Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
"Thank *goodness* I was not wearing my safety/kill switch lanyard!" >

"Thank *goodness* I was not wearing my safety/kill switch lanyard!"

Notices

"Thank *goodness* I was not wearing my safety/kill switch lanyard!"

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-09-2006, 11:48 AM
  #51  
Registered
 
dhlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Smyrna Beach, Florida
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: "Thank *goodness* I was not wearing my safety/kill switch lanyard!"

I have developed a new testing procedure........

http://media.putfile.com/ejection
dhlaw is offline  
Old 05-09-2006, 11:50 AM
  #52  
Registered
 
Chris288's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: NY
Posts: 4,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: "Thank *goodness* I was not wearing my safety/kill switch lanyard!"

Guy here on the hudson hit a wave in his 25 outlaw, bounced out onto his bow and into the drink, boat circled for about 45 minutes nearly taking him out as well as a bunch of moored blow-boats before she over-heated and stalled.
Chris288 is offline  
Old 05-09-2006, 11:57 AM
  #53  
Registered
 
formula31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: ohio
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: "Thank *goodness* I was not wearing my safety/kill switch lanyard!"

Interesting debate. Personal freedoms vrs public responsibility. It sounds wayyy too much like a liberal cause for my taste. You dont really care about the people who might be killed, you're concern is for your own pocket book and your belief that any boat wreck is going to raise your insurance premiums. "lets all restrict everyones freedoms so that our insurance premiums go down" Not likely. Check out the statistics, boating safety improves almost every year. They are going to raise our premiums until we stop paying them. This is a replay of the "pics of people boating in a poker run without jackets on are going to raise our premiums" thread.
formula31 is offline  
Old 05-09-2006, 11:58 AM
  #54  
Forum Regulator
VIP Member
Thread Starter
 
Sydwayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 23,885
Received 1,260 Likes on 550 Posts
Default Re: "Thank *goodness* I was not wearing my safety/kill switch lanyard!"

Originally Posted by dhlaw
I have developed a new testing procedure........

http://media.putfile.com/ejection
Totally different situation. Brett later explained they were in the middle of a race, and it was not convenient to pull into the pits or find a porta-potty. They both REALLY had to go pee, and did not want make a mess in the boat. Self ejection was the quickest means to relief.
Sydwayz is offline  
Old 05-09-2006, 12:02 PM
  #55  
Registered
 
dhlaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New Smyrna Beach, Florida
Posts: 2,697
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: "Thank *goodness* I was not wearing my safety/kill switch lanyard!"

Actually, I was kicking Tyler Crocketts ass so bad I felt guilty and tossed myself out of the boat so that he would not have hurt feelings...........
dhlaw is offline  
Old 05-09-2006, 12:04 PM
  #56  
Forum Regulator
VIP Member
Thread Starter
 
Sydwayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 23,885
Received 1,260 Likes on 550 Posts
Default Re: "Thank *goodness* I was not wearing my safety/kill switch lanyard!"

Originally Posted by formula31
Interesting debate. Personal freedoms vrs public responsibility. It sounds wayyy too much like a liberal cause for my taste. You dont really care about the people who might be killed, you're concern is for your own pocket book and your belief that any boat wreck is going to raise your insurance premiums. "lets all restrict everyones freedoms so that our insurance premiums go down" Not likely. Check out the statistics, boating safety improves almost every year. They are going to raise our premiums until we stop paying them. This is a replay of the "pics of people boating in a poker run without jackets on are going to raise our premiums" thread.
Not true Tom. I am definately more concerned with public safety than I am the insurance issue, but both are valid points. My main point is that if a 3-second task (if that) of enabling your boat to be operated in a much safer manner is so simple, why are some folks continually not following said practice?
Sydwayz is offline  
Old 05-09-2006, 01:10 PM
  #57  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: South Florida
Posts: 399
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Re: "Thank *goodness* I was not wearing my safety/kill switch lanyard!"

With one kill switch killing multiple engines at the same time, what happens if your one & only kill switch goes bad? What do you do when you need to only kill just one engine & not the other? CanDo
CanDo is offline  
Old 05-09-2006, 02:30 PM
  #58  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Iggy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Kissimmee, Florida
Posts: 4,155
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: "Thank *goodness* I was not wearing my safety/kill switch lanyard!"

If my boat managed to take off with me, or anyone at the controls, I couldn't live with myself if an innocent person or child was injured, maimed, or killed as result of me not taking 10 seconds to connect the kill switch. It's not a matter of personal liberties or freedom.
We all do things like not wear seat belts, smoke, use dangerous chemicals, work around dangerous machines, etc. These, for the most part, only endanger ourselves.
Iggy is offline  
Old 05-09-2006, 05:01 PM
  #59  
Registered
 
formula31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: ohio
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: "Thank *goodness* I was not wearing my safety/kill switch lanyard!"

Originally Posted by Sydwayz
Not true Tom. I am definately more concerned with public safety than I am the insurance issue, but both are valid points. My main point is that if a 3-second task (if that) of enabling your boat to be operated in a much safer manner is so simple, why are some folks continually not following said practice?
My engines with wet exhaust would not survive a shut off at high rpm, they injest water and lockup and bend things. Still better than flying off by itself but an errant shutdown would be catastrophic for me. I am looking at the proximity sensors and if they end up with a good track record I think thats the way to go. No inconvenience, no fuss, no muss. Anybody on here using them?

I quess the unbelievable behavior I see on the roads everyday that I consider much more dangerous and life threatening is of greater interest to me than a boat flying along on its own. I think the area one boats in plays a part in the risk too. Im sure many of the crowded inland waterways would be a bad place for a boat on the loose. Great Lakes or the ocean, not so likely to actually hit someone.
formula31 is offline  
Old 05-09-2006, 09:45 PM
  #60  
Ginger or Mary Ann?
Charter Member
 
US1 Fountain's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: L
Posts: 11,029
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default Re: "Thank *goodness* I was not wearing my safety/kill switch lanyard!"

Originally Posted by CanDo
With one kill switch killing multiple engines at the same time, what happens if your one & only kill switch goes bad? What do you do when you need to only kill just one engine & not the other? CanDo
My single switch simple just breaks the circut. Its a double pole switch, so only 1 switch for the 2 motors. If it goes bad, you can just connect the 2 wires together for each motor and away you go.
US1 Fountain is offline  


Quick Reply: "Thank *goodness* I was not wearing my safety/kill switch lanyard!"


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.