Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
454 MPI advance timing issue >

454 MPI advance timing issue

Notices

454 MPI advance timing issue

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-25-2020, 02:35 PM
  #21  
SB
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: On A Dirt Floor
Posts: 13,746
Received 3,331 Likes on 1,493 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SB
How do we know if the advance you saw isn’t correct for the throttle position/intake vacuum/coolant temp/ and rpm ?

Anyone know the tables ? Articfriends/sutphen30/others here that have programmed the ecu’s for these motors want to speak up ?
Okay, I did some digging. Found one of many of ArcticFriend's posts. Here is table on a 502MPIMAG 415hpshould be quite similar to 454MAG MPI 385HP)
Note: do more diffing under his name and you'll surely find more :

GEN VI 502 MPI Timing
SB is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by SB:
articfriends (08-27-2020), jevonlau (08-25-2020)
Old 08-25-2020, 02:50 PM
  #22  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
F-2 Speedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Midwest & T-Rock
Posts: 10,718
Received 3,271 Likes on 1,465 Posts
Default

Now that you're on TDC also run the firing order on the plug wires from the cap to the plug may have 2 flipped.....
F-2 Speedy is offline  
The following users liked this post:
jevonlau (08-25-2020)
Old 08-25-2020, 03:33 PM
  #23  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 35
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by MILD THUNDER
The timing youre seeing with the gun, is the actual timing thats taking place. 15* sounds low, but i dont have the table handy to compare what it should be, vs what it really is.

What version of mefi is it ? Also, is this the 310hp or the 385hp version engine?
it’s a 1999 7.4 mpi 310hp version. The serial number has faded off of the plastic shroud on the top so i don’t have that unless it’s stamped on the block somewhere
jevonlau is offline  
Old 08-25-2020, 03:37 PM
  #24  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 35
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by F-2 Speedy
Now that you're on TDC also run the firing order on the plug wires from the cap to the plug may have 2 flipped.....
i triple checked this when i put the new cap, rotor, plugs and wires but I’ll check again tonight!!!!
jevonlau is offline  
Old 08-25-2020, 07:30 PM
  #25  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: KY
Posts: 4,159
Received 485 Likes on 377 Posts
Default

Being 310HP you have the L29 which has 2 knock sensors
Have you tried to remove or disconnected the sensors or knock module to see if timing increases?
AllDodge is offline  
Old 08-25-2020, 07:32 PM
  #26  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 35
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by AllDodge
Being 310HP you have the L29 which has 2 knock sensors
Have you tried to remove or disconnected the sensors or knock module to see if timing increases?
I haven't but I will try that this weekend and check timing again. If it's the same, what else could be causing it not to advance?
jevonlau is offline  
Old 08-25-2020, 07:45 PM
  #27  
Registered
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: KY
Posts: 4,159
Received 485 Likes on 377 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jevonlau
If it's the same, what else could be causing it not to advance?
That's what doesn't make sense. The L29 should have a MEFI 2 ECM. If the knock module is what is keeping it from advancing then there should be a code 43. Have not read where codes are found. Now if the ECM test on first throttle up the knock module to see if it can make it knock. If this doesn't happen (mine did that after repower) then there would be a code 44. So no codes but no advance. As said previous, the EST module and ECM is what controls the advance.

If there was a code 42 then it would be the module is not coming out of bypass

Again no codes so it doesn't make sense, so I'm spit balling
AllDodge is offline  
Old 08-26-2020, 02:43 PM
  #28  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 35
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by AllDodge
That's what doesn't make sense. The L29 should have a MEFI 2 ECM. If the knock module is what is keeping it from advancing then there should be a code 43. Have not read where codes are found. Now if the ECM test on first throttle up the knock module to see if it can make it knock. If this doesn't happen (mine did that after repower) then there would be a code 44. So no codes but no advance. As said previous, the EST module and ECM is what controls the advance.

If there was a code 42 then it would be the module is not coming out of bypass

Again no codes so it doesn't make sense, so I'm spit balling
I scanned it and it pulled a code 44... no knock detected. What is the procedure to diagnose this code? thanks, I think we're getting closer!
jevonlau is offline  
Old 08-26-2020, 02:46 PM
  #29  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Posts: 35
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

also, I've been running premium ( i think its 93) octane fuel. From what I've read, these older engines were designed to run on 89 and that the higher octane fuel could cause code 44? Not sure what I take of that....?? Thoughts? I figured higher octane would be better
jevonlau is offline  
Old 08-26-2020, 03:20 PM
  #30  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,177
Received 115 Likes on 86 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jevonlau
also, I've been running premium ( i think its 93) octane fuel. From what I've read, these older engines were designed to run on 89 and that the higher octane fuel could cause code 44? Not sure what I take of that....?? Thoughts? I figured higher octane would be better
No you do not have that problem. The specific issue you are referring to was for a small batch of 454/502 Mag EFI/MP motors around 1994-1995. There was a Merc service bulletin put out at the time addressing the issue. Basically during engine start the ECM would advance timing until knock was detected which verified the knock sensor was working. If it didn't detect knock it would trigger a code and retard timing. This does not apply to your engine.
Trash is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by Trash:
articfriends (08-27-2020), jevonlau (08-26-2020)


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.