24 baja prop
#21
Registered
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I don't know theory for marine propellers, but since both water and air are fluids, I start from the basis for calculating an airplane propeller:
P=D**** x n*** x h** x A
P = power
D = diameter
n = revolutions
h = pitch
A = propeller face square
There are also some small things like viscosity... but for the comparison this is not important.
By this two examples I considered 6000 rpm for LS376/480 and ZF68A gearboxes:
a.) 15"x22" propeller and gearbox 1,583:1
b.) 15.6"x30" propeller and gearbox 2.04:1
Both times the result was the same power, but in case a.) it was only 80% of the speed from case b.)
Since boath resistance increases with speed, but at the same time there is less slip in b.), I can conclude that in cases b.) the final speed will be at least 4-6 mph higher.
Accelerations from case b.) are incomparable better to a.)
In case with 1.583:1 the LS376/480 engine make less torque on the propeller shaft than the Merc 8.1 HO with 1.5:1 and shaft speed of 3.790 rpm ,
but in case with 2.04:1 it has more torque than the Mercury 500 EFI with 1.5:1 and shaft speed of 2.941 rpm which it is smilarly to BB HO with 1.65:1. (Reggie solution for higher speed 1.5 vs 1.65?)
BB prop speeds:
3.700 rpm has BB (5000rpm) with 1.35:1
3.333 rpm with 1.5:1
3.030 rpm with 1.65
P=D**** x n*** x h** x A
P = power
D = diameter
n = revolutions
h = pitch
A = propeller face square
There are also some small things like viscosity... but for the comparison this is not important.
By this two examples I considered 6000 rpm for LS376/480 and ZF68A gearboxes:
a.) 15"x22" propeller and gearbox 1,583:1
b.) 15.6"x30" propeller and gearbox 2.04:1
Both times the result was the same power, but in case a.) it was only 80% of the speed from case b.)
Since boath resistance increases with speed, but at the same time there is less slip in b.), I can conclude that in cases b.) the final speed will be at least 4-6 mph higher.
Accelerations from case b.) are incomparable better to a.)
In case with 1.583:1 the LS376/480 engine make less torque on the propeller shaft than the Merc 8.1 HO with 1.5:1 and shaft speed of 3.790 rpm ,
but in case with 2.04:1 it has more torque than the Mercury 500 EFI with 1.5:1 and shaft speed of 2.941 rpm which it is smilarly to BB HO with 1.65:1. (Reggie solution for higher speed 1.5 vs 1.65?)
BB prop speeds:
3.700 rpm has BB (5000rpm) with 1.35:1
3.333 rpm with 1.5:1
3.030 rpm with 1.65
Last edited by plavutka; Yesterday at 12:33 AM.
#22
Registered
![Default](/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Unless you're using an aluminum LS block, the iron LS bare blocks weigh 200lbs with main caps and bolts.
Bare BBC blocks (Gen V/IV) weigh 220lbs with main caps and bolts.
Obviously the BBC iron heads and cranks weigh more, + the iron intake if it didn't have an aluminum. BBC iron manifolds will be a bit more as well...not sure what the new LS is using.
Everything else is pretty much the same weight for marine dressing.
You've maybe shaved off 200lbs ish.
Bare BBC blocks (Gen V/IV) weigh 220lbs with main caps and bolts.
Obviously the BBC iron heads and cranks weigh more, + the iron intake if it didn't have an aluminum. BBC iron manifolds will be a bit more as well...not sure what the new LS is using.
Everything else is pretty much the same weight for marine dressing.
You've maybe shaved off 200lbs ish.