Pro's vs Con's...Conventional vs Synthetic
08-31-2004, 02:33 PM
#1
Registered
Thread Starter
Pro's vs Con's...Conventional vs Synthetic
I have a 1998 29 scarab with twin 350 mag mpi's with bravo 1's. Interested in opinions on synthetic vs conventional engine oil as well as drive fluid.
08-31-2004, 02:48 PM
#2
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Westport, Kentucky
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
10 Posts
Re: Pro's vs Con's...Conventional vs Synthetic
I don't think that this has ever come up on this board before. You might try going to www.offshoreonly.com and doing a search on Mobil 1, Amsoil, Redline or maybe KY jelly. Who knows, maybe it has been asked before.
I swear, if I sit through another oil thread I may get a sailboat.
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/s...ad.php?t=83930
I swear, if I sit through another oil thread I may get a sailboat.
http://www.offshoreonly.com/forums/s...ad.php?t=83930
08-31-2004, 02:54 PM
#3
Registered
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Westport, Kentucky
Posts: 1,376
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes
on
10 Posts
Re: Pro's vs Con's...Conventional vs Synthetic
Bern,
Not busting your balls or anything, just saw you joined it July and may not know how to use the features of the board. Use the search function near the top right of the page. You will still not get the answer you want if you are looking for a Y/N.
Not busting your balls or anything, just saw you joined it July and may not know how to use the features of the board. Use the search function near the top right of the page. You will still not get the answer you want if you are looking for a Y/N.
08-31-2004, 08:38 PM
#5
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Re: Pro's vs Con's...Conventional vs Synthetic
Short version.
Full synthetic is "better". It maintains viscosity longer because it has higher viscosity base stocks with less longchain viscosity enhancers that break down during use due to shear. It can withstand higher temps without breaking down or "coking". It remains fluid at low temps. It also costs more.
Modern conventional oil is good stuff. In a marine application near stock power levels, there should be no internal event that requires a more durable lubricant than good ole conventional stocks.
The usage pattern of boats involves hard running interrupted by long periods of sitting (when compared to the more regular light duty use seen in an automobile). This usage pattern REQUIRES frequent lube changes regardless of what kind, type, or price of lube you run.
Some people think it is a better idea to use conventional stocks and change them very often. Other people think it is an even better idea to use synthetic lubes. But they STILL need changed out just as often due to the fuel dilution and contamination aspects.
Bottom line:
With stock power, conventional is fine if changed frequently - if cost is no object, then synthetic is "better" in all categories.
With heavily modified motors, synthetic lubes and their higher prices can be more easily justified.
Gear lube? Outdrives do NOT hold enough lube. They need changed frequently in performance applications. Synthetic generally runs at cooler temps and provides additional protection against spalling and gear face wear. Synthetics may not tolerate water intrusion as well as the Merc hi perf lube.
That's the short version.
Full synthetic is "better". It maintains viscosity longer because it has higher viscosity base stocks with less longchain viscosity enhancers that break down during use due to shear. It can withstand higher temps without breaking down or "coking". It remains fluid at low temps. It also costs more.
Modern conventional oil is good stuff. In a marine application near stock power levels, there should be no internal event that requires a more durable lubricant than good ole conventional stocks.
The usage pattern of boats involves hard running interrupted by long periods of sitting (when compared to the more regular light duty use seen in an automobile). This usage pattern REQUIRES frequent lube changes regardless of what kind, type, or price of lube you run.
Some people think it is a better idea to use conventional stocks and change them very often. Other people think it is an even better idea to use synthetic lubes. But they STILL need changed out just as often due to the fuel dilution and contamination aspects.
Bottom line:
With stock power, conventional is fine if changed frequently - if cost is no object, then synthetic is "better" in all categories.
With heavily modified motors, synthetic lubes and their higher prices can be more easily justified.
Gear lube? Outdrives do NOT hold enough lube. They need changed frequently in performance applications. Synthetic generally runs at cooler temps and provides additional protection against spalling and gear face wear. Synthetics may not tolerate water intrusion as well as the Merc hi perf lube.
That's the short version.
08-31-2004, 08:41 PM
#6
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Deland, Florida
Posts: 25,191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Pro's vs Con's...Conventional vs Synthetic
Mike, give us the long version. 
I was just out in my garage and I thought of a question I wanted to ask you, but I've already forgotten what it is.
I was just out in my garage and I thought of a question I wanted to ask you, but I've already forgotten what it is.
09-01-2004, 08:21 PM
#7
Gold Member
Re: Pro's vs Con's...Conventional vs Synthetic
Originally Posted by mcollinstn
Short version.
Full synthetic is "better". It maintains viscosity longer because it has higher viscosity base stocks with less longchain viscosity enhancers that break down during use due to shear. It can withstand higher temps without breaking down or "coking". It remains fluid at low temps. It also costs more.
Modern conventional oil is good stuff. In a marine application near stock power levels, there should be no internal event that requires a more durable lubricant than good ole conventional stocks.
The usage pattern of boats involves hard running interrupted by long periods of sitting (when compared to the more regular light duty use seen in an automobile). This usage pattern REQUIRES frequent lube changes regardless of what kind, type, or price of lube you run.
Some people think it is a better idea to use conventional stocks and change them very often. Other people think it is an even better idea to use synthetic lubes. But they STILL need changed out just as often due to the fuel dilution and contamination aspects.
Bottom line:
With stock power, conventional is fine if changed frequently - if cost is no object, then synthetic is "better" in all categories.
With heavily modified motors, synthetic lubes and their higher prices can be more easily justified.
Gear lube? Outdrives do NOT hold enough lube. They need changed frequently in performance applications. Synthetic generally runs at cooler temps and provides additional protection against spalling and gear face wear. Synthetics may not tolerate water intrusion as well as the Merc hi perf lube.
That's the short version.
Full synthetic is "better". It maintains viscosity longer because it has higher viscosity base stocks with less longchain viscosity enhancers that break down during use due to shear. It can withstand higher temps without breaking down or "coking". It remains fluid at low temps. It also costs more.
Modern conventional oil is good stuff. In a marine application near stock power levels, there should be no internal event that requires a more durable lubricant than good ole conventional stocks.
The usage pattern of boats involves hard running interrupted by long periods of sitting (when compared to the more regular light duty use seen in an automobile). This usage pattern REQUIRES frequent lube changes regardless of what kind, type, or price of lube you run.
Some people think it is a better idea to use conventional stocks and change them very often. Other people think it is an even better idea to use synthetic lubes. But they STILL need changed out just as often due to the fuel dilution and contamination aspects.
Bottom line:
With stock power, conventional is fine if changed frequently - if cost is no object, then synthetic is "better" in all categories.
With heavily modified motors, synthetic lubes and their higher prices can be more easily justified.
Gear lube? Outdrives do NOT hold enough lube. They need changed frequently in performance applications. Synthetic generally runs at cooler temps and provides additional protection against spalling and gear face wear. Synthetics may not tolerate water intrusion as well as the Merc hi perf lube.
That's the short version.
