The NOTHING stated here is going to CHANGE ANYONE'S VOTE thread.
#1491
Trump has said again that he will not protect select NATO member countries if they are attacked by Russia (Trump calls it Soviet Union and says it is the same, I think he has talked too much with Putin)
It is interesting that NATO invoked Article 5 for the first and only time in its history after the 9/11 terrorist attacks against the United States.
NATO countries supported the USA after the 9/11 attack, including Denmark where I am from, and we lost as many men/women in Afghanistan as the USA did if you normalize after the size of the population.
But now the USA, if Trump is elected, does not want to support select NATO countries if they are attacked by Russia/Putin. It is an indirect invitation for Putin to attack NATO member countries, since Trump does not intend to honor Article 5.
It is interesting that NATO invoked Article 5 for the first and only time in its history after the 9/11 terrorist attacks against the United States.
NATO countries supported the USA after the 9/11 attack, including Denmark where I am from, and we lost as many men/women in Afghanistan as the USA did if you normalize after the size of the population.
But now the USA, if Trump is elected, does not want to support select NATO countries if they are attacked by Russia/Putin. It is an indirect invitation for Putin to attack NATO member countries, since Trump does not intend to honor Article 5.
#1492
Registered
Trump has said again that he will not protect select NATO member countries if they are attacked by Russia (Trump calls it Soviet Union and says it is the same, I think he has talked too much with Putin) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYJCF90UdLQ
It is interesting that NATO invoked Article 5 for the first and only time in its history after the 9/11 terrorist attacks against the United States.
NATO countries supported the USA after the 9/11 attack, including Denmark where I am from, and we lost as many men/women in Afghanistan as the USA did if you normalize after the size of the population.
But now the USA, if Trump is elected, does not want to support select NATO countries if they are attacked by Russia/Putin. It is an indirect invitation for Putin to attack NATO member countries, since Trump does not intend to honor Article 5.
It is interesting that NATO invoked Article 5 for the first and only time in its history after the 9/11 terrorist attacks against the United States.
NATO countries supported the USA after the 9/11 attack, including Denmark where I am from, and we lost as many men/women in Afghanistan as the USA did if you normalize after the size of the population.
But now the USA, if Trump is elected, does not want to support select NATO countries if they are attacked by Russia/Putin. It is an indirect invitation for Putin to attack NATO member countries, since Trump does not intend to honor Article 5.
None paying countries??
The following 3 users liked this post by underpsi68:
#1493
VIP Member
VIP Member
Trump has said again that he will not protect select NATO member countries if they are attacked by Russia (Trump calls it Soviet Union and says it is the same, I think he has talked too much with Putin) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cYJCF90UdLQ
It is interesting that NATO invoked Article 5 for the first and only time in its history after the 9/11 terrorist attacks against the United States.
NATO countries supported the USA after the 9/11 attack, including Denmark where I am from, and we lost as many men/women in Afghanistan as the USA did if you normalize after the size of the population.
But now the USA, if Trump is elected, does not want to support select NATO countries if they are attacked by Russia/Putin. It is an indirect invitation for Putin to attack NATO member countries, since Trump does not intend to honor Article 5.
It is interesting that NATO invoked Article 5 for the first and only time in its history after the 9/11 terrorist attacks against the United States.
NATO countries supported the USA after the 9/11 attack, including Denmark where I am from, and we lost as many men/women in Afghanistan as the USA did if you normalize after the size of the population.
But now the USA, if Trump is elected, does not want to support select NATO countries if they are attacked by Russia/Putin. It is an indirect invitation for Putin to attack NATO member countries, since Trump does not intend to honor Article 5.
The following 6 users liked this post by offshoredrillin:
fountain4play (Today), Hoodoo 2.0 (Today), IGetWet (Today), sutphen 30 (Today), tommymonza (Today), TomZ (Today)
#1494
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2023
Location: Sarasota FL Priest River ID
Posts: 702
Received 1,100 Likes
on
415 Posts
Mark Alexander Milley (born June 20, 1958) is a retired United States Army general who last served as the 20th chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff from October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2023. He previously served as the 39th chief of staff of the Army from August 14, 2015 to August 9, 2019 [3] and held multiple command and staff positions in eight divisions and special forces throughout his military career.
An ROTC graduate from Princeton University, Milley earned his commission as an armor officer in 1980. He later received a Masters degree from Columbia University. He was appointed chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff by US president Donald Trump, making Milley the tenth U.S. Army officer to be chairman. As chairman, Milley was the highest-ranking officer in the United States Armed Forces and the principal military advisor to the president of the United States, the secretary of defense, the National Security Council and the Homeland Security Council.[4]
Somehow Wally i don't think your in the same league as this guy with your knowledge,
An ROTC graduate from Princeton University, Milley earned his commission as an armor officer in 1980. He later received a Masters degree from Columbia University. He was appointed chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff by US president Donald Trump, making Milley the tenth U.S. Army officer to be chairman. As chairman, Milley was the highest-ranking officer in the United States Armed Forces and the principal military advisor to the president of the United States, the secretary of defense, the National Security Council and the Homeland Security Council.[4]
Somehow Wally i don't think your in the same league as this guy with your knowledge,
And to think with all that going for him, his final years before retirement, his focus was rooting “white rage” out of the military. His legacy is the current poor state of recruitment.
The following 5 users liked this post by Hoodoo 2.0:
#1495
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
The following 3 users liked this post by fountain4play:
#1496
Registered
Put velocityDave on ignore. The last time he posted before this thread was in 2020 screaming at us if we didn’t want the Shot .
Other than that thread and this one he has never contributed one thing boat wise .
Other than that thread and this one he has never contributed one thing boat wise .
The following 5 users liked this post by tommymonza:
#1497
Registered
NATO is the cause of the ukraine invasion, NATO broke the agreement to build bases or have bio labs by the russian border. NATO is part of the one world agenda and gets provoked by warmongers into conflicts, had they not broken the agreement russia never would have invaded.
The following users liked this post:
TomZ (Today)
The following users liked this post:
Padraig (Today)
#1499
Registered
#1500
Registered
liberals heres a plan for you
The following 2 users liked this post by sutphen 30:
anger mgmt (Today), HuskerPerformance (Today)