Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Cam and valvetrain longevity....??? low duration high lift... >

Cam and valvetrain longevity....??? low duration high lift...

Notices

Cam and valvetrain longevity....??? low duration high lift...

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-08-2016, 10:45 PM
  #1381  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Short changing an engine on duration, is just as bad, if not worse, than short changing it on lift. Somehow, we have all been trained that duration is bad, lift it good.

I'd be willing to bet, Full Force tim's engine, with the proper duration, and say 630ish lift, will kick the 680 lift , short duration cam's azz.

I have heard guys say, "no need to go over 650 lift if the heads don't flow any more air at 700 lift than they do at 650". IF you stick a cam in a combo like that, it will still make more power with the 700 lift cam. Why? Because a 650 lift cam, is only at 650 lift for a small amount of time. A 700 lift cam, will have more time, from the point at which the valve is coming up to 650 lift, going past 650 lift to 700, and again going past 650 lift on its way down.

also, as I have said before, just because a cam makes it PEAK HP at 5900rpm, doesn't mean that if you go to a cam that makes PEAK hp at 6300RPM, you will have LESS power at 5900RPM, as the first combo. The cam gods make you think that if you ask for a cam for a combo that you are gonna prop to 6000rpm, and it peaks at 6000 on the dyno, then you just struck gold !
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 10-08-2016, 11:08 PM
  #1382  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Baja Rooster
I see that MK was spec'ing high lift short duration for pretty much everything. So what is the theororetical value of such relative short duration? I'm flipping through a comp cams catalog and all of their cams for marine use ~.550 lift but about +20* on the duration. These seem flat and wide compared to the MK cams.
Comp also offerers their marine cams, in a high lift version. You wont get a .400 lobe, with 241 duration though, not from them or crane, lunati, etc.

If there was no downside to short duration, high lift, we would see 224* degree cams with .400 lobes.

When paging thru some of the big cam companies lobe series, even for solid rollers, anything labeled "endurance" or "marine" , will generally have less lobe lift, than a drag race profile, duration being equal.
MILD THUNDER is offline  
Old 10-09-2016, 05:16 PM
  #1383  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,305
Received 1,494 Likes on 808 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
Short changing an engine on duration, is just as bad, if not worse, than short changing it on lift. Somehow, we have all been trained that duration is bad, lift it good.

I'd be willing to bet, Full Force tim's engine, with the proper duration, and say 630ish lift, will kick the 680 lift , short duration cam's azz.

I have heard guys say, "no need to go over 650 lift if the heads don't flow any more air at 700 lift than they do at 650". IF you stick a cam in a combo like that, it will still make more power with the 700 lift cam. Why? Because a 650 lift cam, is only at 650 lift for a small amount of time. A 700 lift cam, will have more time, from the point at which the valve is coming up to 650 lift, going past 650 lift to 700, and again going past 650 lift on its way down.

also, as I have said before, just because a cam makes it PEAK HP at 5900rpm, doesn't mean that if you go to a cam that makes PEAK hp at 6300RPM, you will have LESS power at 5900RPM, as the first combo. The cam gods make you think that if you ask for a cam for a combo that you are gonna prop to 6000rpm, and it peaks at 6000 on the dyno, then you just struck gold !
MT you got me thinking about this in regards to optimizing build with heads that flow well way through .700 then say flatten out btwn .700 and .800. In comparison to what you mentioned above would you apply the same principle. Select a cam .725-.750. I would imagine at some point you need to cap lift as duration will increase as well but just don't want to get to high above running rpm with max hp say for instance like peak hp numbers up near 7k when your propping to 6k. Don't get me wrong I understand the continuing to make power above running rpm. Most my builds exceeded power above where Ive propped.

Otherwise any thoughts on pushing the limits on duration within reason to get most out of build possible and advance cam to bring power peak power down to a more desirable rpm. With many grinds already having advance ground into them 4 plus or minus... Where do you draw the line on how far to advance cam if where to do so. I've never been more than 8 deg total. Just looking for insight on such. Any thoughts?
getrdunn is offline  
Old 10-09-2016, 05:23 PM
  #1384  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,305
Received 1,494 Likes on 808 Posts
Default

In addition to above post what if heads flow well up to up to .800 with worthy gains btwn .700-.800.

Now that I think of it black baja touched on this somewhere along the line here in this thread or another. At what point is to much when it comes to advancing a cam due to piston location vs valve timing events?

Last edited by getrdunn; 10-09-2016 at 05:45 PM.
getrdunn is offline  
Old 10-09-2016, 10:11 PM
  #1385  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
articfriends's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: frankenmuth michigan
Posts: 7,201
Received 882 Likes on 410 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by getrdunn
MT you got me thinking about this in regards to optimizing build with heads that flow well way through .700 then say flatten out btwn .700 and .800. In comparison to what you mentioned above would you apply the same principle. Select a cam .725-.750. I would imagine at some point you need to cap lift as duration will increase as well but just don't want to get to high above running rpm with max hp say for instance like peak hp numbers up near 7k when your propping to 6k. Don't get me wrong I understand the continuing to make power above running rpm. Most my builds exceeded power above where Ive propped.

Otherwise any thoughts on pushing the limits on duration within reason to get most out of build possible and advance cam to bring power peak power down to a more desirable rpm. With many grinds already having advance ground into them 4 plus or minus... Where do you draw the line on how far to advance cam if where to do so. I've never been more than 8 deg total. Just looking for insight on such. Any thoughts?
Im getting ready to assemble my old bajas 540 long block na w a 252/259 cam .660 lift, doesnt have really enough compression to support the cam but going to run it anyways on my dyno just to see how much hp it willake, afr 315s that been re cncd to flow 400+cfm, previously made around 650 hp na w a modded 502 mpi intake on this very set up, i plan on playing w cam timing on the dyno, intake swaps, mods, etc
articfriends is offline  
Old 10-09-2016, 10:19 PM
  #1386  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
articfriends's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: frankenmuth michigan
Posts: 7,201
Received 882 Likes on 410 Posts
Default

Starting out w a modified procomp/speedmaster open plenum intake w 2200 cfm dominator style throttle body
Attached Thumbnails Cam and valvetrain longevity....??? low duration high lift...-20160913_130255.jpg  
articfriends is offline  
Old 10-09-2016, 10:24 PM
  #1387  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 2,195
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by articfriends
Im getting ready to assemble my old bajas 540 long block na w a 252/259 cam .660 lift, doesnt have really enough compression to support the cam but going to run it anyways on my dyno just to see how much hp it willake, afr 315s that been re cncd to flow 400+cfm, previously made around 650 hp na w a modded 502 mpi intake on this very set up, i plan on playing w cam timing on the dyno, intake swaps, mods, etc
Will you have the necessary valve size and lift to take advantage of the 400+CFM?
BenPerfected is offline  
Old 10-09-2016, 10:24 PM
  #1388  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,305
Received 1,494 Likes on 808 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by articfriends
Im getting ready to assemble my old bajas 540 long block na w a 252/259 cam .660 lift, doesnt have really enough compression to support the cam but going to run it anyways on my dyno just to see how much hp it willake, afr 315s that been re cncd to flow 400+cfm, previously made around 650 hp na w a modded 502 mpi intake on this very set up, i plan on playing w cam timing on the dyno, intake swaps, mods, etc

If I go hyd I may try this and see how it works out. 253/259-680/680 on a 112
Attached Thumbnails Cam and valvetrain longevity....??? low duration high lift...-image.jpg  
getrdunn is offline  
Old 10-09-2016, 10:32 PM
  #1389  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: taxachusetts
Posts: 3,188
Received 790 Likes on 401 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by getrdunn
If I go hyd I may try this and see how it works out. 253/259-680/680 on a 112
that cam looks interesting,,in good way.go for it.
sutphen 30 is offline  
Old 10-09-2016, 10:50 PM
  #1390  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 11,332
Received 71 Likes on 39 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by getrdunn
If I go hyd I may try this and see how it works out. 253/259-680/680 on a 112
I would call howard, and get the cam on a billet core. Im pretty sure that for that price, its on a sadi core
MILD THUNDER is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.