Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Mercruiser 454/420 exhaust risers >

Mercruiser 454/420 exhaust risers

Notices

Mercruiser 454/420 exhaust risers

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-25-2017, 08:50 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Traverse City, Michigan
Posts: 5,020
Received 747 Likes on 338 Posts
Default Mercruiser 454/420 exhaust risers

Anyone have any knowledge regarding which height exhaust riser works on the mercruiser 454/420's using EMI exhaust manifolds ? They have a standard and 3" higher riser. The standard states not to be used on engines with aftermarket camshafts. These engines have the mercruiser supplied camshafts.
My question centers around reversion and also hatch clearance.
thanks, ed

Last edited by Interceptor; 10-27-2017 at 10:29 AM.
Interceptor is offline  
Old 10-26-2017, 12:59 AM
  #2  
Charter Member # 55
Charter Member
 
Griff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Omaha/LOTO
Posts: 19,737
Received 1,967 Likes on 988 Posts
Default

The 454/420's were mated to TRS drives. Is that what you have??

Reversion is more about the downward angle and length of riser. TRS risers are longer and water mixes farther down.

I ran standard long IMCO risers with a cam slightly more aggressive than the 420 cam and didn't have any issues
Griff is offline  
Old 10-26-2017, 07:13 AM
  #3  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: KY
Posts: 4,159
Received 485 Likes on 377 Posts
Default

Standard install measurements
Attached Thumbnails Mercruiser 454/420 exhaust risers-ext-level.jpg  
AllDodge is offline  
Old 10-26-2017, 08:52 AM
  #4  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Traverse City, Michigan
Posts: 5,020
Received 747 Likes on 338 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Griff
The 454/420's were mated to TRS drives. Is that what you have??

Reversion is more about the downward angle and length of riser. TRS risers are longer and water mixes farther down.

I ran standard long IMCO risers with a cam slightly more aggressive than the 420 cam and didn't have any issues

This is in a Bravo application with silent choice.

Last edited by Interceptor; 10-26-2017 at 08:55 AM.
Interceptor is offline  
Old 10-26-2017, 08:57 AM
  #5  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: KY
Posts: 4,159
Received 485 Likes on 377 Posts
Default

My 502 (415hp) was using EMI's with silent choice and I didn't quite have 13 inches up from the water with no issues. After rebuild I removed the standard risers and installed the 3 inch higher because of more hp. Still have the regular ones

EMI Thunder Exhaust System-BB Chevy With SS Silent Choice Risers Colored Finish
AllDodge is offline  
Old 10-26-2017, 04:08 PM
  #6  
Charter Member # 55
Charter Member
 
Griff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Omaha/LOTO
Posts: 19,737
Received 1,967 Likes on 988 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Interceptor
This is in a Bravo application with silent choice.
The shorter risers with silent choice could cause reversion. There is now way to tell for sure prior to the install.
That is why EMI recommends the 3" taller ones.
Griff is offline  
Old 10-26-2017, 05:03 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: westville, NJ
Posts: 4,031
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AllDodge
My 502 (415hp) was using EMI's with silent choice and I didn't quite have 13 inches up from the water with no issues. After rebuild I removed the standard risers and installed the 3 inch higher because of more hp. Still have the regular ones

EMI Thunder Exhaust System-BB Chevy With SS Silent Choice Risers Colored Finish
This is about the only engine that needs exhaust upgrade in bone stock form. That stock merc exhaust can handle 454 mags, but that is approaching their airflow limit. Dunno why they didn't use the Gil design they put on everything else bigger than 454. The old 420 merc exhaust flowed good, but leaked water bad at the riser joint.
dereknkathy is offline  
Old 10-30-2017, 09:03 AM
  #8  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Traverse City, Michigan
Posts: 5,020
Received 747 Likes on 338 Posts
Default

So I'm still trying to understand. Has anyone run a 454/420 or engine with a similar cam (assuming the cam is the issue) using a GIL, EMI type manifold and standard riser and silent choice system and Bravo outdrive ? and did you have reversion ?
ed
Interceptor is offline  
Old 10-30-2017, 04:48 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: westville, NJ
Posts: 4,031
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

that 420 cam is pretty much extinct. flat tappet. a lot of duration. found old thread, so old dennis moore weighed in on it. but you should upgrade those cams instead of trying to build around them.
dereknkathy is offline  
Old 10-31-2017, 01:19 AM
  #10  
Charter Member # 55
Charter Member
 
Griff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Omaha/LOTO
Posts: 19,737
Received 1,967 Likes on 988 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Interceptor
So I'm still trying to understand. Has anyone run a 454/420 or engine with a similar cam (assuming the cam is the issue) using a GIL, EMI type manifold and standard riser and silent choice system and Bravo outdrive ? and did you have reversion ?
ed
The same cam was used in the 525SC which came with Gil's and then later CMI's.
None of the parts diagrams show a short riser/tail available with the 525SC.

Personally, I wouldn't chance it and I'd run longer risers with good mufflers.
Griff is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.