SBC cam spec help!!??
#12
Registered
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dayton, OH/Burnside KY
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
4 Posts
I'm really interested to see what kind of power you make with this and where the torque comes in at. I have built a 408ci LS2 that I am putting in my boat, and I also called Bob Madera for my cam. We ended up using one that is 242/250 .621/.613 112*ls. I ended up having lightning build me a set of headers and when he built them he extended the collector out past the back of the header to help fight reversion. I can actually extend it even more if I want, but I think it'll be ok where its at. As of now, the water won't mix into the exhaust till its almost at the transom.
#13
If it were me the 230/236 would/should work on that size motor but I would prefer a 114LSA. As SB noted you can afford more lift. For reference I'm at 221/230 on a 114LSA with .525/.545" on a 1.5 rocker in a 377 cid motor. No reversion noted to date.
#14
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I am actually waiting on a call back from Bob so i can give him exact numbers on my heads/flows/ect.. We will see what his suggestion is but from what brief conversation we had when he started my build sheet he says definitely 230s and running the riser extension the way i am going to will be perfect to fight against reversion. Will report back once i know more. Not sure if it'd be out of courteous or not to give all the specs he suggest but if he doesn't care ill let them fly. Corey, i may not know SBC marine engines very well but i do know my way around a LSX motor very well. With you running a 4"+ bore whether you are running cathedral port or rectangular port those heads react a little different to cam specs than SBCs.
#16
Never dyno'd it but netted between 10-12 mph increase over stock 350 Mag in a beamy slow hull. I've also left power on the table with smaller runner size. I would estimate between 370-412 hp. I know that's a big bracket but that's my guess. I've been trying to prop shaft dyno it but getting the time to do it is difficult.
#17
Registered
20 less cubes one less foot and about 800lbs less hull with a vp dp very similar sbc stroker build gets real close to 80 without going too far past 6k rpm. May have a little wiggle room for fancy exhaust water dump options with that particular exhaust set up.
A hot 434" smallblock bravo combo can dump some serious water in the exhaust
A hot 434" smallblock bravo combo can dump some serious water in the exhaust
#18
Registered
I am actually waiting on a call back from Bob so i can give him exact numbers on my heads/flows/ect.. We will see what his suggestion is but from what brief conversation we had when he started my build sheet he says definitely 230s and running the riser extension the way i am going to will be perfect to fight against reversion. Will report back once i know more. Not sure if it'd be out of courteous or not to give all the specs he suggest but if he doesn't care ill let them fly. Corey, i may not know SBC marine engines very well but i do know my way around a LSX motor very well. With you running a 4"+ bore whether you are running cathedral port or rectangular port those heads react a little different to cam specs than SBCs.
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/rxT0vfMSJDM" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
#19
Registered
Last edited by SB; 01-07-2016 at 09:18 AM.
#20
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 79
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Talked with him today to give him final head porting specs/valve sizes and flow numbers i had availible. Says more than likely 230s intake 240s exhaust. Im goimg to have it idle around 800-850 and he seems to think with the way i will extend the risers reversion shouldnt be an issue. So i guess we will see. Guess too many people haven't put a good bit more power in these boats? He thinks 575ish should be achievable with a stout leg in it but told him how we cruise im looking for 75-80% out of 100 on cam size vs power scale.