APBA vs. Offshore LLC Settlement?????
09-30-2003, 11:00 PM
#51
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: orange beach,al.
Posts: 163
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't believe G.M. cares whether it A.P.B.A. or not.They wan't a good venue with a lot of happy fans driving quality G.M.C. products and not a bunch of rumors and bickering.
10-01-2003, 07:15 AM
#52
Registered
Originally posted by Just Browsing
Without being prompted by someone else, or by having first hand information yourself, which would preclude the necessity for asking the question in the first place, you couldn't begin to ask those detailed questions.
So then who DID you speak to in order to "just ask" explicit questions which seem to suggest that in fact some of those things may have happened?
- Just asking.
Without being prompted by someone else, or by having first hand information yourself, which would preclude the necessity for asking the question in the first place, you couldn't begin to ask those detailed questions.
So then who DID you speak to in order to "just ask" explicit questions which seem to suggest that in fact some of those things may have happened?
- Just asking.
) I have repeatedly stated that I have spoken with friends that are current racers or crew members that have given me various amounts of information. That, combined with my knowledge and understanding of the people and events that have unfolded over the past 10 years in APBA and APBA LLC these are questions that have come to mind. Questions that I thought of all by MYSELF. Imagine that...independant thinking. What a novel idea. You people all seem to think that just because I am not a current member of APBA or APBA LLC that I am unable to have any knowledge of the goings on. Sorry to disappoint you. You also all seem to think that if someone (like myself) asks questions that can be answered simply and HONESTLY, they are immediately ANTI-LLC! Such is NOT the case. What is the case however, is my never ending quest for the TRUTH! I would hope you would all like the same. Keep in mind, ASKING questions and MAKING STATEMENTS are far cries from one another. One insinuates knowledge of FACT, the other seeks it!Shane...Just ANSWERING AGAIN AND AGAIN!
10-01-2003, 07:58 AM
#53
Allergic to Nonsense
Platinum Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Granite Quarry, NC
Posts: 5,011
Likes: 0
Received 18 Likes
on
18 Posts
Originally posted by T2x
You know what....... ? Maybe we should all wait and see what transpires. At least this story will play out in black and white......
T2x
You know what....... ? Maybe we should all wait and see what transpires. At least this story will play out in black and white......
T2x
T2x
10-01-2003, 08:39 AM
#54
Guest
Posts: n/a
Just Browsing,
Thank you for neatly wording that conclusion.
I think once again we are witnessing Mr. Mills creative marketing techniques....of himself, and getting his message across.
You don't need to post anything once you have 100 "highly confidential" phone conversations
Thank you for neatly wording that conclusion.
I think once again we are witnessing Mr. Mills creative marketing techniques....of himself, and getting his message across.
You don't need to post anything once you have 100 "highly confidential" phone conversations
10-01-2003, 08:50 AM
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
Originally posted by Mike A.
Why I stay in this sport in this capacaity is beyond me.
Mr. Hearn is wrong about the settlement. Mr. Brain is wrong about GM. Mr. Barrett is wrong about everything.
Believe what you want but we will see everyone in Lauderdale, St. Pete and Orange Beach for the APBA/UIM World Championships.
Mike A.
Why I stay in this sport in this capacaity is beyond me.
Mr. Hearn is wrong about the settlement. Mr. Brain is wrong about GM. Mr. Barrett is wrong about everything.
Believe what you want but we will see everyone in Lauderdale, St. Pete and Orange Beach for the APBA/UIM World Championships.
Mike A.
10-01-2003, 10:25 AM
#56
Guest
Posts: n/a
What is Truth? -Pilate
Originally posted by Mike A.
***Mr. Hearn is wrong about the settlement. ***
Mike A.
***Mr. Hearn is wrong about the settlement. ***
Mike A.
The facts:
1. We have a settlement agreement which was prepared by Mr. A's attorney and then forwarded to the APBA interim BOD for approval.
2. We have been going over the settlement terms for weeks fine-tuning the agreement and the language and this was completed with the final version being faxed by Mr. A.'s attorney on September 25.
3. The final version was approved at the interim BOD meeting last Friday and Mr. Allweiss was fully aware of not only the terms of the agreement but also that the meeting was going to take place. Mr. Allweiss chose not to participate. I have no idea why.
4. On Tuesday, in Court, Mr. Allweiss' attorney, Mr. Gaglione, made two additional demands never before discussed one of which was in direct conflict with a term of the settlement. If you want to know what they were, get them from Mr. Allweiss. By the way, the representation from Mr. A's attorney was that one of the demands was being made by Mr. Jones which is very interesting since Mr. Jones voted in favor of the settlement on Friday which did not include that term.
5. Mr. Allweiss has no interest in abiding by any agreement he makes with the APBA. By the way, #5 is just my opinion!
14-H.
10-01-2003, 10:47 AM
#58
Registered
Re: What is Truth? -Pilate
Originally posted by 14-H
Well, alrighty then: Mr. Allweiss says I'm wrong... ergo: I must be wrong????
The facts:
1. We have a settlement agreement which was prepared by Mr. A's attorney and then forwarded to the APBA interim BOD for approval.
2. We have been going over the settlement terms for weeks fine-tuning the agreement and the language and this was completed with the final version being faxed by Mr. A.'s attorney on September 25.
3. The final version was approved at the interim BOD meeting last Friday and Mr. Allweiss was fully aware of not only the terms of the agreement but also that the meeting was going to take place. Mr. Allweiss chose not to participate. I have no idea why.
4. On Tuesday, in Court, Mr. Allweiss' attorney, Mr. Gaglione, made two additional demands never before discussed one of which was in direct conflict with a term of the settlement. If you want to know what they were, get them from Mr. Allweiss. By the way, the representation from Mr. A's attorney was that one of the demands was being made by Mr. Jones which is very interesting since Mr. Jones voted in favor of the settlement on Friday which did not include that term.
5. Mr. Allweiss has no interest in abiding by any agreement he makes with the APBA. By the way, #5 is just my opinion!
14-H.
Well, alrighty then: Mr. Allweiss says I'm wrong... ergo: I must be wrong????
The facts:
1. We have a settlement agreement which was prepared by Mr. A's attorney and then forwarded to the APBA interim BOD for approval.
2. We have been going over the settlement terms for weeks fine-tuning the agreement and the language and this was completed with the final version being faxed by Mr. A.'s attorney on September 25.
3. The final version was approved at the interim BOD meeting last Friday and Mr. Allweiss was fully aware of not only the terms of the agreement but also that the meeting was going to take place. Mr. Allweiss chose not to participate. I have no idea why.
4. On Tuesday, in Court, Mr. Allweiss' attorney, Mr. Gaglione, made two additional demands never before discussed one of which was in direct conflict with a term of the settlement. If you want to know what they were, get them from Mr. Allweiss. By the way, the representation from Mr. A's attorney was that one of the demands was being made by Mr. Jones which is very interesting since Mr. Jones voted in favor of the settlement on Friday which did not include that term.
5. Mr. Allweiss has no interest in abiding by any agreement he makes with the APBA. By the way, #5 is just my opinion!
14-H.
Would YOU please provide for us the specifics of what differed between the two agreements? If not, why not? Given the nature of the situation I think it will assist us all in having a more comprehensive understanding as to the nature of the situation. It would also reduce (IMO) the amount of speculation and conjecture that has either been thrown about or accused thereof. Additionally, I personally (for what that's worth) believe that if you are making such claims that there were in fact differences that it would stregthen and lend credibility to your argument.
Thank you in advance.
Last edited by Shane; 10-01-2003 at 10:51 AM.
10-01-2003, 10:51 AM
#59
Guest
Posts: n/a
Changed thier minds??
FYI = A vote putting Mike A on the BOD was approved by the BOD 10-2.Same BOD as today.
Looks like even your people change their minds despite what the BOD voted,,sometimes,,,,right 14h?
Looks like even your people change their minds despite what the BOD voted,,sometimes,,,,right 14h?
Last edited by ModMachine; 10-01-2003 at 10:54 AM.
10-01-2003, 10:53 AM
#60
Registered
See, I told you all that when approriate I would ask the tough questions of both sides in this matter.
Patience is a virtue..... of which I have NONE!
(Patience that is)
Patience is a virtue..... of which I have NONE!
(Patience that is)
