Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Expected Horsepower Increase From Through Prop to Through Hull? >

Expected Horsepower Increase From Through Prop to Through Hull?

Notices

Expected Horsepower Increase From Through Prop to Through Hull?

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-15-2011, 11:15 AM
  #11  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ray Twp. Michigan
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I thought I remembered when I had a 1989 24' Sunsation Rocket in the early 90's when I switched from thru hull with no mufflers to thru the prop the difference was like 1mph. This was with a stock 454 330hp bravo 1 and the boat was 7ft beam and about 3200lbs. More than likely on a larger heavier boat the change will be not measurable.
johnny b good is offline  
Old 12-15-2011, 03:58 PM
  #12  
Registered
Platinum Member
 
Carbon Footprint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Colorado
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Outdrive1
If you are running Bravo 3's you are probably wasting your time. Those drives seem to hit a wall around 55 mph or so. They are real efficient out of the hole and through the mid range but reach a point where they can't really move any more water. I would consider changing to Bravo 1's before I spent any money on any other parts. Start a thread about the performance of a Bravo 3 and get some more opinions.

Bravo 3 is good to a solid 65 mph before they reach their limit of effectiveness.
Carbon Footprint is offline  
Old 12-15-2011, 04:34 PM
  #13  
Registered
 
1 MAIDEN AMERICA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Renton, Wa
Posts: 1,026
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Leave it alone. Boat cheaply. More power to you. Besides, soon enough we'll "have" to have mufflers anyways. Switchable exhaust doesn't count. Or you could spend that cash on a K*** A** stereo and throw in a recording of a Top Fueler.

Exhaust = $$$$ + stereo to keep up = $$$ + noise ticket = $$$ + new mufflers = $$$$$$$$$$$$

Isn't boating fun?
1 MAIDEN AMERICA is offline  
Old 12-16-2011, 04:16 PM
  #14  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
mcollinstn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: tn
Posts: 5,755
Received 139 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

The stock "Y" pipe exhaust on big block Mercruisers is good to about 350hp. If your motor is less hp than that, you will likely get zero performance increase by going thru transom.

I don't really like seeing a slow boat making loud nascar noises.

If a boat will haul tail, then sure let's make it loud. But our lake has a lot of 45 mph boats with loud exhausts. About the only good thing I can say about that is that the swimmers will hear them coming far enough away that they can swim out of their path.

MC
mcollinstn is offline  
Old 12-19-2011, 08:34 AM
  #15  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Loud pipes save lives.
Secret Formula is offline  
Old 12-19-2011, 08:56 AM
  #16  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Further South East of Dome Island
Posts: 2,034
Received 34 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Loud pipes risk rights..
Pismo10 is offline  
Old 12-19-2011, 09:06 AM
  #17  
Registered
 
Biggus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Naples, Maine
Posts: 6,304
Received 31 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

In my experience, at that hp level and the weight of the boat you will not see any increase in speed at all. The stock thru prop exhaust flows just fine for the mild power of a 7.4 Merc.

Years back, I had a new Baja Sport 280 w/7.4L's It was ordered with thru prop exhaust. I had installed the Corsa silent choice system and saw zero gains in speed.

At the time, Gil Marine was advertising speed gains of up to 7 mph with their "Magnum" system. I spent close to 6 grand and still saw no increase in speed.

Unless you are adding more hp, there is no need to spend the money.

...personally, I dislike boats that make lots of noise when there is no need to. Loud, slow boats are not cool.
Biggus is offline  
Old 11-04-2012, 07:32 AM
  #18  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My wife and I purchased a 2000 330SS and had Bravo I installed. After rebuilding the 454's to 489's we added some CMI tips and diverters after the stock exhaust manifold. Switching the diverter from below water exhaust to above water exhaust gave us about 0.2 on the gps. If you look at the tack very closely you can almost see the needle move.
patmccoy is offline  
Old 11-04-2012, 10:32 AM
  #19  
Registered
 
tony davis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: South Coast, UK
Posts: 202
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It'll sound quicker, so you'll convince yourself there's a gain.
tony davis is offline  
Old 11-04-2012, 12:11 PM
  #20  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake Travis ,Texas
Posts: 2,295
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mcollinstn
The stock "Y" pipe exhaust on big block Mercruisers is good to about 350hp. If your motor is less hp than that, you will likely get zero performance increase by going thru transom.

MC
that is what I have read as well,,makes sense since the only people saying they picked up mph have 502s
which make more hp than that.
HTRDLNCN is offline  


Quick Reply: Expected Horsepower Increase From Through Prop to Through Hull?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.