Detonation Issues - "Why is the Gen 7 496 such a bad platform to build"
#81
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,667
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personally, two takes on this.
1. Bob Loyd has done more on this than just about anyone else and I always support his incredibly well-written story from the 496 Myth Busting Thread.
2. 12.5 - and you have to take into account that not all O2 sensors and equipment will read the same. Leave yourself a small bit of headroom. It won't cost a thing. We learned a lot by making sure the exhaust was 'completely' dry vs. what is the case in most boat engines. All headers leak and you have to manage the collector area. It's simple maint; nothing more. Most of the people using a stock 496 with the cast pistons will enjoy a longer life if they sipmly raised the FP 2 LBS. It's more of a matter of fuel cooling the pistons and not so much for AFR or tuning. That engine came from GM Powertrain with AC Delco 41983 spark plugs. DUMB in a boat. Bump fuel slightly and put something like #8's in it. Works great.
Remember, fuel makes HP. Period. To run a marine engine on the lean edge is not giong to work. Just be slightly on the fat side of lean, watch the plugs and enjoy your boat. Raylar spent a lot of time designing a combustion chamber to promote a fast burn and there for requires less total timing for best power. Even with the latest stuff going on with the Dart Gen 7 we wound up with mostly a 28 degree setting. The learn table is + or - but that's the number.
1. Bob Loyd has done more on this than just about anyone else and I always support his incredibly well-written story from the 496 Myth Busting Thread.
2. 12.5 - and you have to take into account that not all O2 sensors and equipment will read the same. Leave yourself a small bit of headroom. It won't cost a thing. We learned a lot by making sure the exhaust was 'completely' dry vs. what is the case in most boat engines. All headers leak and you have to manage the collector area. It's simple maint; nothing more. Most of the people using a stock 496 with the cast pistons will enjoy a longer life if they sipmly raised the FP 2 LBS. It's more of a matter of fuel cooling the pistons and not so much for AFR or tuning. That engine came from GM Powertrain with AC Delco 41983 spark plugs. DUMB in a boat. Bump fuel slightly and put something like #8's in it. Works great.
Remember, fuel makes HP. Period. To run a marine engine on the lean edge is not giong to work. Just be slightly on the fat side of lean, watch the plugs and enjoy your boat. Raylar spent a lot of time designing a combustion chamber to promote a fast burn and there for requires less total timing for best power. Even with the latest stuff going on with the Dart Gen 7 we wound up with mostly a 28 degree setting. The learn table is + or - but that's the number.
I would like to get back to the initial question that started this thread.
Question. What is the leanest naturally aspirated engine AFR [ with GM Gen VII 8.1L, Merc 496HO heads] that is safe from detonation damage from idle to 2200 rpm? Plane out is ~2200 RPM. Significant MAP/engine load increase begins at ~4000 rpm. Knowledgeable responses only please.
Question. What is the leanest naturally aspirated engine AFR [ with GM Gen VII 8.1L, Merc 496HO heads] that is safe from detonation damage from idle to 2200 rpm? Plane out is ~2200 RPM. Significant MAP/engine load increase begins at ~4000 rpm. Knowledgeable responses only please.
#82
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#83
Registered
How does it go by identifying the knocking cylinder with only two knock sensors? Does it just go off of crank position at the time of the spike to determine which cylinder it is?
#84
Registered
Good question DM - we know individual misfires are found that way, but knock ? That would be cool.
#85
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personally, two takes on this.
1. Bob Loyd has done more on this than just about anyone else and I always support his incredibly well-written story from the 496 Myth Busting Thread.
2. 12.5 - and you have to take into account that not all O2 sensors and equipment will read the same. Leave yourself a small bit of headroom. It won't cost a thing. We learned a lot by making sure the exhaust was 'completely' dry vs. what is the case in most boat engines. All headers leak and you have to manage the collector area. It's simple maint; nothing more. Most of the people using a stock 496 with the cast pistons will enjoy a longer life if they sipmly raised the FP 2 LBS. It's more of a matter of fuel cooling the pistons and not so much for AFR or tuning. That engine came from GM Powertrain with AC Delco 41983 spark plugs. DUMB in a boat. Bump fuel slightly and put something like #8's in it. Works great.
Remember, fuel makes HP. Period. To run a marine engine on the lean edge is not giong to work. Just be slightly on the fat side of lean, watch the plugs and enjoy your boat. Raylar spent a lot of time designing a combustion chamber to promote a fast burn and there for requires less total timing for best power. Even with the latest stuff going on with the Dart Gen 7 we wound up with mostly a 28 degree setting. The learn table is + or - but that's the number.
1. Bob Loyd has done more on this than just about anyone else and I always support his incredibly well-written story from the 496 Myth Busting Thread.
2. 12.5 - and you have to take into account that not all O2 sensors and equipment will read the same. Leave yourself a small bit of headroom. It won't cost a thing. We learned a lot by making sure the exhaust was 'completely' dry vs. what is the case in most boat engines. All headers leak and you have to manage the collector area. It's simple maint; nothing more. Most of the people using a stock 496 with the cast pistons will enjoy a longer life if they sipmly raised the FP 2 LBS. It's more of a matter of fuel cooling the pistons and not so much for AFR or tuning. That engine came from GM Powertrain with AC Delco 41983 spark plugs. DUMB in a boat. Bump fuel slightly and put something like #8's in it. Works great.
Remember, fuel makes HP. Period. To run a marine engine on the lean edge is not giong to work. Just be slightly on the fat side of lean, watch the plugs and enjoy your boat. Raylar spent a lot of time designing a combustion chamber to promote a fast burn and there for requires less total timing for best power. Even with the latest stuff going on with the Dart Gen 7 we wound up with mostly a 28 degree setting. The learn table is + or - but that's the number.
Item 2. Lot of good info and perspective, thanks. I need to bore down on your earlier comment "if you are using a bosch type sensor with the Innovate hand-held then i'd recommend setting it almost one point richer compared to say an NTK in a nice, dry environment." Are you saying that all Bosch sensors consistently read almost one point leaner that an NTK sensor? If yes how did that fact come to your attention? Did you try both with your Holley EFI and saw this relationship or some other info source?
So the 600HO dyno test was run with 27* max timing with AFR in the mid 13's with I assume 89 octane and your Holley EFI chose 28* for your motor with the same heads and ~12.5 AFR and ? octane. Since the Raylar heads are faster burn than the GM 8.1L heads one can believe that the GM heads should need more timing to be optimum for similar conditions. Of course the unanswered question is how much more. I remember seeing a Tyler Crocket comment on the Dart 8.1L heads with 107 cc chambers that 31* is about it with 91 octane but of course those are Dart not the GM heads. My chambers used to be 111 cc's with 87 octane 12.8 AFR and 32* based on the dyno EGR tuned GM HP3 Gen 1 engine heads. Interesting. Would you consider 12.8 on the fat side of lean?
Last edited by Rage; 11-20-2015 at 06:40 PM.
#86
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#87
Gold Member
Gold Member
Rage and SD Fever need to chime in on this but... I am pretty sure that Whipple ECU reprogram reduces the knock sensor sensitivity as the performance characteristics increase due to cam lope and other variables. Its been awhile so I only remeber this tidbit.
To add to that, he specifically did on mine due to the stellings box universal joint vibration causing interference.
#88
Registered
*I think it may loos some of that capability as performance increases.
Rage and SD Fever need to chime in on this but... I am pretty sure that Whipple ECU reprogram reduces the knock sensor sensitivity as the performance characteristics increase due to cam lope and other variables. Its been awhile so I only remeber this tidbit.
To add to that, he specifically did on mine due to the stellings box universal joint vibration causing interference.
Rage and SD Fever need to chime in on this but... I am pretty sure that Whipple ECU reprogram reduces the knock sensor sensitivity as the performance characteristics increase due to cam lope and other variables. Its been awhile so I only remeber this tidbit.
To add to that, he specifically did on mine due to the stellings box universal joint vibration causing interference.
Found this..... FWIW
Originally Posted by Raylar
knock sensor Mercury uses with the program that Mercury has programmed into the PCM is preset to recognize distinctive knock signals in the 496. When the ECM sees a definite knock event over a predetermined time and intensity it will add fuel on a Bank A or Bank B basis, not on a cylinder by cylinder basis. This is why there are two knock sensors on this motor. The program will also, at the same time start subtracting ignition timing to preset levels for a period of time until the knock stops. If the knocking is large and over a longer period of time the PCM555 program will actualy set a code and go into a "Guardian" reduced power mode to hopefully reduce damage to the engine. the PCM555 is programmed to record certain knock events and record their frequency.
#89
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
*I think it may loos some of that capability as performance increases.
Rage and SD Fever need to chime in on this but... I am pretty sure that Whipple ECU reprogram reduces the knock sensor sensitivity as the performance characteristics increase due to cam lope and other variables. Its been awhile so I only remeber this tidbit.
To add to that, he specifically did on mine due to the stellings box universal joint vibration causing interference.
Rage and SD Fever need to chime in on this but... I am pretty sure that Whipple ECU reprogram reduces the knock sensor sensitivity as the performance characteristics increase due to cam lope and other variables. Its been awhile so I only remeber this tidbit.
To add to that, he specifically did on mine due to the stellings box universal joint vibration causing interference.
#90
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Holley EFI
Questions for those with the Holley EFI. When the Holley EFI detects a knock event what is its response capability?
Spark
1. Retards spark all cylinders in response to knock event?
2. Retards spark on cylinder bank where knock event detected?
3. Retards spark on cylinder where knock event detected?
Fuel
1. Provides more fuel all cylinders in response to knock event?
2. Provides more fuel on cylinder bank where knock event detected?
3. Provides more fuel on cylinder where knock event detected?
What if any adjustments are available to tailor how the spark retardation is performed?
1. What is trigger to start retardation? knock amplitude? knock vibration frequency? quantity of knocks/sec?
2. What is trigger to stop retardation? knock amplitude? knock vibration frequency? quantity of knocks/sec?
3. Is there a programmable relationship between knock severity and retardation severity?
If there is something online that explains all this that would be great.
Spark
1. Retards spark all cylinders in response to knock event?
2. Retards spark on cylinder bank where knock event detected?
3. Retards spark on cylinder where knock event detected?
Fuel
1. Provides more fuel all cylinders in response to knock event?
2. Provides more fuel on cylinder bank where knock event detected?
3. Provides more fuel on cylinder where knock event detected?
What if any adjustments are available to tailor how the spark retardation is performed?
1. What is trigger to start retardation? knock amplitude? knock vibration frequency? quantity of knocks/sec?
2. What is trigger to stop retardation? knock amplitude? knock vibration frequency? quantity of knocks/sec?
3. Is there a programmable relationship between knock severity and retardation severity?
If there is something online that explains all this that would be great.