Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > General Discussion > General Boating Discussion
Volvo 8.1 GXi vs Merc 496HO, your thoughts? >

Volvo 8.1 GXi vs Merc 496HO, your thoughts?

Notices

Volvo 8.1 GXi vs Merc 496HO, your thoughts?

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-20-2005, 04:19 PM
  #11  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Manhasset, NY
Posts: 1,943
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Volvo 8.1 GXi vs Merc 496HO, your thoughts?

Pretty interesting to see this thread. My boat was purchased with an older style volvo system...I have had the boat 4 years now and it has run flawlessly. I have been talking about repowering for a while now and priced both options at the NYC boat show. A very hard decision to make do to the popularity of merc but I have gone with the volvo. First of all my marina is one of the east coasts largest volvo dealers and is superb with maintnance when needed. Second I have had such reliability with my current motor that i feel very safe staying with volvo. Third I don't mind losing a few mph (I will not be the fastest anyway) while gaining superb single engine meneuverability around the docks. Fourth would be that duo-prop hole shot...you come up on plane REAL FAST. Last would be price...when you add up all the bells and whistles they were about the same. Now if you plan on adding after market HP you have to go with merc...I will likely not be doing that do to how short our season is here in NY...I can't stand to lose a weekend!!!
Here's Johnny is offline  
Old 01-21-2005, 12:55 AM
  #12  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Wink Re: Volvo 8.1 GXi vs Merc 496HO, your thoughts?

The Volvo 8.1 GXi and Merc 496HO are both the same GM Powertrain engines. The differences are that Mercury makes freshwater cooling standard and on the Volvo it is optional. The Mercury uses their ECM which is the PCM555 with a guardian "mode" and the Volvo uses a MEFI 4 ECM system. The Volvo uses the DPX duo-prop drive and the Mercury uses the Bravo X. The Bravo XR is optional and better. The Volvo is available with an external hydraulic steering system on the drive as optional. The 496 engines show excellent results from both manufacturers. The Volvo drive is said to be stronger than the Mercury Bravo.The duo-prop drive on the Volvo is just a tad slower in top speed over the single prop Merc Bravo but tends to be faster out of the hole.. One place I know the Volvo can use help is the exhaust manifold-riser system. Volvo still uses a wet joint between a center log manifold(cast iron) and cast riser(cast iron), where-as the Mercury 496 exhaust manifolds are cast aluminum with stainless curved riser pipes and a dry riser-manifold joint.A decent set of aftermarket manifolds or headers solves this weakness in the Volvo. The Mercury exhaust manifolds flow better than the Volvo because they have individual runners to the riser and the Merc curved stainless riser is a is better than the Volvo sharp turn elbow. Mercury's exhaust manifolds for this engine also weigh much less than Volvo's. As for performance upgrades for this engine the Volvo and the Mercury 8.1-496 engines will both accept our BigPower kits and parts and both are easily capable of over 525 HP with our stock bolt ons.
Hope this clears some questions and helps everyone understand the differences between these two manufacturers 8.1 - 496 offerings.
Raylar
Raylar is offline  
Old 01-21-2005, 06:01 AM
  #13  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
East Coast B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Volvo 8.1 GXi vs Merc 496HO, your thoughts?

Thanks everyone! Lot's of good points, pro's and con's!

Really appreciate your time!
East Coast B is offline  
Old 01-21-2005, 06:53 AM
  #14  
Registered
 
bglz42's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Texas City, TX
Posts: 622
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: Volvo 8.1 GXi vs Merc 496HO, your thoughts?

Those Volvos don't last very long, either..

The Volvo AQ250 on my 1970 is all original, and has NEVER BEEN OPENED! And as you can imagine, with it beeing on an 18 Donzi, it's not babied....
Attached Thumbnails Volvo 8.1 GXi vs Merc 496HO, your thoughts?-hpim0364.jpg  
bglz42 is offline  
Old 01-21-2005, 09:07 AM
  #15  
Registered
 
fund razor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: Volvo 8.1 GXi vs Merc 496HO, your thoughts?

Nobody even mentioned that the Volvos are reversable rotation, at least the SX are, and that they shift better than anything else out there.
fund razor is offline  
Old 01-22-2005, 01:34 AM
  #16  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Newbury Park, CA
Posts: 1,495
Received 47 Likes on 30 Posts
Default Re: Volvo 8.1 GXi vs Merc 496HO, your thoughts?

Originally Posted by Raylar
One place I know the Volvo can use help is the exhaust manifold-riser system. Volvo still uses a wet joint between a center log manifold(cast iron) and cast riser(cast iron), where-as the Mercury 496 exhaust manifolds are cast aluminum with stainless curved riser pipes and a dry riser-manifold joint.A decent set of aftermarket manifolds or headers solves this weakness in the Volvo. The Mercury exhaust manifolds flow better than the Volvo because they have individual runners to the riser and the Merc curved stainless riser is a is better than the Volvo sharp turn elbow. Mercury's exhaust manifolds for this engine also weigh much less than Volvo's.
Raylar
All that work on the exhaust system, and Mercury only got 5 more hp that Volvo?

Michael
Michael1 is offline  
Old 02-04-2013, 08:45 AM
  #17  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hartsburg, Missouri
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 356 Hours Volvo 5.7gsi DP

I have run the living crap out of this boat for 10 years and that includes heavy, tubing , skiing, Full throttle for 5 minutes on too many occasions to count. Do not be afraid of the Volvo's. This boat has GPS'd at 60 mph and in my opinion Volvo DP's are better speed wise than a bravo 3
johnfharding is offline  
Old 02-04-2013, 10:15 AM
  #18  
Neno the mind boggler
VIP Member
 
glassdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: toledo oh
Posts: 13,076
Received 294 Likes on 101 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by outdrive man
We have sold volvo product since 1993, only five claims against warranty.
we have sold mercruiser since 1995, probably 5 claims a week.
the engines are basically the same the volvo drive system... i hate to say it but it is far supurior. a dps hits the rocks you replace the props
a bravo three hits the rock its usually trashed
amen to that, i have always been a huge Volvo fan and if i was building a new boat would use there stuff in a heartbeat. Heck i have a couple DPX set ups and even considered swapping them onto my Scarab III but plan to sell that boat soon and truth be told i wanna keep my hands on the stuff.

Volvo = engineers running engineering
Merc = marketing running engineering


lol, just saw this was a eight year old thread
__________________
Throttles- Cleveland Construction 377 Talon
08 OPA Class 1 National Champion
08 Class 1 Geico Triple Crown Champion
08 OPA High Points Champion
10 OPA Class 1 National Champion ( happy now Ed! )

Last edited by glassdave; 02-04-2013 at 10:20 AM. Reason: D'OH!
glassdave is offline  
Old 02-04-2013, 01:47 PM
  #19  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Troy, Mich
Posts: 2,728
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

GM builds both the Volvo and the black Merc 8.1's and sells the engine to them. They are virtually identical 8.1's and are set up as marine engines.

Wannabe
wannabe is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Magic34
General Boating Discussion
28
10-24-2007 05:05 PM
handfulz28
General Q & A
2
09-17-2007 10:43 PM
Pat McPherson
General Q & A
49
08-01-2007 02:15 PM
Bajalome
General Q & A
3
07-17-2007 11:33 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Quick Reply: Volvo 8.1 GXi vs Merc 496HO, your thoughts?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.