Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Dyno proven 675-700 HP 540CI recipes? >

Dyno proven 675-700 HP 540CI recipes?

Notices

Dyno proven 675-700 HP 540CI recipes?

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-03-2015, 10:04 AM
  #151  
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
 
Full Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh
Posts: 11,636
Likes: 0
Received 209 Likes on 133 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TAStevens
I was originally going to go 540...doesn't cost any more to go 572...were starting from the ground up so went Tall deck Dart Blocks
If I had hatch height I would have also, already limited to 4150 carbs as it is
Full Force is offline  
Old 08-03-2015, 10:10 AM
  #152  
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
 
Full Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh
Posts: 11,636
Likes: 0
Received 209 Likes on 133 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
They were specd by chris straub. The guy who got laughed at and banned from oso by some of the in crowd. I was a bit skeptical at first, but he hit the power goal at a much lower rpm , without having to rev the engine with small props and bad cruise speed. The heads were new afr 335s, that had guides honed to spec, valve jobs touched up, flowed, etc. Im sure with big dyno headers they would have cracked 800 at 6000rpm.
Wow.....
Full Force is offline  
Old 08-03-2015, 03:11 PM
  #153  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Between A Womans Leggs in IL
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Full Force
Ran Labbed 23 Mirage's this weekend, engines went 5800@73 mph, zing right up, so basically the power band is too high for my 25's, I think I will lab mine up to the best I can and call it a day, boat should run 73-75 and reliable.... at least I know they are not held back by ignition and such...
i told you to advance the cam 2* ..lol
FIXX is offline  
Old 08-03-2015, 03:16 PM
  #154  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Between A Womans Leggs in IL
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

[QUOTE=Full Force;4337502]I am, 241/246, too high according to a few guys, proven engine builders....

Originally Posted by SB
240 at .050" in a 540 is a stump puller cam. Especially with good heads. schit, in a 10:1 454 it will pull buildings at 3500
advancing the cams will give you more low end..will also take away from max rpms..
FIXX is offline  
Old 08-03-2015, 03:21 PM
  #155  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Between A Womans Leggs in IL
Posts: 6,306
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
Back when you were planning out these builds, was a 572+ci ever brought up? In the grand scheme since you buying new, it wouldnt have cost much more. The 540 platform was popular because most had std deck 502 mercs and stroked them , so it was the obvious choice.

A buddy of mine just did some 572s , 10:1, afr heads with some cleanup work, victor jr, 1200 dominator, custom cam , engines made gobs of torque, and 770ish hp at 6000 thru small cmi headers
if it were me i would have built 632s..talk about stump pullers for ths almost same money..
FIXX is offline  
Old 08-03-2015, 04:10 PM
  #156  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,886
Received 144 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

If it were me I would've just bought an Outerlimits boat with 5000hp.
Baja Rooster is offline  
Old 08-03-2015, 04:18 PM
  #157  
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
 
Full Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh
Posts: 11,636
Likes: 0
Received 209 Likes on 133 Posts
Default

I put cam in where instructed to, and every single person I talked to said it wont change it that much to make it worth taking all apart.....

Originally Posted by FIXX
i told you to advance the cam 2* ..lol
Full Force is offline  
Old 08-03-2015, 04:59 PM
  #158  
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
 
Full Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh
Posts: 11,636
Likes: 0
Received 209 Likes on 133 Posts
Default

Two reasons....

#1 TRS

#2 hatch height

Nuff said lol was not a money issue at all...

Originally Posted by FIXX
if it were me i would have built 632s..talk about stump pullers for ths almost same money..
Full Force is offline  
Old 08-03-2015, 06:58 PM
  #159  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
vintage chromoly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: cleveland ohio
Posts: 2,639
Received 17 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

No need for a 10.2" block.
A 9.8 will provide a 572" engine.

4.375 stroke
4.560 bore
vintage chromoly is offline  
Old 08-03-2015, 07:09 PM
  #160  
Registered
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yep
TAStevens is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.