LS Engines Maybe the future of I/O's
#151
Registered
Note sure if any of that would be worthwhile compared to a big block. But maybe a stock one with exhaust manifolds would be a decent, cheap option for 450-500hp.
#152
Registered
LakeBoat,
The cell phone serves the exact same function as a landline, plus a bazzilion others, with fewer restrictions than benefits over landlines. Personally, I still pay many of my (business) bills with checks, keep cash in my wallet and have a retirement account. Change for improvement's sake is awesome. Change for change's sake is pointless and often detrimental. That said, I think what you're striving for is really cool (beautiful engines, BTW), and hope to see it work out. So far, what I've seen out of LSs vs BBCs is the LS is running with its tongue hanging out while the BBC is just hitting its stride. On the road, with the presence of gears, the LS is a no-brainer. Higher RPMS to get to speed, higher gearing to reduce RPM and maintain speed under minimal load. On the water, we are never not under load (not to suggest you don't already know this). In a marine application, keeping it on the firewall for extended periods seems to be the Achille's heel, given the myriad of efforts made, pretty much specific to marine applications, to keep them from scattering or melting down while doing so. So, I'll ask again... What all makes an LS an LS? What is keeping somebody with the wherewithal from building a 565ci LS? Why not meld the benefits of the LS platform, whatever they may be, with the proven "No replacement for displacement" idiom of the BBC? Is there something in the physical architecture prohibiting this? I genuinely don't know. I've asked, and nobody has given me a real answer; here or elsewhere.
Thanks. Brad.
The cell phone serves the exact same function as a landline, plus a bazzilion others, with fewer restrictions than benefits over landlines. Personally, I still pay many of my (business) bills with checks, keep cash in my wallet and have a retirement account. Change for improvement's sake is awesome. Change for change's sake is pointless and often detrimental. That said, I think what you're striving for is really cool (beautiful engines, BTW), and hope to see it work out. So far, what I've seen out of LSs vs BBCs is the LS is running with its tongue hanging out while the BBC is just hitting its stride. On the road, with the presence of gears, the LS is a no-brainer. Higher RPMS to get to speed, higher gearing to reduce RPM and maintain speed under minimal load. On the water, we are never not under load (not to suggest you don't already know this). In a marine application, keeping it on the firewall for extended periods seems to be the Achille's heel, given the myriad of efforts made, pretty much specific to marine applications, to keep them from scattering or melting down while doing so. So, I'll ask again... What all makes an LS an LS? What is keeping somebody with the wherewithal from building a 565ci LS? Why not meld the benefits of the LS platform, whatever they may be, with the proven "No replacement for displacement" idiom of the BBC? Is there something in the physical architecture prohibiting this? I genuinely don't know. I've asked, and nobody has given me a real answer; here or elsewhere.
Thanks. Brad.
Last edited by hogie roll; 02-22-2024 at 03:56 PM.
#153
Registered
Well you wouldn’t want LS equivalent part sizes. A big block is almost exactly 10% larger in bore space and deck height. So 1.1^3 gives you a 33% larger engine. You’d end up with something like a 70mm cam core (possible but not common), and a 1.1” lifter dia (.904 and .936 are common).
Then you’d want an enormous spread port 12-15* head. These are also available, just expensive, and they need special shaft rocker systems.
GMs 632/1000 motor is very close to being a scaled up LS. They’ll make 1100hp on a dyno. They may be a bit aggressive on the cam lift and compression for a boat, but I’d bet there’s also a little left on the table with a nicer 2x4 intake manifold.
If you were starting from scratch you could do a 600-632 (some people think 632 is too much rod angle and not enough piston skirt for a boat) and use the brodix or dart SR20 20* heads. A 55mm cam and .904” lifters, this is a fairly common drag racing bracket combo now.
The following users liked this post:
ICDEDPPL (02-23-2024)
#154
Guys it is more like vanilla or chocolate, here both engine are from Chevy. Both are good but different guys like different tastes. I think the big thing is the firing order both are different. That said the 565's I have do have an LS firing order. As for heads there has been many types on a BBC. More than any other block over the years. If there was a clear advantage for a head it would outshine the rest by now. If I could build a big Hemi for a boat I would. Been running them for years in old Dodges and Plymouths. From 426-605cu/in. Cast iron to all Aluminum. Fact is my Plymouth is named "Rat Killer"
My point is that I can get "more out of less" with a LS. It is still a 427cu/in that the BBC was made by the 10,000's. Car, Truck, Industrial, Marine, etc. It does come at a cost but it can be done to make big HP and Torque. Reliably< I guess I will see real soon. I don't think it will be any worse than a 1000hp BBC have rebuilds at 100 hours. Not trying to engineer a new engine out of 20 year old LS Tech, 60 years for a BBC, but to stimulate Great conversation here.
To build anything these days is not just the money it is parts availability, I waited on a Callies crank for a Year for the LS. Been waiting on BBC pistons for 3 months now, they came in wrong once already. To say that a junkyard engine is what most start with is just wrong and a waste of time to think it could work.
On the OB engines, how long do you think they will go being all aluminum and salt water cooled before corrosion takes it toll? At $50-70K for a Mercury R, are they really worth the $$$ Are they throw away power units?
My point is that I can get "more out of less" with a LS. It is still a 427cu/in that the BBC was made by the 10,000's. Car, Truck, Industrial, Marine, etc. It does come at a cost but it can be done to make big HP and Torque. Reliably< I guess I will see real soon. I don't think it will be any worse than a 1000hp BBC have rebuilds at 100 hours. Not trying to engineer a new engine out of 20 year old LS Tech, 60 years for a BBC, but to stimulate Great conversation here.
To build anything these days is not just the money it is parts availability, I waited on a Callies crank for a Year for the LS. Been waiting on BBC pistons for 3 months now, they came in wrong once already. To say that a junkyard engine is what most start with is just wrong and a waste of time to think it could work.
On the OB engines, how long do you think they will go being all aluminum and salt water cooled before corrosion takes it toll? At $50-70K for a Mercury R, are they really worth the $$$ Are they throw away power units?
#155
Registered
The new breed of men are far less knowledgeable on wrenching their own boats. Even foroil changes and the like. So outboards start winning the day now that they've got big hp. They totally ruin a rear deck on a 50+ft open deck party boat. Where twin diesels with Arneson drives would be optimal.
Big HP outboards are out of reach for many, and they have their issues as well.
Maybe one of the key questions, why did Merc Racing use the BBC for the 520?
Big HP outboards are out of reach for many, and they have their issues as well.
Maybe one of the key questions, why did Merc Racing use the BBC for the 520?
The following users liked this post:
105Fountain (02-22-2024)
#156
Registered
The new breed of men are far less knowledgeable on wrenching their own boats. Even foroil changes and the like. So outboards start winning the day now that they've got big hp. They totally ruin a rear deck on a 50+ft open deck party boat. Where twin diesels with Arneson drives would be optimal.
Big HP outboards are out of reach for many, and they have their issues as well.
Maybe one of the key questions, why did Merc Racing use the BBC for the 520?
Big HP outboards are out of reach for many, and they have their issues as well.
Maybe one of the key questions, why did Merc Racing use the BBC for the 520?
As for why they used a BBC for the 520. I'm 95% sure that is still made on the same line at GM as the 502 Mags were.
The following 2 users liked this post by Precision:
Tartilla (02-22-2024), Twin O/B Sonic (02-22-2024)
#157
Registered
#158
VIP Member
VIP Member
The new breed of men are far less knowledgeable on wrenching their own boats. Even foroil changes and the like. So outboards start winning the day now that they've got big hp. They totally ruin a rear deck on a 50+ft open deck party boat. Where twin diesels with Arneson drives would be optimal.
Big HP outboards are out of reach for many, and they have their issues as well.
Maybe one of the key questions, why did Merc Racing use the BBC for the 520?
Big HP outboards are out of reach for many, and they have their issues as well.
Maybe one of the key questions, why did Merc Racing use the BBC for the 520?
Another issue is the 20 somethings of today are not getting into performance boating like we were. Partially because of the exponential cost of entry compared to the recent past I imagine. I remember 15 years ago buying my first "performance boat". It was a 1990 Checkmate Maxum 281 and we paid $16K for it on a Eagle trailer. I saw the same boat for sale last year for $30K, but I have no idea what it sold for. It seems that the younger crowd that are getting into boating come from a background of means and are able to jump over the 20-30 year old boats and go right for the OB cats and CC's. That's obviously a generalized statement, but it does seem to be a theme in recent years.
As for why they used a BBC for the 520. I'm 95% sure that is still made on the same line at GM as the 502 Mags were.
As for why they used a BBC for the 520. I'm 95% sure that is still made on the same line at GM as the 502 Mags were.
Personally, I applaud anybody willing to try something new. I just think displacement is still going to rule the end result, be it LS or BBC or whatever.
Thanks. Brad.
#159
Were doomed!
Charter Member
Wildman,
I'm still not getting my question out right, I guess....
What is to stop ME, money aside, from building a 565ci LS, starting with a Dart BigM block? I'm not talking about a business venture. I'm talking about starting with gathering up a benchtop full of parts and a readily available block big enough to house 565ci of displacement, and building an LS?
In short.... What makes an LS and LS?
Thanks. Brad.
I'm still not getting my question out right, I guess....
What is to stop ME, money aside, from building a 565ci LS, starting with a Dart BigM block? I'm not talking about a business venture. I'm talking about starting with gathering up a benchtop full of parts and a readily available block big enough to house 565ci of displacement, and building an LS?
In short.... What makes an LS and LS?
Thanks. Brad.
I think the main differences are the skirted block and 6-bolt mains that makes it stronger to handle more HP stock. ( the LS platform with stock cranks can easily handle 1000hp and has been shown all over the net)
the cranks are also better compared to the old SBC (again can handle 1000HP stock compared to around 500hp for the old sbc)
Larger Cam bearing diameters on the LS compared to the old sbc ( i think the LS has a 2.3" OD and the old sbc had around a 1.8" OD) so it makes it like a little over 20% bigger than the orriginal
Better head flow design on the LS
and revised firing order for reduced crankshaft vibrations and eased the load on the bearings
So could you make a quasi-LS BBC motor? sure you could...i dont know if anyone makes a skirted BBC block but i have seen some custom ones done out of some billet.
The rest is just parts that you put together.
__________________
-Wally
Money can't buy happiness, but it can buy horsepower. And I've never seen a sad person hauling a$$!
-Wally
Money can't buy happiness, but it can buy horsepower. And I've never seen a sad person hauling a$$!
#160
VIP Member
VIP Member
Brad, the "LS" is just the next generation of smallblock so you have to compare the new to the old versions....
I think the main differences are the skirted block and 6-bolt mains that makes it stronger to handle more HP stock. ( the LS platform with stock cranks can easily handle 1000hp and has been shown all over the net)
the cranks are also better compared to the old SBC (again can handle 1000HP stock compared to around 500hp for the old sbc)
Larger Cam bearing diameters on the LS compared to the old sbc ( i think the LS has a 2.3" OD and the old sbc had around a 1.8" OD) so it makes it like a little over 20% bigger than the orriginal
Better head flow design on the LS
and revised firing order for reduced crankshaft vibrations and eased the load on the bearings
So could you make a quasi-LS BBC motor? sure you could...i dont know if anyone makes a skirted BBC block but i have seen some custom ones done out of some billet.
The rest is just parts that you put together.
I think the main differences are the skirted block and 6-bolt mains that makes it stronger to handle more HP stock. ( the LS platform with stock cranks can easily handle 1000hp and has been shown all over the net)
the cranks are also better compared to the old SBC (again can handle 1000HP stock compared to around 500hp for the old sbc)
Larger Cam bearing diameters on the LS compared to the old sbc ( i think the LS has a 2.3" OD and the old sbc had around a 1.8" OD) so it makes it like a little over 20% bigger than the orriginal
Better head flow design on the LS
and revised firing order for reduced crankshaft vibrations and eased the load on the bearings
So could you make a quasi-LS BBC motor? sure you could...i dont know if anyone makes a skirted BBC block but i have seen some custom ones done out of some billet.
The rest is just parts that you put together.
Would the skirt be of any real benefit for the typical BB powerboater? Splayed caps, I would think, resolve most of that, and certainly for those seeking HP levels in the range where a SB LS might be applicable.
Otherwise, what I'm hearing is that the semi-raging debate between the LS guys and the BBC guys is kind of moot. There really is no inherent reason to choose. We CAN do both. Pretty much anybody building engines, with adequate budget, can satisfy both camps. Right?
If the interest is in SB displacement, I'd think you'd be in the same boat at 1000HP that those with 1550's are in: Rebuilding every season, or every other.
Thanks. Brad.