Whipple problems
#41
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Rapid City SD
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
WildThing, It was a new boat with very little hours, so we did not change the head gaskets. Our hopes are that they used a different head gasket on the 496HO. If he blows the head gasket, we will just have to change it. We couldn't find anyone that had done this before, so we just went for it. He went from a consistant 68mph to a solid 83mph and has hit 84. I would think there are other people on here that have done it since then. I know there are some that have ProCharged.
#42
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Tulsa, OK, Grand, Beaver, LOTO
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by WildThing
28Eliminator,
15 mph is good but I thought a cat hull could do even better.
Especially since a cat is so efficient and he added at least 200hp.
This makes me think a v hull would come up short of his numbers.
What drive did he run? Prop before & after?
How much boost did you run?
Is this motor still running strong?
Thanks for your input
Ron
15 mph is good but I thought a cat hull could do even better.
Especially since a cat is so efficient and he added at least 200hp.
This makes me think a v hull would come up short of his numbers.
What drive did he run? Prop before & after?
How much boost did you run?
Is this motor still running strong?
Thanks for your input
Ron
A single 28 elim Daytona is a lot of boat for that type of power and that whipple kit is relativley mild- maybe 600 ponies if I recall (I sell them). In a similar example- I bought my 01 25 Daytona new with the 454 mag. I went from 67 to 88 GPS after the whipple going from a 22- 28" Bravo. the following yr I changed to an imco shorty, added a spacer for 1.5" shorter x, picked up 11 more for 99.0 with a labbed 30.
In a similar way, it takes a lot of power for your Pantera, at 1120 feet I was running 73ish with the stock 575, now 78ish (so far) after boosting it to 650 at the crank.
#43
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Rapid City SD
Posts: 809
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Sorry Ron, I should have specified that it was on a V and not a cat.
I would think that on a cat, it would make more of an increase also. It has an XZ Bravo with 1.36 ratio and went from a 24 bravo at something like 4600rpm to a Bravo 26 spinning around 5200rpm. It is running 5lbs of boost, and still no signs of any problems, but it only has about 50 hours since the upgrade.
I would think that on a cat, it would make more of an increase also. It has an XZ Bravo with 1.36 ratio and went from a 24 bravo at something like 4600rpm to a Bravo 26 spinning around 5200rpm. It is running 5lbs of boost, and still no signs of any problems, but it only has about 50 hours since the upgrade.