2000, 502 mag minor upgrades
#21
VIP Member
VIP Member
Back to the original post, any exaust change is going to be a increase, (power to weight ratio and exaust flow) just get rid of the cast stuff, other than that, make sure your props are running properly for you, a little adjusting on them can help alot.
#22
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: sint maarten
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
http://www.go-fast.com/boat_speed_predictions.htm
So what does a 32' fountain weight?
6500-7000lbs
with 830pshp 79mph
with 890pshp 82mph
24' Super
3700lbs
with 310, 65
with 340, 68
with 415, 75
with 445, 78
These are vary similar numbers that I have seen in the real world. 77.8mph is my best top speed to date.
So I guess the exhaust change is worth, "a few ponies"
Steve, you may want to consider changing your cast exhaust. It would give you 2mph...
38' Cig
10,000lbs
with 830pshp 65mph
with 890pshp 67mph
Hmmm...
So what does a 32' fountain weight?
6500-7000lbs
with 830pshp 79mph
with 890pshp 82mph
24' Super
3700lbs
with 310, 65
with 340, 68
with 415, 75
with 445, 78
These are vary similar numbers that I have seen in the real world. 77.8mph is my best top speed to date.
So I guess the exhaust change is worth, "a few ponies"
Steve, you may want to consider changing your cast exhaust. It would give you 2mph...
38' Cig
10,000lbs
with 830pshp 65mph
with 890pshp 67mph
Hmmm...
the boat came with gills already. please note that the weight is only one small component of the total drag... thats why that formula is condensed to that point. the real formula has a great many more variables but since we are considering an " apples to apples, those variables fall out ( so to speak). each boat has its own drag profile on that day and moment in time. my boat , for instance will be much slower w/ full tanks then w/ out... why ? because it will sit lower in the water and have much more parasitic drag. thats why just comparing lengths and and weights is not a valid comparison. a bad 24 ' lightweight hull will have a higher drag profile than a well designed slippery heavier 30' foot hull. thats why everybodys gains will be dependent on their boat specifically. but again... having said all that, once you start going really fast... over 60 mph ... the drag numbers get really big really quick. and thats where a lot more power is required... WHICH is not available ( in my opinion) from bolt on bells and whistles. the exhaust is the single real exception to that rule as you point out. they are heavy and they are horribly designed. putting ANYTHING else on actually FIXES a problem and is worth doing. beyond that tho i think its all just throwing money away as the dollars spent per performance gained ( again in my opinion ) doesn't justify it. the single biggest improvement i got on my boat was by increasing the airflow thru the engine compartment by an order of magnitude. that reduced the inlet temps hugely, the inlet manifold temps hugely and stabilized the oil temps precisely.
that bought me substantial performance.... NOT because i was making MORE than the 425 that the motors started out with but because they wern't breathing 150 deg contaminated air anymore and only making 395 or so as a result. all i did was make them work properly.
i just ran your numbers backwards... at 445 the numbers suggest for that drag profile as derived from your base line , a predicted top speed of 76 mph give or take... less than a 2 % error.... thats all you can ask from these sort of rough numbers.... thats 135 hp to go 13 mph faster... or more than a 43 % increase in power required for about a 20 % increase in top speed....
if we assume those sort of numbers are representitive you are talking about 830 x .43 or 356 MORE hp nec to go 13 mph... in my application, or 178 a side.... and if you plug THOSE numbers in and work them backwards into my original estimate of 125/side to do 10 mph youll find them almost spot on....
so... you see ? your observed data supports the math completely.
Last edited by stevesxm; 09-22-2007 at 10:30 AM.
#23
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
you are correct. your boat doesn't need that. and your math is not correct. the hp nec to overcome drag is cubed... not linear... you boat needs less because of the vastly less total drag at 60 than , say, mine which is 14 ft longer and probably 5000 lbs heavier. the post i was refering to above is by a guy with a much longer and heavier boat as well... so i scaled my numbers accordingly. my point is that i find the assertions made by some of significantly increased top speed from modifications that, on their face in most cases will buy a couple of % increase in total power more likely to be based on any number of other factors rather than the percieved gains.
and that was the point of this thread... and i still agree w/ griff. on a box stock 502 injected motor, i don't believe that small , non invasive mods will end up being cost effective from a performance stand point. i base that opinion on 30 yrs of doing the work for real and generating genuine and real hard data results. not someone that knows someone that heard about someone that put a MSD box on and went another 50 mph. and sure as hell some oversized flame arrestor isn't going to do anything at all. the exhaust will be worth 10 a side and the ecu will be worth 10 a side MAYBE... and 20 hp on a 34 ft boat isn't going to buy you as much as paying attention and getting the trim right.
and that was the point of this thread... and i still agree w/ griff. on a box stock 502 injected motor, i don't believe that small , non invasive mods will end up being cost effective from a performance stand point. i base that opinion on 30 yrs of doing the work for real and generating genuine and real hard data results. not someone that knows someone that heard about someone that put a MSD box on and went another 50 mph. and sure as hell some oversized flame arrestor isn't going to do anything at all. the exhaust will be worth 10 a side and the ecu will be worth 10 a side MAYBE... and 20 hp on a 34 ft boat isn't going to buy you as much as paying attention and getting the trim right.
#24
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: sint maarten
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
of course. absolutely correct. but the drag profile for THAT boat will remain consistant for that boat. you could find their drag number using their 90 mph numbers and 502 power as it sits and very accurately predict what their boat would do with whatever power increase you gave it. thats all im saying.
not trying to sell anybody anything. just keep the mythology apart from the science.
not trying to sell anybody anything. just keep the mythology apart from the science.
#25
VIP Member
VIP Member
Hey guys,
We can go around and around in circles. I think in the end we agree to some point. Whether we’re talking theory or practical experience, adding a little bit of power is going to push a boat faster to some degree.
Obviously making a small upgrade like better flowing exhaust (20-30HP) is going to help more on my little 24' Super vs. a 38' Cig. In this case, a 32' Fountain, probably somewhere in the middle.
The man asked what to do to gain power while leaving his engine basically stock. My answer is still the same; change the exhaust. Now if the 2-3mph increase is worth 2K per engine, that's up to him to determine.
Happy Boating.
We can go around and around in circles. I think in the end we agree to some point. Whether we’re talking theory or practical experience, adding a little bit of power is going to push a boat faster to some degree.
Obviously making a small upgrade like better flowing exhaust (20-30HP) is going to help more on my little 24' Super vs. a 38' Cig. In this case, a 32' Fountain, probably somewhere in the middle.
The man asked what to do to gain power while leaving his engine basically stock. My answer is still the same; change the exhaust. Now if the 2-3mph increase is worth 2K per engine, that's up to him to determine.
Happy Boating.
__________________
Patrick
Patrick
#26
Registered
I was going to stay out of this one since it was already way off-topic now but I couldn't resist trying the formula.
My boat runs a consistant 70mph with a stock 502 mag. I used 445hp since this is suppose to be the crankshaft hp #. This gave me a drag factor of 2398.792. With 500hp my boat would have a projected top speed of 72.76. If I use pshp I get a projected speed of 72.82. I would hope I would gain more that 2.6-2.9 mph! I have used the speed calculator before and have found it incredibly accurate IF you use accurate data to get your constant. Speed calc says 74mph using crank numbers and 75 using prop hp numbers.
Regardless this debate got started saying a boat needs 18% increase in power to pick up 3mph. This is simply not true "across the board". Some boats it is, but others it is not. And more importantly not true for the Fountain in question. Which is why we have these formulas and calculators.
I don't know what his fountain weighs or what the current speeds are. But I would guess that 60-80hp should get him 3mph. However, will exhaust give you the hp needed? IMO no but as Pat stated what else is there if he doesn't want to get into the engine?
I'm out!
#27
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: sint maarten
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Actually you MULTIPLY your new projected hp by your drag figure since you are backing it out.
I was going to stay out of this one since it was already way off-topic now but I couldn't resist trying the formula.
My boat runs a consistant 70mph with a stock 502 mag. I used 445hp since this is suppose to be the crankshaft hp #. This gave me a drag factor of 2398.792. With 500hp my boat would have a projected top speed of 72.76. If I use pshp I get a projected speed of 72.82. I would hope I would gain more that 2.6-2.9 mph! I have used the speed calculator before and have found it incredibly accurate IF you use accurate data to get your constant. Speed calc says 74mph using crank numbers and 75 using prop hp numbers.
Regardless this debate got started saying a boat needs 18% increase in power to pick up 3mph. This is simply not true "across the board". Some boats it is, but others it is not. And more importantly not true for the Fountain in question. Which is why we have these formulas and calculators.
I don't know what his fountain weighs or what the current speeds are. But I would guess that 60-80hp should get him 3mph. However, will exhaust give you the hp needed? IMO no but as Pat stated what else is there if he doesn't want to get into the engine?
I'm out!
I was going to stay out of this one since it was already way off-topic now but I couldn't resist trying the formula.
My boat runs a consistant 70mph with a stock 502 mag. I used 445hp since this is suppose to be the crankshaft hp #. This gave me a drag factor of 2398.792. With 500hp my boat would have a projected top speed of 72.76. If I use pshp I get a projected speed of 72.82. I would hope I would gain more that 2.6-2.9 mph! I have used the speed calculator before and have found it incredibly accurate IF you use accurate data to get your constant. Speed calc says 74mph using crank numbers and 75 using prop hp numbers.
Regardless this debate got started saying a boat needs 18% increase in power to pick up 3mph. This is simply not true "across the board". Some boats it is, but others it is not. And more importantly not true for the Fountain in question. Which is why we have these formulas and calculators.
I don't know what his fountain weighs or what the current speeds are. But I would guess that 60-80hp should get him 3mph. However, will exhaust give you the hp needed? IMO no but as Pat stated what else is there if he doesn't want to get into the engine?
I'm out!
no. hp = drag * v cubed.
if you know the drag and you know the v cubed, your NEW v cubed will be the NEW hp DIVIDED by the same drag number.
and what the number show absolutely is that getting the drag down in whatever way you can is a lot more effective at buying you speed then just adding more power. and a lot cheaper generally. for instance... i just stopped being stupid when i gassed up. i started by always filling... duhhhh boat slowed right down. i started doing 1/2 fills.... boat came right out of the water and drag went down and everything was much better. simple and cost me nothing.
none of these calculations are aimed at having a 0 % margin of error. they are aimed at the decision making process.
this is what i have
this is how fast i go
this is how fast i WANT to go......
is it cost effective to make the power to do it ?
if the numbers say you need 50 hp... then it doesn't matter whether its really 55 or 45.... all it means is that it is an easily achievable number. if the number ( as was my case ) was 125 hp per motor or more, then that told me everything i needed to know about the cost effectiveness of that decision.
Last edited by stevesxm; 09-23-2007 at 07:17 AM.
#28
Registered
You originally had to divide velocity cubed by your horsepower. So, you have to MULTIPLY to work it backwards.
70mph x 1.46 = 102.20(Velocity)
Now cube that number = 1067462.648
Now divide that by current hp, 1067462.648/445=2398.792
To work it backwards using the drag number
MULTIPLY, NOT DIVIDE your projected hp by the drag number, 500x2398.792 = 1199396.233
Cube root of 1199396.233 = 106.24
Now DIVIDE Velocity by 1.46 = 72.76
It's a decent formula but I'll stick with the speed calculator. More accurate and MUCH easier! LOL
70mph x 1.46 = 102.20(Velocity)
Now cube that number = 1067462.648
Now divide that by current hp, 1067462.648/445=2398.792
To work it backwards using the drag number
MULTIPLY, NOT DIVIDE your projected hp by the drag number, 500x2398.792 = 1199396.233
Cube root of 1199396.233 = 106.24
Now DIVIDE Velocity by 1.46 = 72.76
It's a decent formula but I'll stick with the speed calculator. More accurate and MUCH easier! LOL
#29
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: sint maarten
Posts: 1,491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
your algebra needs work.
if you divide by hp you leave nothing on that side of the equation and end up having to move the drag number to that side as an inverse function.
hp ( 455) = d * 70 cubed ( don't even bother going to fps...)
455 = d * 343,000
455 / 343,000 = d = .00132
so working backwards from KNOWN d and hp
500 = .00132 * v cubed
DIVIDE 500 by .00132 to get V cubed = 378,887
cube root 378,887 = 72.04 mph
if you divide by hp you leave nothing on that side of the equation and end up having to move the drag number to that side as an inverse function.
hp ( 455) = d * 70 cubed ( don't even bother going to fps...)
455 = d * 343,000
455 / 343,000 = d = .00132
so working backwards from KNOWN d and hp
500 = .00132 * v cubed
DIVIDE 500 by .00132 to get V cubed = 378,887
cube root 378,887 = 72.04 mph
#30
Registered
Ahhh, my bad I read this incorrectly:
I did the opposite and divided the hp into the total number(343,000/445=). And FYI since we are using the same numers you get the same answer no matter which way you divide them.
Like I said, I'll stick with the calc since it's faster and more accurate! But that is a nice formula and it was nice to strain my brain!
Like I said, I'll stick with the calc since it's faster and more accurate! But that is a nice formula and it was nice to strain my brain!
Last edited by onesickpantera; 09-23-2007 at 12:42 PM.