Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Powerquest
Realistic speed numbers for a 280 >

Realistic speed numbers for a 280

Notices

Realistic speed numbers for a 280

Thread Tools
 
Old 12-07-2007, 03:23 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: powhatan, Va.
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Realistic speed numbers for a 280

I really like the Silencer and have a couple that I'm considering. A decision breaker is performance. I would like to know Realistic speed numbers for a 280 silencer with a 502mpi. Boat in question has the fairing(not windshield), trim tabs and drive shower. Is a 2001 but less than 100 hrs.
Also know of a 2004 with a 496HO. Can you guys help me out?
thecurti is offline  
Old 12-07-2007, 04:55 PM
  #2  
21 and 42 footers
Platinum Member
 
t500hps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Richmond VA
Posts: 8,191
Received 129 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Not Right here on OSO has that same boat....I seem to remember him saying it would just kiss the 70 mph mark but not positive I have that correct.
t500hps is offline  
Old 12-07-2007, 06:24 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
Macklin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Virginia Beach
Posts: 1,914
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by t500hps
Not Right here on OSO has that same boat....I seem to remember him saying it would just kiss the 70 mph mark but not positive I have that correct.
You are correct grasshopper.

BillR had one with a 502 mag. He actually got a tad over 70 with a really fast prop. I had a Baja 272 with same engine and upgrades....stainless marine exhaust and vortech flame arrestor....and he would just barely pull away from me at 68 gps. (I definitely had a strong motor in that boat!) That's in salt. Take a mile or two off of that in fresh.

Great boat. Ran A LOT better on the lower Chesapeake Bay than my Baja. Then we both moved up to PQ 340's. Man, was it nice not having to go to the chiropractor every Monday morning after a long run across the Bay.

Oh, BTW, I vote for the HO. SWEET motor! And they redesigned the BS exhaust system the 502 has. First question for the 502 owner is "have you upgraded the exhaust".

Last edited by Macklin; 12-07-2007 at 06:32 PM.
Macklin is offline  
Old 12-08-2007, 01:56 AM
  #4  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oshvegas WI
Posts: 520
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

best friends family has a 2003 280, carb 500 with cmi sweeper headers, runs 73 any day, but nothing more......
JUKED YOU is offline  
Old 12-09-2007, 08:48 AM
  #5  
OSO Moderator
Charter Member
 
BillR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Posts: 3,580
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Ditto on what Macklin said. Also the 502 boat is faster out of the hole and has more room around the motor than the 496 equipped boats.
It was a great boat!!!!
__________________
BillR

'00 Scarab Sport 302 CC
'02 Cigarette Top Gun TS
'02 PQ 340
'00 PQ 280
'98 Scarab 22
'97 Baja Outlaw 20
'72 Checkmate
'65 Glastron
BillR is offline  
Old 12-09-2007, 03:46 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 1,025
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

My top speed has been 71 GPS so far.
MacGyver is offline  
Old 12-09-2007, 08:44 PM
  #7  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: powhatan, Va.
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks everybody. I am familiar with the 502, that's what I had in my last boat. Trying to find a 27-29 ft performance boat, that will run mid 70's and still be within my price range is proving tough.
Funny thing is my Stingray 230sx , with the 502mpi would only run 70 GPS, how does the same motor push a 28 the same speed?
Did they make the Silencer with a 500efi?
thecurti is offline  
Old 12-09-2007, 09:17 PM
  #8  
Pressurized
Platinum Member
 
performancemary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had a 1999 280 with the 502 and bravo four blade , I believe 26' Tops was 65. Didn't have tabs
performancemary is offline  
Old 12-10-2007, 06:08 AM
  #9  
Member #9
Charter Member
 
hp500efi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pewaukee, WI
Posts: 4,273
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

middle 60's is more realistic .... fuel, people, gear ... boat runs 65 ... lighten the load, play with props etc and you are upper 60's.
__________________
Member of the Liquid Jungle
hp500efi is offline  
Old 12-10-2007, 09:31 AM
  #10  
Registered
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Long Island
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I bought hp500efi's 280, added CMI headers, 1" drive spacer, K&N flame arrester, and lab finished 26" B-1. With 2 people (400 lbs) 1/2 tank fuel 68.6 GPS. By myself a touch shy of 70. Sending the prop back to BBlades for a little more tinkering....
slider1 is offline  


Quick Reply: Realistic speed numbers for a 280


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.