Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Technical > General Q & A
cam question, stroke vs. duration @ .050 >

cam question, stroke vs. duration @ .050

Notices

cam question, stroke vs. duration @ .050

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-03-2004, 08:15 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
ratman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: medellin colombia, pablo escobar's lil town
Posts: 8,390
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default cam question, stroke vs. duration @ .050

i need some advice from rmbuilder or one of you other engine builders. i am building blown 588ci under square engs. 4.625 stroke 4.500 bore . crane cam 139661 was recomended. the cam has .632 lift 256/264 @ .050 . the cam card states recomended rpm range 4000 to 7200. i don't plan on turning me engines over 5600 with a 5800 rev limit. im running dart 360 cnc heads. do you think this is to much cam for my planned rpm range? thanks in advance for any advice you can offer. wanna cam it right the first time. ratman
ratman is offline  
Old 12-03-2004, 11:09 PM
  #2  
Off the Radar
Platinum Member
 
Linster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Short Pump or Colonial Beach, VA
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default Re: cam question, stroke vs. duration @ .050

I would back that cam down a size. A blower seems to mellow a cam out but with something that large, the motor is not going to want to idle under 1200-1400 RPM. If you have bravo's that will be an issue. That engine combo will be an issue with a Bravo as well. With that much idle, docking is going to be tough. The surge on that engine is going to increase with a larger cam. Also it will take a lot of blower to fill that large cam & those huge heads. I would think it would take a 12-71 to make that combo work. A 10-71 may do it, but you will be spining it real hard.

I did a 572, 8-71 blower motor last year for a buddy of mine. I used a 244/252 cam . That worked real well. It sounded good and would idle down to 900-1000. It really needed a 10-71 but we got it to work with 7% overdrive.

Good Luck

Last edited by Linster; 12-03-2004 at 11:13 PM.
Linster is offline  
Old 12-04-2004, 02:05 AM
  #3  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
ratman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: medellin colombia, pablo escobar's lil town
Posts: 8,390
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Re: cam question, stroke vs. duration @ .050

i am running 1071's with 2 850 cfm carbs, thx
ratman is offline  
Old 12-04-2004, 08:52 AM
  #4  
cstraub69@comcast
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: cam question, stroke vs. duration @ .050

You need no where near that much cam, something in the 240's max.

Chris
 
Old 12-04-2004, 09:07 AM
  #5  
10x
10x
VIP Member
 
10x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: La Grange Ill
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: cam question, stroke vs. duration @ .050

Linster gave you good advice. The # 139651 cam with 244/256 works excellent for your situation. We have used that grind and VERY similiar ones with great success. My 557's would idle down to 900 rpm and not stall in gear at 650 rpm.
For the rpm's you're lookin to turn, make sure you have atleast 160#'s on the seat, and around #425-440 at 635 lift. This cam has a perfect cruise speed between 3500-4000 rpm. Install it on a 114 lobe separation, and you'll be fine.
BTW, I hope you don't intend on installing these engines in front of Bravo's?
__________________
Fountain powerboats rule "The Preacher"
Chicago Powerboat Club Director
[email protected]
www.chicagopowerboat.com
10x is offline  
Old 12-04-2004, 10:18 AM
  #6  
Registered
 
PatriYacht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Waterford,MI
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: cam question, stroke vs. duration @ .050

I have 2 of those 651 cams that I'm taking out right now. Very low hours maybe 40 total. Look like new. Cheap to a good home.
PatriYacht is offline  
Old 12-04-2004, 10:54 AM
  #7  
10x
10x
VIP Member
 
10x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: La Grange Ill
Posts: 4,800
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: cam question, stroke vs. duration @ .050

Why are you replacing them, and with what other?
__________________
Fountain powerboats rule "The Preacher"
Chicago Powerboat Club Director
[email protected]
www.chicagopowerboat.com
10x is offline  
Old 12-04-2004, 06:09 PM
  #8  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
ratman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: medellin colombia, pablo escobar's lil town
Posts: 8,390
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Re: cam question, stroke vs. duration @ .050

10X , im running ssm#3a's 1.5 ratio with 11 plate trans. i think the drives will hold up with three blade props.
ratman is offline  
Old 12-04-2004, 06:43 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
PatriYacht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Waterford,MI
Posts: 2,867
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Re: cam question, stroke vs. duration @ .050

Frank, they don't work well with my heads in my aplication. 540 n/a with AFR heads. Check out the threads about AFR heads. Those guys are using less duration.
PatriYacht is offline  
Old 12-05-2004, 08:43 PM
  #10  
Registered
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 3,682
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default Re: cam question, stroke vs. duration @ .050

Linster's right on the money. A cam that starts at 4000 will never let you load it at idle rpm. Who ever told you to use that cam in an offshore boat?
Edward R. Cozzi is offline  


Quick Reply: cam question, stroke vs. duration @ .050


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.