Konrad swaps
#11
Banned
![](https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/images/icons/gold_member_star.gif)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 5,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I have just completed the Ace conversion. I had to add an adapter plate due to the angle of my transom so that caused some issues, but without that it is a very complete, well engineered kit. The quality of the product is unbelievable.
There is a thread in the Pantera section "Conversion in progress" with pictures and details.
If I can help you or provide any information, do not hesitate to email me: [email protected]
Kirk
There is a thread in the Pantera section "Conversion in progress" with pictures and details.
If I can help you or provide any information, do not hesitate to email me: [email protected]
Kirk
#12
Registered
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The Konrad Ace system is designed for a Bravo conversion. The motor stays in the same location as a Bravo, on the same front mount. We do have a rear mount inside the box, located off the trans tailstock, but we do recommend installing a rear motor plate.
As for speeds, the two 2005 Sonics (38'&42') that Doller Offshore converted last spring ran about 3 mph slower than the Bravo but had eliminated drive failure in these boats. These are boats that blew @ 10 Bravo drives in 2005. We now offer a shorty lower unit and hope to see speed numbers even closer.
[email protected]
As for speeds, the two 2005 Sonics (38'&42') that Doller Offshore converted last spring ran about 3 mph slower than the Bravo but had eliminated drive failure in these boats. These are boats that blew @ 10 Bravo drives in 2005. We now offer a shorty lower unit and hope to see speed numbers even closer.
[email protected]
In staggered configurations, does the tranny attach to the forward engine's bellhousing or in the stand off box at the end of the driveshaft?
#14
Registered
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Another would be how much does this weigh compared to a #6 , it's box and tranny? I would assume much less. Wouldn't transoms have to be beefed up to convert to the 6?
#15
Registered
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Staggered installations are very simple as the forward mounted motor is already mounted fore and aft and is fitted with a bellhousing that can accept a transmission. As mentioned above, no modifications to the transom other than bolting on our stand-off box.
To answer your questions concerning weight, the Konrad Ace system is about 150 lbs heavier than a Bravo. (trans adds 100 lbs)
Feel free to call anytime to discuss further,
Kurt 715-410-0735
[email protected]
Last edited by Biggus; 03-02-2007 at 07:33 PM.
#17
Registered
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This is how my merc driveshaft connects to my bellhousing and mounting plate. It is a unmodified ITS tailstock. Would your tranny just mount directly to this?
#18
Registered
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Kurt
Last edited by Biggus; 03-03-2007 at 05:42 AM.
#19
Registered
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Because in order to go between the bell and block would have required a too much material removal on the plate to clear the flywheel gear or a switch to steel (much thinner) instead of .500" aluminum. Everything is doweled, helicoiled and connected with ARP bolts. Although I have not run this exact set up before, I have run the mounting plate at the rear of the bell on two non staggered engines with no problems.
This picture was taken during mock up. I also had a major space issue finding the room to mount oil coolers and large heat exchangers for closed cooling. I though with staggered engines I was going to have tons of room to work with but in reality the stringer space was gobbled up very quickly with shifters, strainers, battery mounts, power steering coolers and prelubers etc. I don't want one extra inch of hose so getting the layout just right for all this to fit neatly would have clashed significantly with the plate being moved forward 5 inches.
The reason I am asking so many questions is because I am not confident my Merc ITS Sportmasters will hold up and I need to get prepared for what I may need to do about that.
For many many reasons, I would have gone side by sides if ordering the boat tomorrow. For one, Outdrive options would have included trannies in the bilge and Arneson drives. Both fo those options are off the table here.
This picture was taken during mock up. I also had a major space issue finding the room to mount oil coolers and large heat exchangers for closed cooling. I though with staggered engines I was going to have tons of room to work with but in reality the stringer space was gobbled up very quickly with shifters, strainers, battery mounts, power steering coolers and prelubers etc. I don't want one extra inch of hose so getting the layout just right for all this to fit neatly would have clashed significantly with the plate being moved forward 5 inches.
The reason I am asking so many questions is because I am not confident my Merc ITS Sportmasters will hold up and I need to get prepared for what I may need to do about that.
For many many reasons, I would have gone side by sides if ordering the boat tomorrow. For one, Outdrive options would have included trannies in the bilge and Arneson drives. Both fo those options are off the table here.
Last edited by 2112; 03-03-2007 at 12:30 PM.
#20
Registered
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I understand, space is limited. Are you going to run a custom coupler (deeper) to retain proper input shaft engagement?
Pretty cool project! I've been a big Ford fan for years
My high school car was a Pinto with a tunnel rammed, nitrous injected small block V-8 Ford, 9" 4:57 locker, Top Loader 4 speed
How big are your mills?
Kurt
Pretty cool project! I've been a big Ford fan for years
![Drink](/forums/images/smilies/drink.gif)
![Evil](/forums/images/smilies/evilB.gif)
![Big Grin](/forums/images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
How big are your mills?
Kurt