Notices
View Poll Results: wort bottle neck for making HP
penut port heads
37
33.33%
stock merc exhaust
8
7.21%
cam
7
6.31%
compresion
0
0%
all of the above
59
53.15%
Voters: 111. You may not vote on this poll

7.4L hop up

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-12-2004, 11:34 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
ragtop409's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Maximo FLA
Posts: 1,322
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Question 7.4L hop up

Ok were do you think the real bottle neck in upping the horse power of a mid 80's-mid 90's 330HP motor is?
1 the penutport heads?
2 the Stock merc exhaust
3 the cam
4 the compresion
5 all of the above

If you do one should you do them all? or is one less important? were talking making 1 HP per cubic inch.
Rag's
ragtop409 is offline  
Old 01-13-2004, 06:38 AM
  #2  
Charter Member #655
Charter Member
 
dyno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 4,939
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

if you do a search "dynos's 330's on roids " you can see what I did....right at 500 hp now!!
__________________
If your boat has a sail do you ride a horse to the ramp?
dyno is offline  
Old 01-13-2004, 07:49 AM
  #3  
Charter Member #655
Charter Member
 
dyno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Holland, Michigan
Posts: 4,939
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

well I had some of the parts from another motor....bought some used here on the board...hard to tell I think I had about 6k in two complete motors but I had one set of heads. Thats with new EMI exhaust.
__________________
If your boat has a sail do you ride a horse to the ramp?
dyno is offline  
Old 01-13-2004, 08:04 AM
  #4  
Registered
 
blue thunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 3,385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I changed heads (to rect) and cam (comp cam) leaving the stock center rise manifolds and flat top pistons and went from 61-62mph to 67-68mph. Didn't have gps when the engines were 330hp, but am estimating low sixties based on how everyone was going past me. I have gps now and ended the year with a 69.6 max speed. I also did a little unshrouding of the valves (Kaama taught me ), which could have factored in. This year I am replace the qjets with 800cfm holleys and installing headers. Still will be running the flat top pistons with a calculated 8.4:1 comp ratio. I think the compression is going to be the bottle neck now and has been slowing me down. Just can't do it all at once on two engines

Dave
blue thunder is offline  
Old 01-13-2004, 08:12 AM
  #5  
ursus
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You forgot none of the above.

1. the peanut port heads - these do no limit the power but the rpm you could make 1hp/ci with them but it would have to be a torquer at like 3500rpm or by supercharging

2. the stock exhaust wiil support 450hp but it would be easier to make this hp with better exhaust

3. cam - you cold prob make 450 hp with this cam with really good heads,headers, and a big bump in CR or by supercharging

4. compression - actually at 8:1 this is great for supercharging but you could also reach that 450hp with great heads/exhaust and a bigger cam

you could replace them all and have a well mannered combination or just do a couple to the extreme and almost reach your goal but have the manners comprimised or you could supercharge and leave everthing the same
 
Old 01-13-2004, 09:06 AM
  #6  
Registered
 
formula31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: ohio
Posts: 2,558
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

My own opinion. Naturally aspirated 454 cu/in. Theres a limit to what you can get out of them for a boat (ie torque). Once its breathing well and has the right cam for the compression and rpm the only thing you can do beyond that is more compression, more cam and more rpm. If one of those 3 is not done, like not wanting to spend the money to turn 6000 rpm, then adding cubic inches is the answer. Ive seen some real radical 454's that ran well look like lawnmower engines once the owner went to 540's. This is all based on heavy v-hulls though and maybe cats or lighter boats are different.
formula31 is offline  
Old 01-13-2004, 09:45 AM
  #7  
Registered
 
Crazyhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Holland MI
Posts: 3,140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Jafo would tell you guys to put in a pair of turbines. They do double-duty as really nice hairdryers.
Crazyhorse is offline  
Old 01-13-2004, 03:50 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ST. Louis, MO, USA
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hmm, seems a small blower would eliminate all those bottleneck problems. I wonder what a 177 with 5psi at 4400 rpm would give for hp.
Anyone got desktop dyno?
Gary
Gary Anderson is offline  
Old 01-13-2004, 10:42 PM
  #9  
Charter Member # 55
Charter Member
 
Griff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Omaha/LOTO
Posts: 19,703
Received 1,938 Likes on 976 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Gary Anderson
Hmm, seems a small blower would eliminate all those bottleneck problems. I wonder what a 177 with 5psi at 4400 rpm would give for hp.
Anyone got desktop dyno?
Gary
A 177 would probably add 80-100hp and eventually add some holes into those cast pistons
Griff is offline  
Old 01-13-2004, 10:45 PM
  #10  
Charter Member # 55
Charter Member
 
Griff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Omaha/LOTO
Posts: 19,703
Received 1,938 Likes on 976 Posts
Default

and you would have to spin it up to the 4800-5000 range.
Griff is offline  


Quick Reply: 7.4L hop up


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.