Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Nordic
the initial #s are in >

the initial #s are in

Notices

the initial #s are in

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-01-2007, 10:01 AM
  #101  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Steve Zuckerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nashvegas, TN
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bobl
I did a little more testing yesterday and got some data. It ran 92.2 right at 6000 RPM with the 29 P5X. Smooth water, 90 degree temp, 2 people, full fuel. I think I'm going to order a 32 B1 and try it. I'd like to get the rpm to around 5800.
Hey Bob,
Sounds great. I am bringing the Merc lab 32" that I ran 94.5 light (@ 5700) to the Jamboree if you want to test it. It's pretty sweet. Please bring the 29" P5X. I would like to test it.
Regards,
Steve
Steve Zuckerman is offline  
Old 06-01-2007, 05:06 PM
  #102  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Rage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So with the 8.5:1 compression, head work and new cam but the same boost as before you made slightly more hp than before? Then you opened up the TB and increased the boost and got the final big jump in hp?

Originally Posted by bobl
I made a lot of changes so there's no way to really say what made the difference. I lowered the compression from 9.5 to 8.5, had a custom cam ground and of course the head work. I also ported the throttle body quite a bit. Before the throttle body mods it made just slightly more HP than before. So, it would appear the cam and head work offset the compression reduction. Then I was able to increase the boost to get back to where I was, compression wise.
Rage is offline  
Old 06-01-2007, 05:19 PM
  #103  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Spicewood, Texas USA
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Yes that is basically correct. However, it hit a bottleneck and would not pull past 5600 with the 7 psi pulley before, so I couldn't really raise the boost in application. I just tried it on one dyno run. It made 800 HP at 6000 rpm with 5.5 psi boost before. After the rebuild it made less than 5 psi boost with the same pulley and made just slightly more power. Changing pulleys raised the boost to 6.5 and it would pull all the way to 6000. I talked to Dustin about raising the boost and he told me to port the throttle body because it was a restriction at that HP level. Doing so raised the boost 1 psi and picked up about 50 HP.

Bob

Originally Posted by Rage
So with the 8.5:1 compression, head work and new cam but the same boost as before you made slightly more hp than before? Then you opened up the TB and increased the boost and got the final big jump in hp?
bobl is offline  
Old 06-08-2007, 09:28 AM
  #104  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
Rage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Missouri
Posts: 1,987
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

How big was the TB before and after you opened it up?

Originally Posted by bobl
Yes that is basically correct. However, it hit a bottleneck and would not pull past 5600 with the 7 psi pulley before, so I couldn't really raise the boost in application. I just tried it on one dyno run. It made 800 HP at 6000 rpm with 5.5 psi boost before. After the rebuild it made less than 5 psi boost with the same pulley and made just slightly more power. Changing pulleys raised the boost to 6.5 and it would pull all the way to 6000. I talked to Dustin about raising the boost and he told me to port the throttle body because it was a restriction at that HP level. Doing so raised the boost 1 psi and picked up about 50 HP.

Bob
Rage is offline  
Old 06-08-2007, 12:48 PM
  #105  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Spicewood, Texas USA
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

It's a huge 2000+ cfm throttle body. The problem is the way it is machined for the flame arrestor, which sits inside, causes a significant restriction when the FA is installed. By opening it up beneath the FA you gain a lot of surface area for air to pass through.

Originally Posted by Rage
How big was the TB before and after you opened it up?
bobl is offline  
Old 06-25-2007, 08:29 AM
  #106  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Steve Zuckerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nashvegas, TN
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default thanks BobL

Bob,
I ran the boat before leaving Cumberland yesterday. It ran a quick 90 @ 5850 with my 28". Went straight back to the dock and put your 29P5-X on. Boat handled great, acelleration was very close to the 28". It took me a little farther to run it out, and every time I got to 90 I would get into rough water and have to back down. It ran 90 @ 5700, but felt like it was still pulling, maybe another mile and hour or 2.
I think it would be a good all round prop, keep my Rs down some, and be more efficient (fuel) in the mid range.
It was good to see you and the Texas crew.
Your 29" is going out via UPS this morning. Thanks for letting me borrow it.
Steve Zuckerman is offline  
Old 06-25-2007, 09:16 AM
  #107  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Cincinnati Ohio
Posts: 1,751
Received 10 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Steve and Bob,

Has anyone tried the PX-5 on the 35 Nordic? I tried Mercury's Maximus offering with little success. From watching both of you last Saturday they certainly work for the 25 and 28.

Bob, that 25 is a rocket ship!
39 Unlimited is offline  
Old 06-25-2007, 11:42 AM
  #108  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Steve Zuckerman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Nashvegas, TN
Posts: 2,621
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Nordic Gary
Steve and Bob,

Has anyone tried the PX-5 on the 35 Nordic? I tried Mercury's Maximus offering with little success. From watching both of you last Saturday they certainly work for the 25 and 28.

Bob, that 25 is a rocket ship!
Gary,
I am not sure if anyone's tried them on a Flame? I would ask Matt and Julie at Throttle-Up www.throttle-up.com .
I agree on the Maximus. It's a big windmill. Matt tells me with a lot of work, they can be made to run, but it's a lot easier to start with a Hydromotive.
I have a friend who is running P5-Xs (stock 30s") on his 42' Fountain with modified 575s. It's running in the low 90s, so they are working on his step bottom with twins. Seems like they would also work on a Flame.
Regards,
Steve
Steve Zuckerman is offline  
Old 06-25-2007, 11:55 AM
  #109  
Registered
 
Nordicflame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Layton, Utah
Posts: 1,546
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

They were running 5 blades on the single engine (1200hp)Flame (IMCO) with the splitter but I don't remember which. If memory serves me it was running 100+. I'm sure the weighting difference would make it a non apples to apples comparison though. It does make me think that it likes transom lift which the single engine setup was creating. Just a thought

I'd be interested to know as well.

Dave
Nordicflame is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Hy-Velocity
General Q & A
3
05-16-2005 08:12 AM
JeffWoods
General Q & A
14
04-21-2004 09:40 AM
convincor
General Q & A
6
06-16-2003 06:35 PM
Pure Energy
General Q & A
9
08-22-2002 10:40 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Quick Reply: the initial #s are in


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.