Help me understand blower sizes
#1
Charter Member #927
![](https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/images/icons/charter_member_star.gif)
Thread Starter
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I know 671 and 871 are based on the old Detroit Diesel 671 and v871 engines. The 71 being the cylinder size and the 6,8 or 16 for that matter means the number of cylinders. What about a wieand 177 and 250 or Holley/B&M 174 and 250? Are the related to the 53 series engine or the smaller 71 series. I know DD made them as small as 353 and 271. I have owned these engines as stationary power units.
Thanks for any help.
Mark
Thanks for any help.
Mark
#4
MarineKinetics
![](https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/images/icons/platinum_member_star.gif)
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The numerical designation for the original GM Roots type blowers were based on the engine displacement the blower was designed for.
Example;
6-71 blowers were designed for:
6 (cylinders) 71 (CID per cylinder)
This, however, does not signify the actual displacement per revolution of the supercharger. The actual displacement per revolution is determined by the rotor length and diameter.
The data for GM based Roots blowers are:-
6:71 small diameter
Rotor dia=5.505", length=14.975", displacement per full turn of rotor=339CI.
6:71 big diameter
Rotor dia=5.778", length=14.975", displacement per full turn of rotor=411CI.
8:71
Rotor dia=5.778", length=15.905", displacement per full turn of rotor=436CI.
10:71
Rotor dia=5.778", length=17.000", displacement per full turn of rotor=466CI.
14:71
Rotor dia=5.778", length=19.000", displacement per full turn of rotor=521CI
This is theoretical displacement.
Retro or high helix will change this considerably.
A worn blower will reduce this a little.
A very good tight new blower and a Teflon stripped blower should be about the same.
Bob
Example;
6-71 blowers were designed for:
6 (cylinders) 71 (CID per cylinder)
This, however, does not signify the actual displacement per revolution of the supercharger. The actual displacement per revolution is determined by the rotor length and diameter.
The data for GM based Roots blowers are:-
6:71 small diameter
Rotor dia=5.505", length=14.975", displacement per full turn of rotor=339CI.
6:71 big diameter
Rotor dia=5.778", length=14.975", displacement per full turn of rotor=411CI.
8:71
Rotor dia=5.778", length=15.905", displacement per full turn of rotor=436CI.
10:71
Rotor dia=5.778", length=17.000", displacement per full turn of rotor=466CI.
14:71
Rotor dia=5.778", length=19.000", displacement per full turn of rotor=521CI
This is theoretical displacement.
Retro or high helix will change this considerably.
A worn blower will reduce this a little.
A very good tight new blower and a Teflon stripped blower should be about the same.
Bob
#5
Charter Member #927
![](https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/images/icons/charter_member_star.gif)
Thread Starter
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So, when you get a Wieand or BDS 671 blower, How do you know if it's the small diameter or large? You are only talking a 1/4" diferance .
#6
MarineKinetics
![](https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/images/icons/platinum_member_star.gif)
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Payton,
The .273" difference is relative, as seen in the 72 CFM increase per revolution over the smaller diameter rotor. The Weiand 6-71 is the 5.778" diameter rotor.
Bob
The .273" difference is relative, as seen in the 72 CFM increase per revolution over the smaller diameter rotor. The Weiand 6-71 is the 5.778" diameter rotor.
Bob
#7
Charter Member #927
![](https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/images/icons/charter_member_star.gif)
Thread Starter
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What makes the difference of going to dual carbs from one bigger one? Proper fuel distribution with more air? I see the 250 is availible with a single or dual.
Would you need a dual carb setup with a 671 blower if you are spinning it slow for only 3# of boost? Or is the total cfm of air goingto be to high for a single to do the job.
Would you need a dual carb setup with a 671 blower if you are spinning it slow for only 3# of boost? Or is the total cfm of air goingto be to high for a single to do the job.
#8
Gold Member
![](https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/images/icons/gold_member_star.gif)
Join Date: May 2002
Location: DFW
Posts: 1,127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
We know that by changing pulley ratio,boost pressure will change...assuming 5# boost is to be the magic number,that is obtainable with pulley ratio.
However,with regards to overdrive vs. underdrive one must consider available boost delivery.Hence,SIZE of the required supercharger...Some prefer a model that can be underdriven...The underdriven ratio provides max. pressure at about the same engine rpm, or just before, full timing occurs...Thereafter,the pressure gradient is flat through the increasing engine RPM range.
However,with regards to overdrive vs. underdrive one must consider available boost delivery.Hence,SIZE of the required supercharger...Some prefer a model that can be underdriven...The underdriven ratio provides max. pressure at about the same engine rpm, or just before, full timing occurs...Thereafter,the pressure gradient is flat through the increasing engine RPM range.
#10
Charter Member # 55
![](https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/images/icons/charter_member_star.gif)
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
rmb, Thanks for the education. I did not know the exact specifics.
What about the 177 and 250 series blowers???? Are they pushing the 177 and 250 ci of air, theoretically????
Yes a B&M 420 is essentially the same size as a 6-71.
Almost everybody, runs a single carb on the 250/256 blowers. The larger blowers need dual carbs for better fuel distribution and for more fuel.
What about the 177 and 250 series blowers???? Are they pushing the 177 and 250 ci of air, theoretically????
Yes a B&M 420 is essentially the same size as a 6-71.
Almost everybody, runs a single carb on the 250/256 blowers. The larger blowers need dual carbs for better fuel distribution and for more fuel.