Size difference btw 496 MAG and HO
#1
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Size difference btw 496 MAG and HO
Hello,
I am contemplating putting a bravo x and 496 MAG HO into my boat. Need to know if the size is different. STBD side the starter is very close to a stringer, port side is pretty clear. Engine just clears the deck, and air filter just clears. Here are some pictures.
I am contemplating putting a bravo x and 496 MAG HO into my boat. Need to know if the size is different. STBD side the starter is very close to a stringer, port side is pretty clear. Engine just clears the deck, and air filter just clears. Here are some pictures.
#2
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Both are the same size
#3
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#4
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tons of questions now.
Assuming that the HO delivers a bit more torque at ~3500-3600 cruise RPM would the fuel consumption be similar if not better? Maybe with the extra 50hp/more torque I can cruise at 3200-3400 instead?
I have a single engine setup, in a 30ft 11ft beam, 15 deg deadrise pilothouse (Penn Yan 305 Rampage). We tuna fish and it’s 11k boat with crew/ice/gear and I’m wondering if this may be a way to basically pick up 2 knots or so cruise speed and pretty much the same fuel consumption? Current numbers in good seas are 0.7mpg ish. Am I off here, educate me please…
Assuming that the HO delivers a bit more torque at ~3500-3600 cruise RPM would the fuel consumption be similar if not better? Maybe with the extra 50hp/more torque I can cruise at 3200-3400 instead?
I have a single engine setup, in a 30ft 11ft beam, 15 deg deadrise pilothouse (Penn Yan 305 Rampage). We tuna fish and it’s 11k boat with crew/ice/gear and I’m wondering if this may be a way to basically pick up 2 knots or so cruise speed and pretty much the same fuel consumption? Current numbers in good seas are 0.7mpg ish. Am I off here, educate me please…
#5
Forum Regulator
VIP Member
The 496HO and the 496 Mag are externally IDENTICAL. Cam, programing, and a few different component changes over the years, are the only differences.
#6
Charter Member # 55
Charter Member
Same engines with different cam and pcm. IMO, not worth the $$ unless you need to replace a failed engine or drive. You will probably loose cruise speed going a Bravo X on your boat
#7
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2021
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#8
VIP Member
VIP Member