Notices

CMI exhaust

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-08-2011, 10:03 PM
  #11  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lake Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PARADOX
2005 IS NEWER style.
I'm working on a "No leak" header design. Getting close. If I have some time, I will find when CMI sold the Co. and some changes happened.
There is a way to "fix" (or at least help) that problem with the 1/4" gap.
Definitely share your fix to the 525 header problem!!!
bert4332 is offline  
Old 05-09-2011, 05:43 AM
  #12  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: dallas tx.
Posts: 1,186
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Dave M
Well, now I'm confused. I read that "newer" style did not have the outer tubes directly to the flange. My 525 is a 2005 model.
the newer style does not,,,does not ,,,have the outer tube welder to the flange,,
TWIN-SPINS is offline  
Old 05-09-2011, 07:39 AM
  #13  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,796
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bert4332
Definitely share your fix to the 525 header problem!!!
I don't have a "fix", just some things that will help based on discussions with a lot of people, and companies.
I will elaborate on this later, but to reduce problems at the 1/4" gap, have a good welder weld some beads between the flange and the other tube. 6-8 at each gap/tube. Basically you will thicken the "inner" tube. Less movement, less cracks, more mass, better heat distribution.
This will add "mass" to that area and make it stiffer/stronger.
Just need to be careful don't burn through the tube.
In short the idea is to connect the other tube to the flange also.
Connect the top of the headers with a bar at top of the header. Like a tie rod. This will reduce vibrations and side to side movement. The weakest point is at the smallest area and thinnest. THE GAP.

Last edited by PARADOX; 05-09-2011 at 08:44 AM. Reason: sp
PARADOX is offline  
Old 05-09-2011, 07:48 AM
  #14  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Dave M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Hollywood, MD, USA
Posts: 5,654
Received 123 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TWIN-SPINS
the newer style does not,,,does not ,,,have the outer tube welder to the flange,,
That's what I thought. But Paradox said that CMI says that the 1/4" gap is the problem. Wouldn't that would mean that the "newer" sytle is prone to cracks too?

Well, it is what it is......I will just keep a real close eye on mine and hope for the best.
Dave M is offline  
Old 05-09-2011, 08:40 AM
  #15  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,796
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dave M
That's what I thought. But Paradox said that CMI says that the 1/4" gap is the problem. Wouldn't that would mean that the "newer" sytle is prone to cracks too?

Well, it is what it is......I will just keep a real close eye on mine and hope for the best.
Dave
Read it again. Newer style is NOT WELDED TO FLANGE = 1/4" +- gap.
I did not referenced what CMI said. Others did. CMI did NOT SAY they have ANY problems.

Last edited by PARADOX; 05-09-2011 at 08:42 AM.
PARADOX is offline  
Old 05-09-2011, 09:18 AM
  #16  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Dave M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Hollywood, MD, USA
Posts: 5,654
Received 123 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PARADOX
Dave
Read it again. Newer style is NOT WELDED TO FLANGE = 1/4" +- gap.
I did not referenced what CMI said. Others did. CMI did NOT SAY they have ANY problems.
OK, got it, newer = 1/4" gap.

The procedure you described includes adding material to the area of the gap. The GAP is the weak point

So, the newer style is prone to cracking issues too.
Dave M is offline  
Old 05-09-2011, 06:35 PM
  #17  
Registered
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Fort Erie Ontario Canada
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

is this related mostly to the 525's
JMPH is offline  
Old 05-09-2011, 06:52 PM
  #18  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JMPH
is this related mostly to the 525's
Mainly 525....more so with staggard 525's....but NOT limited too just those.

Last edited by Baja_man; 05-09-2011 at 08:40 PM. Reason: missing word
Baja_man is offline  
Old 05-09-2011, 08:20 PM
  #19  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,796
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Baja_man
Mainly 525....more so with staggard 525's....but limited too just those.
Noooo... Not limited.. Don't know where did you get this or why you even commenting when you don't know.
Many CMI headers have problems. 496's, 500's ,525's, 600, 700. and even others. 525's are one of the most sold. Thus, most referenced.
PARADOX is offline  
Old 05-09-2011, 09:25 PM
  #20  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I thought this "gap" is what CMI called their "cool collar" design that was supposed to be the best thing since sliced bread in the world of water cooled marine tube headers ... rendering those designs without it inferior and obsolete? The direct welded tubes like the old E-Top style are better, now? Are the one's with the "gap" cracking predominantly interally or externally at that junction from one tube to two tubes? I guess I'm confused now.

Last edited by bob_t; 05-09-2011 at 10:50 PM.
bob_t is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.