OffshoreDrillin
#3
VIP Member
VIP Member
stay tuned
#4
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bell Canyon, CA
Posts: 12,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#6
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Bell Canyon, CA
Posts: 12,754
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#8
VIP Member
VIP Member
I stated the fact as they were. When Brian, the "B" of M+B holdings who is 51% owner of outerlimits sells his shares that is indeed the "company" being sold. No matter what screwed up business college anyone went to 51% is majority share.
As I stated yesterday, Mike isn't the only one that had shares in the company. I have no clue as to why everyone took it as a negative thing, just because someone sells his interest in something doesn't necessarily mean it was for a bad reason, not my problem the way people interpret things.. I'm quite sure that OL will continue to do business as they have. But the facts are the facts.
As I stated yesterday, Mike isn't the only one that had shares in the company. I have no clue as to why everyone took it as a negative thing, just because someone sells his interest in something doesn't necessarily mean it was for a bad reason, not my problem the way people interpret things.. I'm quite sure that OL will continue to do business as they have. But the facts are the facts.
#9
Registered
maybe rob needs to call mike fiore and tell him the company has been sold,he must have not gotten the memo yet,lol.
#10
Registered
Anybody ask OL if 51% of their stock was sold? Its rather obvious Matt Trulio didn't.
Last edited by TexomaPowerboater; 08-03-2012 at 09:49 AM.