Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
AFR 325 flow sheets.... anyone ever flow these heads? >

AFR 325 flow sheets.... anyone ever flow these heads?

Notices

AFR 325 flow sheets.... anyone ever flow these heads?

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-30-2017, 04:10 PM
  #541  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,305
Received 1,494 Likes on 808 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Full Force
I gotta be honest, after the constant bashing of myself, and the person helping me with people continuing to tell me I'm going to fail, I am not into sharing the details, why? So I can be told my heads suck? My port work sucks? My cams are wrong? My new lifters suck? Why didn't I do this or that? I'm over it... I am making the best of the situation I have.... that's not good for guys here...I keep getting beat up about it
I just wanna know how much slower you go? Lol.
getrdunn is offline  
Old 01-30-2017, 04:13 PM
  #542  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,886
Received 144 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by getrdunn
This is where I beg to differ. wtf. First off not to many NA 900 hp boat engines out cruising around. So let's do a more realistic comparison. 700 NA vs 700 SC. Same driving characteristics. No way. Notta. I know this cause my partner had SC and myself NA twin app same hulls and he'd stop at every port possible to fuel up. More efficient??? Research how much hp it takes to get 900 hp SC.

Didn't matter how we ran either. Regardless I don't pay attention to fuel and doubt it will bankrupt me only having a 2 1/2 month season so either way I could care less. I run hard and when I need fuel I get it.
It takes more fuel on the sc setup just to compensate for the extra drag of the blower, I would think. But wind drag is a far bigger issue. Same hulls, but who had the passengers with the biggest...dock bumpers...hanging in the wind? I've seen drivers throttle hard to dislodge them from their carriers.
Baja Rooster is offline  
Old 01-30-2017, 04:26 PM
  #543  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Toledo Oh
Posts: 10,061
Received 693 Likes on 277 Posts
Default

Collectively, we are all nothing but a bunch if viscous power hungry b!tches.........
phragle is offline  
Old 01-30-2017, 04:46 PM
  #544  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,886
Received 144 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by phragle
Collectively, we are all nothing but a bunch if viscous power hungry b!tches.........
The only thing that keeps us in check at all are our crappy drives, right? Lol
Baja Rooster is offline  
Old 01-30-2017, 04:51 PM
  #545  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,305
Received 1,494 Likes on 808 Posts
Default

It's just all about what you want in then end. There's pros and cons with both. No need to cover the obvious all over again. Like I said I've had and built both and will do again. I could careless what any individual does in regards to their build as long as it's what they want and their happy on the water. SC, NA... whatever.
getrdunn is offline  
Old 01-30-2017, 04:52 PM
  #546  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,305
Received 1,494 Likes on 808 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Baja Rooster
The only thing that keeps us in check at all are our crappy drives, right? Lol
you got that right.
getrdunn is offline  
Old 01-30-2017, 05:03 PM
  #547  
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
 
Full Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh
Posts: 11,636
Likes: 0
Received 208 Likes on 133 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by getrdunn
I just wanna know how much slower you go? Lol.
Exactly why I am done, everyone wants to see a failure happen.
Full Force is offline  
Old 01-30-2017, 05:04 PM
  #548  
SB
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,652
Received 3,190 Likes on 1,443 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Full Force
Exactly why I am done, everyone wants to see a failure happen.
I'll take that bet for the 3rd time.

And no, none of us wanted to see any failure. Enough is enough.
SB is online now  
Old 01-30-2017, 05:16 PM
  #549  
Registered
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 61
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Full Force
Exactly why I am done, everyone wants to see a failure happen.
Again you prove it time and time again, Yo skin is thin as f***!!!!!

I bet when you post your results, with more mph everybody gives you "congrats." well deserved.
chancer540 is offline  
Old 01-30-2017, 05:27 PM
  #550  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
14 apache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Northport N.Y.
Posts: 2,139
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by adk61
One thing I can tell you is.. 900HP supercharged VS 900HP NA the NA version will bankrupt you in fuel costs!! as a blower motor is far more efficient in cruise mode than any NA engine could dream of being...
That is not true.
14 apache is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.