manifold.
The following users liked this post:
Knot 4 Me (10-19-2022)
#66
Registered
Thread Starter
This is without the mounting plate which is 3/4" , so id need to lose about 1.5" somewhere .. and really the rest of the blower is clearanced fine.. it`s the rear left corner that the problem as the hatch bows down, the rest of the blower has good clearance where the hatch is higher
#67
Registered
Thread Starter
My fabricator is not keen on milling the top of the intake (plenty of side wall) and welding the mounting place to it , then mill the plate to take out any warpage and less material..
That was my idea.
I`m told the weld would not be strong enough.
That was my idea.
I`m told the weld would not be strong enough.
#68
Registered
#69
Registered
Can you get away with a slight modification to your hatch in the effected area like a old school cowl induction hood or something with just a slight flare to give you clearance?
How much difference is your hatch in height to the 90mph cigs?
How much difference is your hatch in height to the 90mph cigs?
#70
Registered
Thread Starter
The blower would stick out right about where the rib/supports are.. low profile cowls is a good idea but would ruin the logo .
Mine is a bit shorter it looks like.
pretty sure I`ll just go whipple port injected manifolds , take the loss on these and move on with my life.
Mine is a bit shorter it looks like.
pretty sure I`ll just go whipple port injected manifolds , take the loss on these and move on with my life.