Lets Build the Perfect 540
05-21-2004, 09:05 AM
#62
Charter Member #232
Charter MemberThread Starter
Re: Lets Build the Perfect 540
Andy you also asked me for a drive recommendation. I would suggest a look at the Konrads. They make a addaptor set up to convert over your bravo's
Jon
Jon
__________________
Put your best foot forward!
Put your best foot forward!
05-21-2004, 09:33 AM
#63
Registered
Re: Lets Build the Perfect 540
Originally Posted by mcollinstn
cam selection has everything to do with compression ratio.
A "planned" NA motor needs more compression and more cam.
A "planned" blower motor needs low compression and different cam.
Are we looking to build the best "do-anything" motor with big power and lifespan while remaining on a budget?
I think it needs to be port-fuel-injected (Cutler style).
Gapless top rings with low tension oil rings.
.040" squish height (zero deck).
hydraulic roller using extended length factory style lifters (no link bars).
Crank trigger ignition.
crank scraper and windage screen.
Polished and shotpeened rods with ARP bolts.
Head studs.
Valvespring retainers with oil holes for springs (a-la Milodon).
Fluidampr
Good balance job.
There: that's my list of "adds".
A "planned" NA motor needs more compression and more cam.
A "planned" blower motor needs low compression and different cam.
Are we looking to build the best "do-anything" motor with big power and lifespan while remaining on a budget?
I think it needs to be port-fuel-injected (Cutler style).
Gapless top rings with low tension oil rings.
.040" squish height (zero deck).
hydraulic roller using extended length factory style lifters (no link bars).
Crank trigger ignition.
crank scraper and windage screen.
Polished and shotpeened rods with ARP bolts.
Head studs.
Valvespring retainers with oil holes for springs (a-la Milodon).
Fluidampr
Good balance job.
There: that's my list of "adds".
Mcollinstn, Are the zero-gap-top rings durable enough to handle boost and possibly a little detonation should it happen to him? I have been a little out of the loop lately but I have always thought in a sustained boost/RPM engine that zero-gap-seconds would be perferable especially if the piston had a high silicon content. Am I wrong about this?
Roby
