Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
Size difference btw 496 MAG and HO >

Size difference btw 496 MAG and HO

Notices

Size difference btw 496 MAG and HO

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-14-2024, 08:03 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Size difference btw 496 MAG and HO

Hello,
I am contemplating putting a bravo x and 496 MAG HO into my boat. Need to know if the size is different. STBD side the starter is very close to a stringer, port side is pretty clear. Engine just clears the deck, and air filter just clears. Here are some pictures.






PENN YAN is offline  
Old 07-15-2024, 02:00 AM
  #2  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
bencini231's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Paducah,Ky
Posts: 776
Received 559 Likes on 263 Posts
Default

Both are the same size
bencini231 is online now  
Old 07-15-2024, 08:02 AM
  #3  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bencini231
Both are the same size
thanks, any idea if the outdrive line up is very similar. I cannot shift the engine down at all for example. What about cut out for outdrive, will I need fiberglass work or is existing opening dimensions okay?
PENN YAN is offline  
Old 07-15-2024, 08:16 AM
  #4  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tons of questions now.

Assuming that the HO delivers a bit more torque at ~3500-3600 cruise RPM would the fuel consumption be similar if not better? Maybe with the extra 50hp/more torque I can cruise at 3200-3400 instead?

I have a single engine setup, in a 30ft 11ft beam, 15 deg deadrise pilothouse (Penn Yan 305 Rampage). We tuna fish and it’s 11k boat with crew/ice/gear and I’m wondering if this may be a way to basically pick up 2 knots or so cruise speed and pretty much the same fuel consumption? Current numbers in good seas are 0.7mpg ish. Am I off here, educate me please…
PENN YAN is offline  
Old 07-15-2024, 08:18 AM
  #5  
Forum Regulator
VIP Member
 
Sydwayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 23,895
Received 1,263 Likes on 551 Posts
Default

The 496HO and the 496 Mag are externally IDENTICAL. Cam, programing, and a few different component changes over the years, are the only differences.
Sydwayz is offline  
The following 2 users liked this post by Sydwayz:
Griff (07-15-2024), TeamSaris (07-15-2024)
Old 07-15-2024, 12:38 PM
  #6  
Charter Member # 55
Charter Member
 
Griff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Omaha/LOTO
Posts: 19,711
Received 1,950 Likes on 980 Posts
Default

Same engines with different cam and pcm. IMO, not worth the $$ unless you need to replace a failed engine or drive. You will probably loose cruise speed going a Bravo X on your boat
Griff is online now  
Old 07-16-2024, 07:42 PM
  #7  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Griff
Same engines with different cam and pcm. IMO, not worth the $$ unless you need to replace a failed engine or drive. You will probably loose cruise speed going a Bravo X on your boat
Why is that, the drive ratio?
PENN YAN is offline  
Old 07-16-2024, 10:14 PM
  #8  
VIP Member
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: ankeny,ia.
Posts: 4,089
Received 267 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PENN YAN
Why is that, the drive ratio?
Are you going to put the B3 lower on it?….if not, that is why you’re going to loose speed in your application.
JaayTeee is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.