ok this may be a stupid question......
#1
VIP Member
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
ok this may be a stupid question......
how come no one makes a Big straight 6 like 400-500 cu inch, 400hp +.
seems like it would be easier to work on in a boat with a twin setup,
and reduced weight.
seems like it would be easier to work on in a boat with a twin setup,
and reduced weight.
#2
Registered
Re: ok this may be a stupid question......
Hmmm... interesting thought. And it would sound like a bread truck. Seems that the old pickup trucks with straight six's did pull pretty good.
#3
Re: ok this may be a stupid question......
There was an old Mathews that I worked on in the 60's that had a big 6 cylinder (about the size of a vw bug) that had twin plugs in the top for each cylinder. Cant remember the brand name but it was in a very old 40 ft mathews, single screw.
#5
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 8,306
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: ok this may be a stupid question......
There used to be an engine builder years ago that made HUGE gas 6 cylinder engines for trucks... The name of the engine was " Hall-Scott"... They made small engines also for cars back in the late twenties. But... most people don't know that inline 6 cylinder engines of the same cubic inches as a V-8 weigh more... a lot more.
You have 7 main bearings instead of 5. The block and crankshaft are heavier. Instead of only 4 throws for the 8 cylinders.. Each cylinder has it's own crankshaft throw. The only advantage is width. Not too many people make speed equipment for inline 6 cylinder engines.
You have 7 main bearings instead of 5. The block and crankshaft are heavier. Instead of only 4 throws for the 8 cylinders.. Each cylinder has it's own crankshaft throw. The only advantage is width. Not too many people make speed equipment for inline 6 cylinder engines.
#6
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 8,306
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: ok this may be a stupid question......
Originally Posted by Falcon
What would be interesting is a pair of narrow angle v6's with screw chargers! I'll bet they could get to the 400hp range.
#7
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lewis Center, Ohio
Posts: 3,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: ok this may be a stupid question......
Originally Posted by Reed Jensen
That is what "Torque" motors was trying to do with their 60 degree V-12... make a narrow, powerful, unsupercharged engine. But they had too many "issues"...
#8
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 8,306
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: ok this may be a stupid question......
Originally Posted by HyperBaja
Any update on how callan did with these last race season?
#9
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
Re: ok this may be a stupid question......
Originally Posted by wwwTOPDJcom
how come no one makes a Big straight 6 like 400-500 cu inch, 400hp +.
seems like it would be easier to work on in a boat with a twin setup,
and reduced weight.
seems like it would be easier to work on in a boat with a twin setup,
and reduced weight.
As far as a big gas motor, 4 liters is about the high end of the range for a straight six.
Hop up parts? Here you go:
http://www.cliffordperformance.com/
#10
Registered
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Los Angeles California
Posts: 8,306
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes
on
2 Posts
Re: ok this may be a stupid question......
Originally Posted by mcollinstn
You never heard of a Cummins or Caterpillar? I assure you the narrow-ness of an inline six is a benefit.
As far as a big gas motor, 4 liters is about the high end of the range for a straight six.
Hop up parts? Here you go:
http://www.cliffordperformance.com/
As far as a big gas motor, 4 liters is about the high end of the range for a straight six.
Hop up parts? Here you go:
http://www.cliffordperformance.com/