Supercharged v NA
#41
Platinum Member
![](https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/images/icons/platinum_member_star.gif)
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
There is another 41 Apache with like 1100hp I passed on a poker run and he was on the phone I believe with the engine builder in the parking lot when we got back from the run. My buddy herd him tell the guy it was loud don't think it made since to him that a supercharged boat lost to a NA boat. LOL
Last edited by 14 apache; 03-05-2016 at 11:43 AM.
#42
Registered
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Which motor will live longer the blown motor or the NA motor?
#43
Registered
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
engines with equil hp the supercharged engine should last longer,espically the valve train.
#44
Registered
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
can you tell i am a supercharger guy,lol.
#45
Platinum Member
![](https://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/images/icons/platinum_member_star.gif)
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Thought this was interesting to post.
900 SC, [email protected], 252, lift is .672
Exhaust@ .050. 257, lift is .672
My 598 NA Injected engines needed cams like this to make good power.
.050 I275
.050 E283
.750 lift to make 900hp at 6000. 960hp at 6700. Around 840ftlb tq
The weight of the 2.4 intake valve was tearing up the cam lobe. after about 5 years.
900 SC, [email protected], 252, lift is .672
Exhaust@ .050. 257, lift is .672
My 598 NA Injected engines needed cams like this to make good power.
.050 I275
.050 E283
.750 lift to make 900hp at 6000. 960hp at 6700. Around 840ftlb tq
The weight of the 2.4 intake valve was tearing up the cam lobe. after about 5 years.
#47
Banned
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
engines with equil hp the supercharged engine should last longer,espically the valve train.
Last edited by horsepower1; 03-05-2016 at 07:14 PM.
#48
Banned
#49
Registered
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
only because i did not know you were joking.
#50
Registered