Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Cam and valvetrain longevity....??? low duration high lift... >

Cam and valvetrain longevity....??? low duration high lift...

Notices

Cam and valvetrain longevity....??? low duration high lift...

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-07-2016, 04:55 PM
  #1361  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: taxachusetts
Posts: 3,150
Received 730 Likes on 376 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
Nice to see someone finally put some cam in an engine. These. 240* 540s are a dime a dozen .

That is a big port, prob wouldnt go that route for an NA 540 marine build, the 320 darts would prob work better. But with that roots up top, low end shouldn't be an issue. Im sure yours made plenty of torque.
hey,,I put 320's and 335 cnc'd heads on all the time w/ cams in the 254-262° range w/ 10+-1 comp.
sutphen 30 is offline  
Old 10-07-2016, 05:21 PM
  #1362  
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
 
Full Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh
Posts: 11,635
Likes: 0
Received 204 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

Trend .135 wall
Originally Posted by Boatally Insane
Just curious.. What pushrods are you running ?

Last edited by Full Force; 10-07-2016 at 08:47 PM.
Full Force is offline  
Old 10-07-2016, 05:44 PM
  #1363  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: taxachusetts
Posts: 3,150
Received 730 Likes on 376 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Full Force
Trend .135 wall
fixed it for you,,your measurement would never fit in the engine.
those push rods aren't flexing.
sutphen 30 is offline  
Old 10-07-2016, 06:19 PM
  #1364  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bck
This was the peakiest pull with the 2 in spacer. I went with the 1 inch spacer because it was broader than this one and higher in torque. I don't have that graph in the phone to upload here
That looks like a happy engine and must pull really hard with the one inch spacer. Pretty hard to find anything bad with your combo and you certainly did a lot of testing with intakes and carbs to get solid information.
ARB38 is offline  
Old 10-07-2016, 06:39 PM
  #1365  
bck
Charter Member#568
Charter Member
 
bck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Western N.Y.
Posts: 2,171
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ARB38
That looks like a happy engine and must pull really hard with the one inch spacer. Pretty hard to find anything bad with your combo and you certainly did a lot of testing with intakes and carbs to get solid information.
Not a huge difference but it averaged 4 more ft/lbs and 10 more hp with the 1 in. Peak tq was up 7 ft/lbs. The 2 in. only outperformed the 1 in. the last couple hundred rpm. The 1 in. also brought the peak hp rpm down a little and peak tq rpm up a little.
__________________
Straight bottoms and flat decks

Last edited by bck; 10-07-2016 at 06:42 PM.
bck is offline  
Old 10-07-2016, 07:20 PM
  #1366  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,886
Received 144 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bck
This was the peakiest pull with the 2 in spacer. I went with the 1 inch spacer because it was broader than this one and higher in torque. I don't have that graph in the phone to upload here
That's a gorgeous chart.
Baja Rooster is offline  
Old 10-07-2016, 08:17 PM
  #1367  
bck
Charter Member#568
Charter Member
 
bck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Western N.Y.
Posts: 2,171
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Baja Rooster
That's a gorgeous chart.
I just put a couple more charts up with the different combos on the thread I started about the intakes so as not to sidetrack this one.

http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...take-info.html
__________________
Straight bottoms and flat decks

Last edited by bck; 10-07-2016 at 08:20 PM.
bck is offline  
Old 10-07-2016, 08:46 PM
  #1368  
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
 
Full Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh
Posts: 11,635
Likes: 0
Received 204 Likes on 132 Posts
Default

oops lol no I bought good parts for that reason.

Originally Posted by sutphen 30
fixed it for you,,your measurement would never fit in the engine.
those push rods aren't flexing.
Full Force is offline  
Old 10-07-2016, 10:11 PM
  #1369  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bck
This was the peakiest pull with the 2 in spacer. I went with the 1 inch spacer because it was broader than this one and higher in torque. I don't have that graph in the phone to upload here
Did you try tuning out that dip in torque at 3400?

I remember seeing a video you had posted of one of your dyno pulls. Im no dyno expert, but that was like the fastest dyno pull i had ever seen. What was the sweep rate ? If i recall , seemed like it rev'd from 3000 to 6000 in like a few seconds.

On mine , it was the opposite. 3000-6500rpm took a long time. Wanna say it was like 150rpm per second sweep. I found it quite nerve racking loading the engine that long and hard. My engines would never accelerate that slow in the boat.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 10-07-2016, 10:36 PM
  #1370  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,305
Received 1,494 Likes on 808 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bck
I just put a couple more charts up with the different combos on the thread I started about the intakes so as not to sidetrack this one.

http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/g...take-info.html
What is your lsa? I forgot.
getrdunn is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.