Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Why is the Gen 7 496 such a bad platform to build >

Why is the Gen 7 496 such a bad platform to build

Notices

Why is the Gen 7 496 such a bad platform to build

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-28-2016, 09:06 PM
  #181  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I run a modified intake also but it has been completely dissected and given the full Monty including the four bolt flange. I ran a 90mm then added a 2 inch spacer which picked up power on the dyno. Then went to a 102mm and flared the spacer to match and picked up more power.
Vortec Bandit is offline  
Old 01-28-2016, 09:16 PM
  #182  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Keith, you may be interested in this. By modifying/lengthening the fuel rail transfer tube between the rails and adding a bend, filling the original injector bosses, 're-machining the bosses to point the injectors upstream created an additional 8hp.
Vortec Bandit is offline  
Old 01-29-2016, 02:34 PM
  #183  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Crystal Lake, IL
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by BUP
Post 173 who made your covers - very nice and IMO the more it is vented the better.
Not sure who they are, I know F&M make them but these are not theirs. Some guy had them listed on PBSS in a red metallic and said he had them for years, so good chance it was a small West Coast shop that was working with a boat company long gone ;(
Naughty Kitty is offline  
Old 01-29-2016, 07:19 PM
  #184  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Delray Beach, FL
Posts: 3,747
Received 866 Likes on 325 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vortec Bandit
I run a modified intake also but it has been completely dissected and given the full Monty including the four bolt flange. I ran a 90mm then added a 2 inch spacer which picked up power on the dyno. Then went to a 102mm and flared the spacer to match and picked up more power.
I have Raylar intakes. Would it work?
Keith Atlanta is offline  
Old 01-30-2016, 05:45 AM
  #185  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Clarkston, Michigan
Posts: 5,825
Received 607 Likes on 275 Posts
Default

My 496 before I swapped in a 525EFI:

thirdchildhood is offline  
Old 02-02-2016, 01:37 AM
  #186  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 2,777
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Yeah of course it'll work with our manifolds!

Cut the front 78mm snout off and bolt on a 102. We've done lots of 90 / 102 conversions with the Cool Gap. Heck, we even do it with the modified stock manifolds now:


Raylar is offline  
Old 02-10-2016, 05:36 AM
  #187  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Rage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Vortec Bandit
Keith, you may be interested in this. By modifying/lengthening the fuel rail transfer tube between the rails and adding a bend, filling the original injector bosses, 're-machining the bosses to point the injectors upstream created an additional 8hp.
Any dyno sheet available?
Rage is offline  
Old 03-14-2016, 08:35 AM
  #188  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
donzi matt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Moultonborough NH
Posts: 1,356
Received 31 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Spring is around the corner and I am thinking about getting the final projects done on my motors before dropping them back in. I want to upgrade the stock oil coolers but don't think I want to do anything with the stock lines. My thinking is to go to a 3" cooler with a thermostat in the stock location with some new brackets. This is the cooler I am looking at: 3" cooler from CP Performance. The stock 496 ties the air drain system into this but my Dana exhaust has a manual valve so I can do away with the funky T fitting at the end of the cooler for the water hoses. Has anybody had any experience with doing a setup like this and if so how did it work for keeping oil temperatures under control?
donzi matt is offline  
Old 03-14-2016, 02:46 PM
  #189  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Further South East of Dome Island
Posts: 2,034
Received 34 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Bore... or lack there of..
Pismo10 is offline  
Old 03-14-2016, 03:11 PM
  #190  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tygart Lake, WV
Posts: 1,295
Received 125 Likes on 85 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by donzi matt
Spring is around the corner and I am thinking about getting the final projects done on my motors before dropping them back in. I want to upgrade the stock oil coolers but don't think I want to do anything with the stock lines. My thinking is to go to a 3" cooler with a thermostat in the stock location with some new brackets. This is the cooler I am looking at: 3" cooler from CP Performance. The stock 496 ties the air drain system into this but my Dana exhaust has a manual valve so I can do away with the funky T fitting at the end of the cooler for the water hoses. Has anybody had any experience with doing a setup like this and if so how did it work for keeping oil temperatures under control?
Your on the right track. Anything is an upgrade over the stock unit. That size should do a fine job for your needs. If I remember your setup to monitor oil temp.
Ryan00TJ is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.