Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Diesel engines in speed boat >

Diesel engines in speed boat

Notices

Diesel engines in speed boat

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-13-2008, 07:05 PM
  #331  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Jassman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Posts: 9,398
Received 32 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HabanaJoe
Ok, we need to get on the same page here. Everyone is talking about speed, acceleration, etc but we have no benchmarks.

So,
how fast do you want a diesel boat to go?

That is how we get to (for arguments sake) what is needed to get there.

In my eyes 65-75 mph is useless. You can get most of todays35' -42' gas powered boats to run that fast with pretty mild engines.

My idea of diesel offshore powerboat is 100-110 mph.

The reason I say this is because I think that is where you start to have un-reliable/short lived gas engines. So, if you have diesels boats running that fast you have an advantage.

So, how fast do you want a diesel boat to go?

What do you want from a diesel powered boat?

Joe Gere
Get me 90 in a twin application in a 43-45' boat (43 Nor-Tech) and Id be kissing your azz
Jassman is offline  
Old 10-13-2008, 08:18 PM
  #332  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Freehold, NJ
Posts: 1,397
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Jassman,

It's very easy and again no Bullsh*t it was done 20 years ago with mechanical engines. It boils down to loosing midrange unless you have a 2 speed.

600 hp Cummins C's will put you close.

715 QSM 11's and your smokin' in a 43'.

Jass, I wrote about this on here once before and some people laughed at me for being a dinousaur. Get the Arenson drives with the chain boxes on them so the drives can be lowered in the boat and put close together. (People don't realize when looking at the Buzzi boats how close and low the drives were. Our OD boxes were made on an offset and angled in and down to connect to the drives).

You can get your OD (.70 depending on which engine) gearing through the chain boxes and when you use a 2 speed you want a final drive of 1:1. I beleive the ZF has a 1.33:1 / 1:1 that gives you direct drive to get on plane and hit high gear and you have OD.

Your going to loose mid-range speed because of the smaller dia props you'll be using. So the ability to plane at probalbly less than 30-40 mph will not exist, the boat either plows along or is up and humming.

You can take this to any builder and they most likely will say "NO way". But they haven't build fast diesel boats, raced diesel boats or lost $4 million of their own money playing with them.

I say these things with conviction because they work, if you wanted to I'd fly down and meet you and discuss in person. I want nothing from you, I'd spend my money to help you get going because I would like someone with some b*lls to get off their azz and do what I can't afford to do anymore.

Joe Gere

I'm really starting to sound crazy aren't I ????

Last edited by HabanaJoe; 10-13-2008 at 08:28 PM.
HabanaJoe is offline  
Old 10-13-2008, 08:35 PM
  #333  
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by HabanaJoe
Jassman,

It's very easy and again no Bullsh*t it was done 20 years ago with mechanical engines. It boils down to loosing midrange unless you have a 2 speed.

600 hp Cummins C's will put you close.

715 QSM 11's and your smokin' in a 43'.

Jass, I wrote about this on here once before and some people laughed at me for being a dinousaur. Get the Arenson drives with the chain boxes on them so the drives can be lowered in the boat and put close together. (People don't realize when looking at the Buzzi boats how close and low the drives were. Our OD boxes were made on an offset and angled in and down to connect to the drives).

You can get your OD (.70 depending on which engine) gearing through the chain boxes and when you use a 2 speed you want a final drive of 1:1. I beleive the ZF has a 1.33:1 / 1:1 that gives you direct drive to get on plane and hit high gear and you have OD.

Your going to loose mid-range speed because of the smaller dia props you'll be using. So the ability to plane at probalbly less than 30-40 mph will not exist, the boat either plows along or is up and humming.

You can take this to any builder and they most likely will say "NO way". But they haven't build fast diesel boats, raced diesel boats or lost $4 million of their own money playing with them.

I say these things with conviction because they work, if you wanted to I'd fly down and meet you and discuss in person. I want nothing from you, I'd spend my money to help you get going because I would like someone with some b*lls to get off their azz and do what I can't afford to do anymore.

Joe Gere

I'm really starting to sound crazy aren't I ????
Crazy?? I've learned more from you about how to get speed from diesels than anyone else. What about 3-4 speed gearboxes like Weismann?
Hot Knots is offline  
Old 10-13-2008, 09:01 PM
  #334  
Registered
 
DirtyMoney's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Murrayville, GA
Posts: 3,025
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Does anyone know the true numbers of the Seatek Sonic a few years ago? I was once told 98. 90-100 would be ideal for me too. I have a 41' mold that I hope to see put to use with some diesels one day. I truly would like to see the century mark broken with diesels without losing reliability by turning them too much.
DirtyMoney is offline  
Old 10-13-2008, 09:30 PM
  #335  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Freehold, NJ
Posts: 1,397
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I'ved said this more than once on here - the black #38 in 1990 ran 92-94 with twin almost 600hp Seateks and with twin 750's ran 102-104 and would have went faster but we didn't have taller gears at the time. All the gear boxes were one offs and it took time to make them.

Dollor Marine the Apache 41 in manufacturer V circa 1990 was without question the only 41 going near if not over 100mph.

Every race Dollor Marine pulled if not pasted us on the turns and we past her on the straight, with no problem at all. Pull the race tapes you'll see it yourself.


Anyone who seen a Buzzi boat trun knew - they can't make sharp turns, you needed to slow them down and engine steer them around the corner.

Why don't boat builders do it if it's so easy - becasue other than a very few people no one really wants them, the reasons are many.
HabanaJoe is offline  
Old 10-14-2008, 02:46 PM
  #336  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: West edge of the Pacific
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by HabanaJoe
Dollor Marine the Apache 41 in manufacturer V circa 1990 was
Why don't boat builders do it if it's so easy - becasue other than a very few people no one really wants them, the reasons are many.
Maybe with Merc getting in bed with Cummins there will be some new corporate interest in Diesels.
29Firefox is offline  
Old 10-14-2008, 02:48 PM
  #337  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: West edge of the Pacific
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Why half step

Originally Posted by HabanaJoe
Jassman,

It's very easy and again no Bullsh*t it was done 20 years ago with mechanical engines. It boils down to loosing midrange unless you have a 2 speed.

600 hp Cummins C's will put you close.

715 QSM 11's and your smokin' in a 43'.

Jass, I wrote about this on here once before and some people laughed at me for being a dinousaur. Get the Arenson drives with the chain boxes on them so the drives can be lowered in the boat and put close together. (People don't realize when looking at the Buzzi boats how close and low the drives were. Our OD boxes were made on an offset and angled in and down to connect to the drives).

You can get your OD (.70 depending on which engine) gearing through the chain boxes and when you use a 2 speed you want a final drive of 1:1. I beleive the ZF has a 1.33:1 / 1:1 that gives you direct drive to get on plane and hit high gear and you have OD.

Your going to loose mid-range speed because of the smaller dia props you'll be using. So the ability to plane at probalbly less than 30-40 mph will not exist, the boat either plows along or is up and humming.

You can take this to any builder and they most likely will say "NO way". But they haven't build fast diesel boats, raced diesel boats or lost $4 million of their own money playing with them.

I say these things with conviction because they work, if you wanted to I'd fly down and meet you and discuss in person. I want nothing from you, I'd spend my money to help you get going because I would like someone with some b*lls to get off their azz and do what I can't afford to do anymore.

Joe Gere

I'm really starting to sound crazy aren't I ????
Why not do like Buzzi and step up the 14L engines like he did in his 42?
29Firefox is offline  
Old 10-14-2008, 05:30 PM
  #338  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default more data for you

I can only share the numbers i get with the heavy meteor. With a roller painted black antifouling bottom and fixed surface drives and a weight of about 19000 lbs we are running about 60mph max. As i have said we do hit 3150 with these props right away so there is maybe a bit of room on the top end...but the boat works so well at low speed and midrange that it is probably going to stay the way it is.

63 or 65 max is my guess with a standard painted bottom and a bit more pitch at this weight and hp with the 725 seateks and fixed drives...you guys can probably guess the mph increase with a perfect bottom..i cant.

At least you have the heavy-fast numbers to mess with in your predictions

mark
fact5 is offline  
Old 10-14-2008, 06:58 PM
  #339  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Freehold, NJ
Posts: 1,397
Received 15 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

firefox,

My thought the 14L are just too big and they are not marinized well out of the box for these applications, it's too much work to build one offs.

Plus, if someone wanted to build a boat today I would never ask them to put up money and do R&D, the 11's are drop in and a guy like you could squeeze a few more ponies out of it with ease on the computer if the owner wanted it done.

fact5,

I don't want to be harsh here but your boat is just not designed to work as well as it could with surface drives. I feel no matter how much HP you put in it the returns just won't be worth it even if you were to think about it. I think higher Hp gives you diminishing returns with that boat.

Now, from a practical standpoint, your have a great package and let's be real, you can't cruise much faster than you do now and be as comfortable. I would love to have what you have!
HabanaJoe is offline  
Old 10-14-2008, 10:40 PM
  #340  
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: West edge of the Pacific
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by HabanaJoe
firefox,
My thought the 14L are just too big and they are not marinized well out of the box for these applications, it's too much work to build one offs.
True Cummins doesn't have a decent 14L class engine. But Cat C-15 ACERT engines are a nice package and have an E rating of 865 hp. Also Komatsu's 6M140 with an A5 rating of 930 hp ain't no slouch either. Also I hear Komatsu is gonna up that when they come out with a higher number when they come out with the new common rail model.

Look at Buzzi's 42' Patrol RIB with twin C-15 ACERTS. It does 70 knots out of the box. Wonder what it would do with a few tweaks
29Firefox is offline  


Quick Reply: Diesel engines in speed boat


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.