Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Scarab
43' Thunder >

43' Thunder

Notices

43' Thunder

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-05-2014, 11:16 AM
  #31  
Registered
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,399
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default power

[ATTACH=CONFIG]519789[/ATTACH]
Attached Thumbnails 43' Thunder-enines-2.jpg  
adk61 is offline  
Old 03-10-2014, 12:29 PM
  #32  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Team Archer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Huntington Beach
Posts: 1,406
Received 399 Likes on 147 Posts
Default

use the number VI s much better choice the boat will plane faster with a higher X dimension that cave plate makes a big difference and you will go faster !!!!!!!!!!! That's what its all about !
Team Archer is offline  
Old 03-10-2014, 12:58 PM
  #33  
Registered
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,399
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I know Dan we spoke of this at great length... I have no choice as I have the 5's and can't afford the switch... however as I stated in prior conversations I have the 1" spacer/cav plate to run on the #5...
what my question is now, what prop would I run with 1.68:1 ratio and 1" above bottom with 10" standoff box??? 4 blade, 5 blade?? 6000 rpm is max I want to spin
adk61 is offline  
Old 03-10-2014, 02:51 PM
  #34  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Team Archer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Huntington Beach
Posts: 1,406
Received 399 Likes on 147 Posts
Default

On the 38 Staggered with 1,000 HP Natural with 1.62 wet #VIs We run Mercs 17.5d x 37p 5b to 6000 RPMs . Top speed that we have seen is 114 MPH The bullet is 1.5 inches above bottom and its on a rail you can let go of the wheel at 100 an it go's straight ahead !
Team Archer is offline  
Old 03-10-2014, 02:52 PM
  #35  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
Team Archer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Huntington Beach
Posts: 1,406
Received 399 Likes on 147 Posts
Default

With your weight and full cabin you will start at about a 17.5 d x 32 p 5 blade that's a nice starting point
Team Archer is offline  
Old 03-11-2014, 08:16 AM
  #36  
Registered
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,399
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Team Archer
With your weight and full cabin you will start at about a 17.5 d x 32 p 5 blade that's a nice starting point
that's a far cry from where hering said to go lol they put me at 17.5 x 40 x 18* rake in a 5 blade...
adk61 is offline  
Old 03-11-2014, 08:20 AM
  #37  
Registered
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,399
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

I'm running a 16.5 x 32 4 blade on 3As side by side @ 2" below and 35" apart now... stagger will be @ 21" apart and 1.5" above (no spacer) as suggested by you in earlier conversations...
adk61 is offline  
Old 03-11-2014, 09:18 AM
  #38  
Registered
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Palos heights, IL
Posts: 550
Received 17 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Sounds like a really cool project. If you are looking for a place for those VI's the back of my boat would love it. Good luck with the project, keep us updated
sonic700 is offline  
Old 03-11-2014, 11:18 AM
  #39  
Registered
 
hullofjustis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 1,103
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

my buddy went from 5's to wet sump 6's on his 38 flat deck and it ran 100.9 mph in the ocean with the 5's on it. same year different blower set up and inner cooler setup everything else was the same other than i believe there was much more weight added because of the psi blowers from 14:71's and the huge innercooler that was used. instead of a super chiller after that we could not get it to run over 96mph. i feel the fives are much faster but very difficult to get on plane with 5's because they have no negative trim and the high x dimension.
hullofjustis is offline  
Old 03-11-2014, 01:38 PM
  #40  
Registered
Platinum Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 2,399
Received 15 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

yes... 38 flat deck is not a Scarab thunder with a modified bottom and not staggered and so on and so on... Dan at Team Archer (Scarab Guru and creator of same) says I should expect 110++ with the configuration discussed in this thread... the boat runs in the 90's now with side by side 3As @ 2" down and a dead gear ratio... (1.33:1) .

one would think that staggering with #5s @ 21" spacing, 1.68:1 gear and 1.5" up on a 10" box should drastically change that number!!! lets hope so at least, so I can go into this project with some hope!! lol
adk61 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.