Notices

Dyno Results: 502 w/ AFRs

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-15-2014, 10:22 AM
  #41  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cole2534
I wonder if the the factory EFI from a '96 502 mag would support that HP?
I don't believe so. Maybe after some extrude honing and what not you might get close .
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 05-15-2014, 11:26 AM
  #42  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: AZ
Posts: 1,014
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Was this a 18726543 firing order?
Borgie is offline  
Old 05-15-2014, 11:55 AM
  #43  
SB
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,619
Received 3,166 Likes on 1,430 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cole2534
I wonder if the the factory EFI from a '96 502 mag would support that HP?
No. Even the 500EFI has a hard time with this HP.

MPI has a good intake for a tow truck.
SB is offline  
Old 05-15-2014, 12:00 PM
  #44  
SB
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,619
Received 3,166 Likes on 1,430 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rookie
I by no means am an expert at reading dyno paperwork. But isn't the low (lean) 0.39-0.42 BSFC in the heart of the torque curve making anyone else a little nervous? Not an expert, but that is where I was told to be concerned.
BSFC is not really a good measurement of lean or rich. Yes, it's #'s can be swayed by lean or rich but that, again, is not the true nature of BSFC.

It is how much fuel it takes to make each HP.

Peak torque usaully has lower BSFC's then rest of the rpm curve because that's when the engine is usually most effecient....thus the peak torque.
SB is offline  
Old 05-15-2014, 12:33 PM
  #45  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Great Sacandaga Lake, NY
Posts: 1,261
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by SB
No. Even the 500EFI has a hard time with this HP.
.
My 500 EFI with Cam similar to a Crane 741, 315 cnc AFRs, 9.6:1 JEs made 572hp @ 5400.
BTW was a 509

Last edited by Rattlesnake Jake; 05-15-2014 at 12:39 PM.
Rattlesnake Jake is offline  
Old 05-15-2014, 12:47 PM
  #46  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rattlesnake Jake
My 500 EFI with Cam similar to a Crane 741, 315 cnc AFRs, 9.6:1 JEs made 572hp @ 5400.
BTW was a 509
The intake was prob costing you some power. A full cnc head with that cam, shoulda did a little better than that. The 525 almost makes that with similar cam, cast edelbrock heads and less compression.

Either way still a big gain from stock 500EFI. The OP engine has as cast 305 heads
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 05-15-2014, 12:53 PM
  #47  
SB
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,619
Received 3,166 Likes on 1,430 Posts
Default

MT , Different Dyno SAE standards, but that was another thread. Regular 607 Standards and would be 600 plus/minus a few.

Anyhow, well known, looking for 600+ time to move on to something else. Holley Single Plane EFI intakes get nod by many at this point.
SB is offline  
Old 05-15-2014, 03:54 PM
  #48  
Registered
 
Rookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 5,753
Received 1,249 Likes on 604 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SB
BSFC is not really a good measurement of lean or rich. Yes, it's #'s can be swayed by lean or rich but that, again, is not the true nature of BSFC.

It is how much fuel it takes to make each HP.

Peak torque usaully has lower BSFC's then rest of the rpm curve because that's when the engine is usually most effecient....thus the peak torque.
I was also correlating it to the High AFR's that is saying that it is lean. Almost stoichiometric burn.
Rookie is offline  
Old 05-15-2014, 04:23 PM
  #49  
SB
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,619
Received 3,166 Likes on 1,430 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rookie
I was also correlating it to the High AFR's that is saying that it is lean. Almost stoichiometric burn.
Me comprendo.

Issue with the A/F readings on this sheet along with a million other sheets that the dyno does not read A/F Ratio from wideband is that they are wrong. Suks huh ?

When dyno's don't use a wideband they calculate A/F ratio from air entered thru the Airflow Meter Hat vs the fuel going thru the fuel flow meter.

Not exact by any means. Many dyno's I have been at with both have showd Wideband reading of 12.8-13.0 while the Airflow Meter Vs Fuel Flow Reading showing well into the 14.0's.

Even though widebands can throw you for a loop once in a while , this really shows how important Widebands have been in all our lives.

FYI: I am assuming his #'s are not wideband because I mentioned it earlier and was not told otherwise #1, and #2, who would leave a dyno seesion with those #'s. LOL.
SB is offline  
Old 05-15-2014, 04:27 PM
  #50  
SB
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,619
Received 3,166 Likes on 1,430 Posts
Default

I would like to mention, while on the subject of BSFC's, be very warry of other dyno sheets floating around internet land where all are in the .300's. Very, very good chance it's because of inflated power #'s.

Remember, BSFC is derived from how much fuel per horsepower an engine uses. It is a measurement of effeciency only. If the fuel use remains the same but the HP magically is up, the result is very low and quite unobtainable (in the real world) BSFC's.
SB is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.