Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Powerquest
PQ General Discussion >

PQ General Discussion

Notices

PQ General Discussion

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-28-2013, 07:30 AM
  #3641  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Ray Twp. Michigan
Posts: 812
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Pwraddr
So, what's new fellas? I'm still trying to decide what to do about power for the Vyper....
The more power/speed thing out of a boat is always a tough decision. How much faster do you want to go and then figure 20hp a side to do it. Also, how much time do you spend at or near w.o.t. to use your additional power and money you put in to it. IMO, if your engines are running great and reliable and you don’t plan on having your boat a long time I would leave it alone and put the money towards the next boat that’s already faster. The problem with boats are whatever you do to them you rarely get your money back for any of the upgrades/power improvements etc. when you go to sell.
johnny b good is offline  
Old 10-28-2013, 02:32 PM
  #3642  
Registered
Gold Member
 
PROWRENCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: LAINGSBURG/TORCH LAKE MI
Posts: 463
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I've been having this same battle, thinking about putting 525's in the 300, or just buying a faster boat. As stated, I think it's probably smarter to leave well enough alone in order to not lose your a$$ when selling. The value added is only to you when you still own it. If I can do it for less than 10 grand though I still might because 90 is way better than 80!
PROWRENCH is offline  
Old 10-28-2013, 08:13 PM
  #3643  
Registered
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,696
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

You can put raylar heads and cam and get close to 100 per side for less than 10k. The vyper test I read with 500efi went 86 in salt. Those are 470 HP. I think with 525 it would be close or at 90. Darin Morgan (he developed the Raylar heads at Profiler) said 65 hp with just changing the heads.

The chine walk worries me at that speed. I wish some one has put bigger power in and could provide some feedback.
Pwraddr is offline  
Old 10-29-2013, 08:08 AM
  #3644  
Registered
Gold Member
 
PROWRENCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: LAINGSBURG/TORCH LAKE MI
Posts: 463
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The problem is I don't trust the cast bottom end of the 496. Cranks, rods, pistons,...might as well go 525's. If I could find the same deal AJ did, and sell my HO's for the same as he did or maybe a little more since mine have half the hours, then it's less than 10k. Deals don't seem to come my way like that though usually.

There is definitely a concern with the vyper hull at 90 IMHO. Not putting it down in any way, but I have driven them at 80, and not even close to the stability of a 300. This is where the John Cosker design shines.
PROWRENCH is offline  
Old 10-29-2013, 09:00 AM
  #3645  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,216
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PROWRENCH
not even close to the stability of a 300. This is where the John Cosker design shines.
Which models did Cosker have a hand in developing? I thought it was only the SC series.
fantastixvoyage is offline  
Old 10-29-2013, 09:11 AM
  #3646  
Registered
Gold Member
 
PROWRENCH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: LAINGSBURG/TORCH LAKE MI
Posts: 463
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by fantastixvoyage
Which models did Cosker have a hand in developing? I thought it was only the SC series.
I thought it was only the 300. My understanding is PQ called him in when they couldn't get it right with the 300 raptor. I guess there are a couple raptors out there that were concepts and handled like crap.
PROWRENCH is offline  
Old 10-29-2013, 10:35 AM
  #3647  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: IL
Posts: 4,674
Received 233 Likes on 117 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fantastixvoyage
Which models did Cosker have a hand in developing? I thought it was only the SC series.
Originally Posted by PROWRENCH
I thought it was only the 300. My understanding is PQ called him in when they couldn't get it right with the 300 raptor. I guess there are a couple raptors out there that were concepts and handled like crap.
Yep,,that is correct...
PQ tried a couple of times with the Raptor and also the Predator and finally gave up and had Cosker come up with the twin step Revenge hull,,they did use the original deck..

the 340 and 380 did not start as a twin step hulls,,both straight V bottoms and back in 97/98 the added the step inserts in the molds..

I just think the 300 gives a great ride,,I would have to say for its size its the best riding boat PQ built..
boatnt is offline  
Old 10-29-2013, 10:41 AM
  #3648  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,216
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by boatnt
Yep,,that is correct...
PQ tried a couple of times with the Raptor and also the Predator and finally gave up and had Cosker come up with the twin step Revenge hull,,they did use the original deck..

the 340 and 380 did not start as a twin step hulls,,both straight V bottoms and back in 97/98 the added the step inserts in the molds..

I just think the 300 gives a great ride,,I would have to say for its size its the best riding boat PQ built..
Great info. Who did the 32SC and 28SC molds? Just curious, I like the boat.

Also, I noticed the 340 & 380 molds have the steps integrated in rather than inserts so it appears that maybe some molds were made later than 97/98? . Were there any handling issues with boats that came from the latest molds?
fantastixvoyage is offline  
Old 10-29-2013, 03:54 PM
  #3649  
Registered
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: IL
Posts: 4,674
Received 233 Likes on 117 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fantastixvoyage
Great info. Who did the 32SC and 28SC molds? Just curious, I like the boat.

Also, I noticed the 340 & 380 molds have the steps integrated in rather than inserts so it appears that maybe some molds were made later than 97/98? . Were there any handling issues with boats that came from the latest molds?
they only had one set of molds for each,,,,,the steps (inserts) were made and added to the straight V bottom molds to make the step versions..
boatnt is offline  
Old 10-30-2013, 04:09 PM
  #3650  
Registered
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sudbury Ontario
Posts: 2,771
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by PROWRENCH
I've been having this same battle, thinking about putting 525's in the 300, or just buying a faster boat. As stated, I think it's probably smarter to leave well enough alone in order to not lose your a$$ when selling. The value added is only to you when you still own it. If I can do it for less than 10 grand though I still might because 90 is way better than 80!
And don't forget, 38 is better than 30!
verbi69 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.