Single Engine 33 Footer
#11
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ST. Louis, MO, USA
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
My fear would be that 1200hp would have a lot of torque, and the prop to transfer that much hp would be pretty large. This could result in a lot of that torque twisting the boat resulting in a poor riding boat with a lot of chine walk. Most of the high hp single engines applications I've seen were on cats. Maybe the wide sponson placement minimizes these effects compared to a V hull. But I guess you can always experiment.
BTW, do you need a crash box? I've got a a spare one.
Gary
BTW, do you need a crash box? I've got a a spare one.
Gary
#12
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Excellent point, thats the kind of info im trying to learn.
What crash box do you have??
email is [email protected]
What crash box do you have??
email is [email protected]
#13
speel chekk this fokker!
Charter Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Locust Valley, New York
Posts: 5,329
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
i'm think maybe a twin drive setup wiath splitter box might be the way to go. Get two smaller wheels in the water driven by one big ole turbine.
__________________
Pardon me, while I whip this out!
Pardon me, while I whip this out!
#14
Registered
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ST. Louis, MO, USA
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The only downside to a splitter box is that if one prop came out of the water, all the torque would be transferrered to the drive still in the water. A bravo wouldn't survive long with that kind of hp. A staggered 18" drive spacing would minimize that though (hopefully).
But a turbine, brake, splitterbox, twin bravo installation would be a relatively practical, lightweight setup for that hp. And with the exception of the turbine, fairly affordable.
Gary
But a turbine, brake, splitterbox, twin bravo installation would be a relatively practical, lightweight setup for that hp. And with the exception of the turbine, fairly affordable.
Gary
#16
speel chekk this fokker!
Charter Member
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Locust Valley, New York
Posts: 5,329
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
i though turbine produced torque graduatually and make HP by spinngin ridiculously high RPMs???
and becasue of that they arne't quite as abusive to drives as say a 700cid 1200hp blown big block
and becasue of that they arne't quite as abusive to drives as say a 700cid 1200hp blown big block
__________________
Pardon me, while I whip this out!
Pardon me, while I whip this out!
#17
Biggest problem is governing power turbine rpm when prop comes out of water or else it'll go bang quickly. Arneson ASD8 can handle the torque I think, (assuming about 6K on the output shaft). You could easily forget having a box at all, just direct couple, and use twin electric motors for maneoverability in the dock. That way you'll also keep the turbine installation as simple as possible, not compromise maneoverability when docking, and have a get you home backup (albeit slow and not too far, but hopefully just far enough to get you out of the sh*t. You'll have some really big batteries on board anyway to start the turbine).
Been waiting for you to get started on this project and have been researching it myself. Unfortunately doing a decent marinisation on the turbine is out of my price range for now.
Cheers
Matt
Been waiting for you to get started on this project and have been researching it myself. Unfortunately doing a decent marinisation on the turbine is out of my price range for now.
Cheers
Matt
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Clay Washington
General Boating Discussion
101
01-16-2006 02:27 PM