CMI exhaust
#11
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Lake Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Definitely share your fix to the 525 header problem!!!
#12
Registered
#13
Registered
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't have a "fix", just some things that will help based on discussions with a lot of people, and companies.
I will elaborate on this later, but to reduce problems at the 1/4" gap, have a good welder weld some beads between the flange and the other tube. 6-8 at each gap/tube. Basically you will thicken the "inner" tube. Less movement, less cracks, more mass, better heat distribution.
This will add "mass" to that area and make it stiffer/stronger.
Just need to be careful don't burn through the tube.
In short the idea is to connect the other tube to the flange also.
Connect the top of the headers with a bar at top of the header. Like a tie rod. This will reduce vibrations and side to side movement. The weakest point is at the smallest area and thinnest. THE GAP.
I will elaborate on this later, but to reduce problems at the 1/4" gap, have a good welder weld some beads between the flange and the other tube. 6-8 at each gap/tube. Basically you will thicken the "inner" tube. Less movement, less cracks, more mass, better heat distribution.
This will add "mass" to that area and make it stiffer/stronger.
Just need to be careful don't burn through the tube.
In short the idea is to connect the other tube to the flange also.
Connect the top of the headers with a bar at top of the header. Like a tie rod. This will reduce vibrations and side to side movement. The weakest point is at the smallest area and thinnest. THE GAP.
Last edited by PARADOX; 05-09-2011 at 08:44 AM. Reason: sp
#14
Gold Member
![](https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/images/icons/gold_member_star.gif)
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Well, it is what it is......I will just keep a real close eye on mine and hope for the best.
#15
Registered
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Read it again. Newer style is NOT WELDED TO FLANGE = 1/4" +- gap.
I did not referenced what CMI said. Others did. CMI did NOT SAY they have ANY problems.
Last edited by PARADOX; 05-09-2011 at 08:42 AM.
#16
Gold Member
![](https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/images/icons/gold_member_star.gif)
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The procedure you described includes adding material to the area of the gap. The GAP is the weak point
So, the newer style is prone to cracking issues too.
#18
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Michigan
Posts: 1,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#19
Registered
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Many CMI headers have problems. 496's, 500's ,525's, 600, 700. and even others. 525's are one of the most sold. Thus, most referenced.
#20
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 710
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I thought this "gap" is what CMI called their "cool collar" design that was supposed to be the best thing since sliced bread in the world of water cooled marine tube headers ... rendering those designs without it inferior and obsolete? The direct welded tubes like the old E-Top style are better, now? Are the one's with the "gap" cracking predominantly interally or externally at that junction from one tube to two tubes? I guess I'm confused now.
![Confused](/forums/images/smilies/confused.gif)
Last edited by bob_t; 05-09-2011 at 10:50 PM.