Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Cam and valvetrain longevity....??? low duration high lift... >

Cam and valvetrain longevity....??? low duration high lift...

Notices

Cam and valvetrain longevity....??? low duration high lift...

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-01-2016, 08:42 PM
  #911  
Gold Member
Gold Member
Thread Starter
 
Full Force's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Olmsted Falls,Ohio Marblehead,Oh
Posts: 11,636
Likes: 0
Received 209 Likes on 133 Posts
Default

I hear ya on the carb thing, learning more since 2014 also.. I am much smarter now and educated and continue to learn, you know I will do what I can to
Maximize this time, without re inventing wheel ...I trust my buddy's ability to come up with cam specs per cylinder head flow and will address all that when that time comes...hoping to Dyno in Jan or so... With you and Ryan, if that happens I am gonna schedule a 3-4 day trip to really play with things more, last time was a "let's see what you have session" as you know lets see how it goes this time!!!
Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
You might go from 73.2, to 73.3!

I pretty much suggested a dominator from the get go on this build. That thread was a whole nother chit show of arguing. You said no way, because you couldn't fit it. Now, you're willing to find room, to fit a spacer under your current carb, and worried your carb is too small?! lol

I think this time around, you might be best to do your own engine development. What I mean is, taking advice from 30 different avenues, is not necessarily a bad thing, but at the end of the day, strapping the thing on a dyno, and trying out various carbs, various intakes, swapping exhaust, etc. Sometimes, what looks great on paper, doesn't always work.

You know Ryan Retter is flexible with you, and will work with you to try different things on the dyno, and won't nickel and dime you for the time. Theres no point in cutting up your hatch, if its a 10hp gain. Now, if you find a particular intake/carb combo, that nets you 25, 35, 40+hp , you may want to modify the hatch. Same thing with exhaust. You might find 10hp from switching from your manifolds to a header setup, or you might find 50hp. That might sway you to looking into different exhaust, or keeping what you have. But, you gotta do the testing. What works on one guys engine, might not work on yours. BCK spent some time on fine tuning his intake/carb combo. He found what , like 25hp doing so? Thats not a bad gain at all.

We have enough of us here, that I am sure someone would be willing to loan out an intake, a carb, maybe even some spacers, etc, to try .
Full Force is offline  
Old 10-01-2016, 08:45 PM
  #912  
SB
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,678
Received 3,217 Likes on 1,455 Posts
Default

p92 !
SB is offline  
Old 10-01-2016, 09:17 PM
  #913  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,305
Received 1,494 Likes on 808 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Black Baja
That cam is too small. Need mid 250's on intake high 250's exhaust 109 lsa cam needs to go in 10 degrees advanced. Something along those line in mid 5xx" motors with 320range heads will be in the 725-750hp range a tic over 6,000 rpm's with compression in 9.5:1 range. They really make a bunch more torque if you put a dome piston in them around 10.3:1

This type of cam will revert h2o
So assuming cam has no advance ground into based on the duration numbers you mentioned to install at 10 deg advanced. I see where larger CI engines absorbs duration say for instance from a 454 to a 540 or larger. So with that said would it also be correct to say comparing to 572 builds with different stroke combos the longer stroke build would have lower peak hp rpm than that of the shorter stroke. But back to your original comment I'd guess with the duration you mentioned based on a 540 you'd be looking at approximately 7k peak rpm + or -? If advancing 1 deg = 100 rpm to bring it in around 6k.

Interesting stuff.
getrdunn is offline  
Old 10-01-2016, 09:32 PM
  #914  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 2,886
Received 144 Likes on 96 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SB
p92 !
Just a day or two ago I was aiming for 70 yet we all hung out in 69 forever.

Last edited by Baja Rooster; 10-02-2016 at 10:55 AM.
Baja Rooster is offline  
Old 10-01-2016, 10:26 PM
  #915  
Registered
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 1,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by getrdunn
So assuming cam has no advance ground into based on the duration numbers you mentioned to install at 10 deg advanced. I see where larger CI engines absorbs duration say for instance from a 454 to a 540 or larger. So with that said would it also be correct to say comparing to 572 builds with different stroke combos the longer stroke build would have lower peak hp rpm than that of the shorter stroke. But back to your original comment I'd guess with the duration you mentioned based on a 540 you'd be looking at approximately 7k peak rpm + or -? If advancing 1 deg = 100 rpm to bring it in around 6k.

Interesting stuff.
Personally I feel if you need to advance a cam 10 degrees to get optimal performance then it's too big for the application. Why not just pick the right events when you order the cam, or find something closer off the shelf?
HaxbySpeed is offline  
Old 10-01-2016, 10:27 PM
  #916  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NW Michigan
Posts: 8,305
Received 1,494 Likes on 808 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Full Force
Pulled mesh out last year haha only have 2 layers you see right through
Very noticeable in your pics you posted of clearance concerns. Lol. Caught it right away.
getrdunn is offline  
Old 10-01-2016, 10:31 PM
  #917  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: bel air, md
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by getrdunn
So assuming cam has no advance ground into based on the duration numbers you mentioned to install at 10 deg advanced. I see where larger CI engines absorbs duration say for instance from a 454 to a 540 or larger. So with that said would it also be correct to say comparing to 572 builds with different stroke combos the longer stroke build would have lower peak hp rpm than that of the shorter stroke. But back to your original comment I'd guess with the duration you mentioned based on a 540 you'd be looking at approximately 7k peak rpm + or -? If advancing 1 deg = 100 rpm to bring it in around 6k.

Interesting stuff.
A 540-565 with that a cam like that will Peter out right about 62-6300 rpm. Unless you have a restriction. We've ran this combination with 4150 carbs and they still make the numbers. With the ICL around 105 the motor will have a torque curve like a 4x4 from 3,000 rpm up and make a tick under 700ft lbs of torque. With the larger cubic inch stuff you can add some duration back the ICL up and split the lobes more because they naturally make more cylinder pressure. It's really hard to get RPM out of the Big Cubic inch stuff cause you really start running out of cylinder head intake and Carb. With a 632 and a conventional head you end up with a cam with high 280's 305 115-116 lsa and you'll be lucky if it will spin to 7,000 rpm. Buying heads 100% bare no seats no valve guides just a raw head helps. Cause then you can roll the valve angle a few degrees move the combustion chamber and angle mill the piss out of it. Work on getting the intake valve away from the cylinder wall by drilling the head bolt holes where they should be. These are the types of things involved with large motors and trying to make the big numbers. It's a lot more to it than buying a pair of CNC head and bolting them on the motor.
Black Baja is offline  
Old 10-01-2016, 10:57 PM
  #918  
Geronimo36
Gold Member
 
Panther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Elkton, MD
Posts: 11,972
Received 131 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Black Baja, what ever happened to the Grumpy heads I sold you a few years ago?

How come we haven't seen each other on the water yet? Or maybe we have and I didn't out 2&2 together? Where do you usually run too?
Panther is offline  
Old 10-01-2016, 11:17 PM
  #919  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: bel air, md
Posts: 2,733
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Panther
Black Baja, what ever happened to the Grumpy heads I sold you a few years ago?

How come we haven't seen each other on the water yet? Or maybe we have and I didn't out 2&2 together? Where do you usually run too?
We keept our Fountain in Middle river on a lift. We were out every weekend. Pretty much rafted up at Still Pond every Saturday and Sunday. Gave the heads to a friend of mine who never used them. I have two more sets of those same heads if you know anyone that needs heads.
Black Baja is offline  
Old 10-02-2016, 12:47 AM
  #920  
Registered
 
Rookie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 5,795
Received 1,280 Likes on 621 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
Wonder if that would put any stress on the lifter tie bars? know a few guys who broke some lifter tie bars with bobs cams. Never really thought about that. [/I]
Originally Posted by dunnitagain
Oh hell yes it will break tie bars.
What about breaking pushrod guides? I've snapped 3 since...
Rookie is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.