Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Fountain
Would a 42 be faster with only aft tanks full? >

Would a 42 be faster with only aft tanks full?

Notices

Would a 42 be faster with only aft tanks full?

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-14-2006, 09:05 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Would a 42 be faster with only aft tanks full?

I have a 42 Ex and usually only fill up the larger forward tanks, keeping only 20 gallons or so in the rear tanks to use as a "reserve", but I wonder if the boat would carry the bow higher and thus be faster if I did it the other way around?
Memphis is offline  
Old 10-15-2006, 08:39 AM
  #2  
Registered
 
FeverMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Tampa
Posts: 6,665
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Re: Would a 42 be faster with only aft tanks full?

Yes!
FeverMike is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 03:46 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: IN & KY
Posts: 210
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Would a 42 be faster with only aft tanks full?

I have an 2001 with 575s and I was discussing speed. I was always 2 mph off, and I was told by a very good source that the rear tanks should always be used and the fronts as reserve only - run them down almost dry. This amounts to 2 mph difference. I have one of the big step bottoms that supposedly has a lot of stern lift.
BKSAE is offline  
Old 10-16-2006, 10:32 PM
  #4  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Memphis, TN
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Would a 42 be faster with only aft tanks full?

Looking forward to testing this theory the next time I am out on the boat.
Memphis is offline  
Old 10-17-2006, 07:44 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
LongShot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: St. Pete Beach, FL
Posts: 314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Would a 42 be faster with only aft tanks full?

Good question,

I see the fuel tanks are something like 250 - 260 gallons in the main tank and 25 - 30 gallons in each of the saddle bag tanks. 310 gallons is plenty of fuel for a performance boat with twins. I would think 250 - 260 gallons should be enough fuel for any poker run or cruise to the Keys.

What if you took both of the saddle tanks out and used them for fender storage in the bilge and use the main tank for fuel? You would lose around 500 lbs off the boat without the additional saddle bag tanks full of fuel.

How about making the cabin a poker run half cabin and a zipper front v - berth for storage?

Also, I asked a question about the 42's with the Merc ITS & Sportmaster drives and no one answered the question. Does this application work on the 42's or is the step to aggressive?
LongShot is offline  
Old 10-18-2006, 05:05 AM
  #6  
Registered
 
Back4More's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Lake Michigan
Posts: 6,627
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Would a 42 be faster with only aft tanks full?

I have a friend with a 97 42 with trips.
When he fills up, he tops off all 4 tanks, then runs the main tanks down halfway(when the gauges start moving off Full to 3/4) he then drains the saddles down into the mains.
He has had the boat for 6-7 years or so.
Back4More is offline  
Old 10-18-2006, 12:31 PM
  #7  
BZ
Registered
 
BZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Evergreen Park Il
Posts: 2,120
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default Re: Would a 42 be faster with only aft tanks full?

I just bought a new 42 EX and was told to just keep 15-20 gal a piece in the rear and run off the fronts all of the time. This will increase stern lift??? seems to have worked so far I can't Imagine trying to run all day by filling up the rears all of the time just to keep the fuel/weight out of the front of the boat.....BZ
BZ is offline  
Old 10-18-2006, 01:55 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Downtown42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 1 Flu Ovr KuKos Nest-WI
Posts: 9,950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Would a 42 be faster with only aft tanks full?

I think the 4 tanks is 250 total.
Downtown42 is offline  
Old 10-18-2006, 05:53 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
tomtbone1993's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: LAKE CONROE, TX
Posts: 15,491
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default Re: Would a 42 be faster with only aft tanks full?

Originally Posted by Bob Zubik
I just bought a new 42 EX and was told to just keep 15-20 gal a piece in the rear and run off the fronts all of the time. This will increase stern lift??? seems to have worked so far I can't Imagine trying to run all day by filling up the rears all of the time just to keep the fuel/weight out of the front of the boat.....BZ


Thats what I do, and I have 6 tanks. I have been thinking about removing the saddle tanks. T
tomtbone1993 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
iamfaster
Scarab
11
01-30-2007 01:08 AM
382 newbie
Formula
5
09-26-2006 08:31 PM
DORaymond
General Q & A
21
10-21-2005 11:11 PM
Dregsz
Banana Boat
1
08-30-2005 09:19 AM
bucky
General Boating Discussion
29
10-23-2002 08:18 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Quick Reply: Would a 42 be faster with only aft tanks full?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.