Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Fountain
2003 32 W/6.2 LS3's >

2003 32 W/6.2 LS3's

Notices

2003 32 W/6.2 LS3's

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-20-2016, 07:08 PM
  #11  
Registered
 
donzi matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Moultonborough NH
Posts: 1,355
Received 28 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

The 6.2 LS motor was not available until 2007, so if these are original motors, they are 377 small blocks.
donzi matt is offline  
Old 03-20-2016, 07:35 PM
  #12  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
 
blownincome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Epping N.H.
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by donzi matt
The 6.2 LS motor was not available until 2007, so if these are original motors, they are 377 small blocks.
Thank you then they are stroker 5.7 vortec's now for the questions only someone who has one can answer ... Lol
blownincome is offline  
Old 03-21-2016, 02:08 PM
  #13  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Central IL / Green Bay, WI
Posts: 1,119
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Merc has *never* made an LS based marine engine.
Wasted Income is offline  
Old 03-21-2016, 07:50 PM
  #14  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
 
blownincome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Epping N.H.
Posts: 1,657
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Got the water test sheet today 71 at 5300
Rpm trim at 5 with 26 p Mirage inward I'm happy with that
blownincome is offline  
Old 03-21-2016, 08:39 PM
  #15  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Merritt Island, FL
Posts: 6,729
Received 1,389 Likes on 776 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by blownincome
Got the water test sheet today 71 at 5300
Rpm trim at 5 with 26 p Mirage inward I'm happy with that
I really wonder how these would be with some 500-600 HP all aluminum LS motors in them. It would have to give them much better balance.
Wildman_grafix is offline  
Old 03-22-2016, 07:29 AM
  #16  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 67
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I can give you a bit of insight based in my setup. I'm one of the few that have a 29 with twin 350 mags. It's a great setup. Gets on plane very quick and there is actually room to do maintenance. I know most of the 32s had big blocks and sat very heavy in the rear causing some transom leaks. I would think twin 6.2s would be much lighter and sit up a bit in the rear. It's a trade off for me in the long run. Single big block 29s run 70-74mph stock. Twin small block 29s run 67-70mph. For me the long run life of twin small blocks, being able to repair both engines or maintenance for the price of one "nothing broke but it's time for a 525 top end job", ability to back in to a dock with the control of twins is all good for me. Even if my boat did 78 there are plant of boats on my lake that will still smoke my a** at 100+. So overall I think the 32 with twin 6.2s is a real nice package and has its advantages if your ok not having a 80+ mph big block boat.
LKNCOBALT is offline  
Old 04-10-2016, 10:34 AM
  #17  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My 32 Fever is a 2005 and has 6.2 Mercury Racing Scorpion 377's. They are 377hp, forged roller internals but not LS engines. That boat could also have 6.2 Mercury engines that are not forged internals and rated at 320hp. My water test sheet shows 76mph but I've never seen that at 2000ft.

http://www.rosegarage.com/Fountain/scorpions.jpg

Last edited by Paralyzer; 04-10-2016 at 10:40 AM.
Paralyzer is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.