Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Fuel Consumption:  Merc 496HO vs. Merc 525 >

Fuel Consumption: Merc 496HO vs. Merc 525

Notices

Fuel Consumption: Merc 496HO vs. Merc 525

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-22-2007, 12:56 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Fuel Consumption: Merc 496HO vs. Merc 525

Anyone know the tech info on this? Wondering how much difference there is at various RPMs.

Thanks!
Magic34 is offline  
Old 10-22-2007, 01:45 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
25 hors la loi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: North of the Border
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok me and my friend have the same boat ( Sunsation 288 ) same hull , but differente motor Ho vs 525 ....and at our summer trip we made around 600 miles in 8 days ( at average speed 38 mph ) ....and the difference in consumption is 15 % more for me .....
hope that help
25 hors la loi is offline  
Old 10-22-2007, 02:24 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
Anarchy Powerboats's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Phoenix, Havasu, Newport
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Don't do it
Anarchy Powerboats is offline  
Old 10-22-2007, 03:22 PM
  #4  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Newbury Park, CA
Posts: 1,495
Received 47 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 25 hors la loi
Ok me and my friend have the same boat ( Sunsation 288 ) same hull , but differente motor Ho vs 525 ....and at our summer trip we made around 600 miles in 8 days ( at average speed 38 mph ) ....and the difference in consumption is 15 % more for me .....
hope that help
Which one did you have?

Michael
Michael1 is offline  
Old 10-22-2007, 03:33 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
TSPM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: ~ Long Island ~ NY
Posts: 3,374
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Michael1
Which one did you have?

Michael
YUP.....My guess would be he has the 525 but who know...we have seen about a 8% difference between the two the HO being the better economically.
TSPM is offline  
Old 10-22-2007, 03:40 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
25 hors la loi's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: North of the Border
Posts: 860
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Michael1
Which one did you have?

Michael
Look my Avatar ..... 15 % more fuel .....but its worth the money ... ....
Attached Thumbnails Fuel Consumption:  Merc 496HO vs. Merc 525-p11206001-large-.jpg   Fuel Consumption:  Merc 496HO vs. Merc 525-p1180267-large-.jpg  
25 hors la loi is offline  
Old 10-22-2007, 03:41 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
bluellama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: 1000 Islands/Ottawa Ontario
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Michael1
Which one did you have?

Michael

There is a pic of a 525 in his avatar, so if I were a betting man, and I am , I'd say the 525 is 15% more thirsty on a 288 Sunsation.

Last edited by bluellama; 10-22-2007 at 03:47 PM.
bluellama is offline  
Old 10-22-2007, 05:54 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Westport, Kentucky
Posts: 1,411
Received 17 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

The real sticking point comes it hull effeciency. If you only compare fuel flow at X rpm the results are skewed. For instance my boat wallows by comparison at 3000 but at 3200 it feels loose and wants to run. This of course depends on tab setting. One power package may look very economical at 3000 and another not so good. But how many RPM do I need to turn to get to the speed the hull free's up if I am running a lesser motor with smaller pitch prop?
BadDog is offline  
Old 10-22-2007, 06:12 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Jigsaw89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,007
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thumbs up

100hp more than a 496HO at 15% more fuel consumption sounds reasonable to me.
Jigsaw89 is offline  
Old 10-22-2007, 07:41 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
cuda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Deland, Florida
Posts: 25,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If fuel consumption is a concern, this is definetely the wrong sport for you. I still say gas is the cheapest thing I ever put in a boat.
cuda is offline  


Quick Reply: Fuel Consumption: Merc 496HO vs. Merc 525


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.