Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Fountain @ LOTO passengers injured in near rollover >

Fountain @ LOTO passengers injured in near rollover

Notices

Fountain @ LOTO passengers injured in near rollover

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-04-2012, 06:45 PM
  #231  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lucky strike
I guess he just ran out of talent.
Bummer for the people in the boat!
Wasn't trying to slam on boat racers.. Just pointing out that there are a lot of "race boat drivers" that are dangerous and there is a lot of pleasure boaters that are dangerous.. And there are a lot of safe boaters in both groups as well.. The fact that someone raced or races a boat does not put them on some driving pedestal in my eyes. Hell the fact that someone took the Tres course does not put them on a pedestal in my eyes. I have taken it, and I learned a few things, but by no means am I going to go hop into some Skater and try to run Serpentine at 150+..

Drive to what's right for the conditions, to what is safe for your passengers and within your abilities, and 99% of the time things will shake out alright. The other 1% is either mechanical failure, freak accident, or the infamous "**** Happens" Just my .02... and you know opinions are like.. And we are on the internet so my thoughts are worth less then .02. LOL

RD
RiverDave is offline  
Old 09-04-2012, 06:46 PM
  #232  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: LOTO
Posts: 1,200
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Rick, I just can't understand why you boat here if you hate the cruisers so much. I hate jet skis, old people hate powerboaters, small boat owners hate cruisers, and so on. It just seems your on a witch hunt with them. You've made multiple posts on both sites about them.
redbud35 is offline  
Old 09-04-2012, 06:51 PM
  #233  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wyandotte, MI
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

So these "open water" cruiser are running "open water speeds" on a lake? What would you call a 38' Fountain? I am pretty sure that is an "off shore open water boat" traveling at speeds beyond the conditions. You are taking this "responsible for your own wake" a bit too far. How about you are responsible for launching your boat on its side then wiping out? I hope everyone recovers quickly and without emotional damage. But come on, let stop all this cruiser wake BS. I have a 26' Velocity and am around plenty of big cruisers in the Detroit River. At no time have I ever thought it was the responsibility of the cruiser to make sure his wake didn't interupt my travels. If in a no wake zone that is a different stoy. However, if a cruiser wake launches a 38' boat or any boat for that matter they were either both violating a no wake zone or they were in an open area where a wake is permitted. I think it is absurd to say a cruiser should slow down as to not create a wake for your offshore boat....
low_psi is offline  
Old 09-04-2012, 06:56 PM
  #234  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Is this thread going to go on forever??? Yes we all feel bad for the innocent soles who put their trust in that driver and learned an expensive and very painfull lesson. But enough is enough, lets quick beating a dead horse. The one lesson we can all learn from this is:

ON BUSY WEEKENDS and in ROUGH QUESTIOABLE WATER "SLOW the "F" DOWN.

But then there will always be the idiots who will run "Balls to the Wall" in any condition!!!

Race boat driver or not "COMMON SENCE" to many people have none or at the least not enough!!!!!!!!!!

Just my .02 cents worth.

Last but not least: I hope for a speedy recovery to all the injured involved!!
Likefastboats is offline  
Old 09-04-2012, 07:04 PM
  #235  
Registered
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Would someone please set me straight on the "cruiser wake" issue? I own a cruiser and a go fast. When in the cruiser, I observe no wake zones and generally try to avoid anchored fishermen (although they have a habit of spreading out in a line over several miles - that can be frustrating); otherwise, I cruise on plane at my most efficient trim. It's a heavy, wide boat that throws a wake - that's what it does. Is anyone suggesting that I should maintain 10 knots in open water just because go fasts are operating in the general vacinity??

Conversely, when running the go fast, I similarly observe no-wake zones and otherwise run in open water watching for wakes and useing my best efforts to take then at a suitable speed and angle. Am I missing something?? Should I be demanding flat, wake-free waters when I am operating my go fast?

Seriously - does anyone actually believe this???
DucBoy is offline  
Old 09-04-2012, 07:16 PM
  #236  
Fast Singles Club
Gold Member
 
the deep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Raystown Lake , Pa.
Posts: 4,040
Received 486 Likes on 178 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jeffswav
Agree, there are many people that drive the cruisers sensibly. But more that have no respect for smaller boats. This crash could have been avoided by driving slower given the conditions. So its not all the cruisers fault, but it was a contributing factor.
Some of us get it , some of us don't , such is life . Cruiser captains you are free to wake us at will with no repercussions , NOT You all shoot the gun it's everyone elses responsibility to stay out of the stream of bullets.....Hmmm
Note : Cruisers that can get on plane are not the problem , it's the hole blowing tubs that can't get on plane on inland lakes .

Last edited by the deep; 09-04-2012 at 07:22 PM.
the deep is offline  
Old 09-04-2012, 07:18 PM
  #237  
Registered
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Wyandotte, MI
Posts: 2,480
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DucBoy

Seriously - does anyone actually believe this???
As surprising as it may seem, YES there are people on this forum that do believe this.

All of you that believe cruisers should slow down and make sure they don't disturb your water Here is an idea, anytime you see a cruiser making a wake that disturbs your day, jump on the radio and hail the coastguard or local police let them know your had to slow down in your "offshore boat" to safely navigat the cruiser's evil wake. Let them know this is in fact a violation of the law, they way you interpret it. I am curious to hear the reply you receive. "Sir, this is the local police water patrol responding to your call. Was this vessel in a no wake zone?" Answer: well no. "Did this cruiser pass you in an unsafe manner" Answer: well no. "Sir, how fast was the cruiser traveling in regards to you" Answer: well we were running 90+ and the cruiser had to be traveling at least 20 MPH. I approached him at a speed 4 times what he was traveling and he never slowed down so I could pass him. I had to slow my boat down to a safe speed of 50MPH. "Sir, how much have you been drinking today?"

Last edited by low_psi; 09-04-2012 at 07:27 PM.
low_psi is offline  
Old 09-04-2012, 07:19 PM
  #238  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Millstadt, IL
Posts: 1,888
Received 18 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DucBoy
Would someone please set me straight on the "cruiser wake" issue? I own a cruiser and a go fast. When in the cruiser, I observe no wake zones and generally try to avoid anchored fishermen (although they have a habit of spreading out in a line over several miles - that can be frustrating); otherwise, I cruise on plane at my most efficient trim. It's a heavy, wide boat that throws a wake - that's what it does. Is anyone suggesting that I should maintain 10 knots in open water just because go fasts are operating in the general vacinity??

Conversely, when running the go fast, I similarly observe no-wake zones and otherwise run in open water watching for wakes and useing my best efforts to take then at a suitable speed and angle. Am I missing something?? Should I be demanding flat, wake-free waters when I am operating my go fast?

Seriously - does anyone actually believe this???
You say "Open Water" are you boating in the ocean?
jeffswav is offline  
Old 09-04-2012, 07:21 PM
  #239  
Registered
 
ActiveThunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pompano Beach, Florida
Posts: 3,528
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Did you guys really go from making the driver responsible for his actions and the safety of his passengers to a guy driving a cruiser making a boat wake?
ActiveThunder is offline  
Old 09-04-2012, 07:25 PM
  #240  
Registered
 
Frequency's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Peoria, IL & FMB, FL
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by DucBoy
Would someone please set me straight on the "cruiser wake" issue? I own a cruiser and a go fast. When in the cruiser, I observe no wake zones and generally try to avoid anchored fishermen (although they have a habit of spreading out in a line over several miles - that can be frustrating); otherwise, I cruise on plane at my most efficient trim. It's a heavy, wide boat that throws a wake - that's what it does. Is anyone suggesting that I should maintain 10 knots in open water just because go fasts are operating in the general vacinity??

Conversely, when running the go fast, I similarly observe no-wake zones and otherwise run in open water watching for wakes and useing my best efforts to take then at a suitable speed and angle. Am I missing something?? Should I be demanding flat, wake-free waters when I am operating my go fast?

Seriously - does anyone actually believe this???
+1 DucBoy

LOTO is what it is. The only cruiser wake complaint I would have is the guy who plows though a cove or No Wake area, where it is obvious that his wake would be substantial - and destructive. At the Lake you know it is going to be rough on holiday weekends, and you should take precautions. It's not like a wave comes along with a banner that says: "this wake brought to you exclusively by Mr. Plow."
Frequency is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.