Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Pantera
Anybody Try a Surface Drive(s) on a 28? >

Anybody Try a Surface Drive(s) on a 28?

Notices

Anybody Try a Surface Drive(s) on a 28?

Thread Tools
 
Old 09-24-2007, 05:21 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mansfield, TX
Posts: 6,412
Received 296 Likes on 178 Posts
Default Anybody Try a Surface Drive(s) on a 28?

Just wondering if its ever been done. I've always thought a 28 with twin 350's and surface drives would be a great package.

Why some might say????? So I can go 80+ on a pair of 350's.
Why not just get bigger power????? Its cheaper to replace a 350 if one blows, and they should last longer. Also - less gas means that I get to boat more.
TexomaPowerboater is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 05:42 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
bouyhunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Apache Jct. AZ
Posts: 5,646
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Very interesting proposition there Andy.

Plus that could mean a badazz rooster!!
bouyhunter is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 06:20 PM
  #3  
Banned
Gold Member
 
Elite Marine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: IL
Posts: 5,660
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I know a guy that had a surface drive on a single V with big power. Took him 1/4 mile to get on plane and then when he needed to stop, he had to get off the sticks and coast for a long time due to no drag at all.

He yanked the Arneson off and installed a Konrad.

Twins may work, but why would you need a surface drive on 350's?
Elite Marine is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 06:40 PM
  #4  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Mansfield, TX
Posts: 6,412
Received 296 Likes on 178 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pantera28-650HP
Twins may work, but why would you need a surface drive on 350's?
To go faster. A twin with 6.2's will do around 70mph..............if the surface drives could get you to 80mph, then wouldn't it be worth it..........it would to me.
TexomaPowerboater is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 06:40 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,908
Likes: 0
Received 136 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

I think bow lift might be a problem
tomcei is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 07:00 PM
  #6  
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
IRONMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: south east of dome island
Posts: 1,235
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Quite some time ago I had installed some on a 28 cig but this was before the Bravo drive was invented. Power handling was necessary for the twin turbo 350's over the merc alpha style drives. If the hull has some rocker it should work well. From my experience with some Kaama Formulas and the Cig 28 I could not recomend arnesons for the 28 Pantera hull unless possibly it has the notched transom and maybe some added rocker in the hull and some huge power(ie 406 blower moters). Jo could shed more light on this subject though than I possibly could. Personally I would try some 3 inch shorties on one before ever going with arnesons because you could always return to stock if you needed to.

Last edited by IRONMAN; 09-24-2007 at 07:05 PM. Reason: add
IRONMAN is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 07:11 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Dude! Sweet!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Does the parasitic drag of the trannies out weigh the benefit of running a surfacing prop (compared to a Bravo)?
Dude! Sweet! is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 07:57 PM
  #8  
Charter Member
Charter Member
 
IRONMAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: south east of dome island
Posts: 1,235
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

No, I think the leverage to lift the bow is the limiting factor as to what hull will work well with surface drives. We even built a hull specifically for the arneson drive back in the early 80's( lots of rocker, pad bottom) and still had problems with bow lift. It was virtually uncontrollable with 300 hp V8 and the arneson at 45 mph yet could run nearly 60 easily with a tired 100 outboard in a 24' boat. Search on the Donzi classic 22 differences for the Blackhawk drive. The Blackhawk hull has a lot of rocker and that is what makes it work. Parasitic drag of the tranny is probably not a concern, The propshaft HP is probably very close to any standard IO type drive W/O a Transmission

Last edited by IRONMAN; 09-24-2007 at 07:59 PM. Reason: add
IRONMAN is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 08:43 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
bouyhunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Apache Jct. AZ
Posts: 5,646
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dude! Sweet!
Does the parasitic drag of the trannies out weigh the benefit of running a surfacing prop (compared to a Bravo)?
Sean - you're using some big words there...
bouyhunter is offline  
Old 09-24-2007, 09:03 PM
  #10  
JC Performance Engines
Gold Member
 
Stormrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 8,891
Received 23 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

lets just see how that 28AT runs. or doesn't
Stormrider is offline  


Quick Reply: Anybody Try a Surface Drive(s) on a 28?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.