Go Back  Offshoreonly.com > Owners Forum > Sonic
Good Year/Bad Year? >

Good Year/Bad Year?

Notices

Good Year/Bad Year?

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-14-2008, 07:33 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
sleek1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Good Year/Bad Year?

2001 358 Sonic- can't remember when Sonic had something weird with their hulls. I remember people recommending certain years lay ups over others.
sleek1 is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 10:04 AM
  #2  
Forum Regulator
VIP Member
 
Sydwayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 23,874
Received 1,248 Likes on 541 Posts
Default

A couple 2003-ish boats had some issues as Sonic was working out the bugs with the Infusion (vacuum bagging) process. ALL of the 2003-ish boats with issues were fixed. No associated issues before or after.
Sydwayz is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 12:25 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
East Coast B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Lehigh Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Was the notched transom changed during this period?
East Coast B is offline  
Old 01-15-2008, 02:34 PM
  #4  
Forum Regulator
VIP Member
 
Sydwayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 23,874
Received 1,248 Likes on 541 Posts
Default

I don't know exact date off hand, but it could have been 2003-ish for the 358. Hugh can definitely help with that one.
Sydwayz is offline  
Old 01-16-2008, 10:07 AM
  #5  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Actually, the only "problem-children," were at the end of the First Derivative Era...'04 - '05. They were rushing the hulls through the laminating process, causing a variety of issues. If your hull is from those years, and it's OK, then it's OK. If it was a problem, then it's probably been remedied. The first Infusion 31 hulls were in mid-late '02, and were a bit lighter than previous lay-ups. The notch issues concernd the 358 model.
Hugh
hpoffshore is offline  
Old 01-16-2008, 12:13 PM
  #6  
Forum Regulator
VIP Member
 
Sydwayz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Worldwide
Posts: 23,874
Received 1,248 Likes on 541 Posts
Default

Thanks Hugh. When did the "fill in the notch" on the 358?
After Adam's boat?
Sydwayz is offline  
Old 01-16-2008, 08:44 PM
  #7  
Gold Member
Gold Member
 
sunchaser796's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Fort Lauderdale
Posts: 249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This biggest problem that Sonic had with there boats doing the infusion was thier boats were out of trim. 42 & 45 footers were and all nose heavy. If you watch the water break off from the sides, you will notice that the CG is way out. But it also sad that most Sonics have problems triming the nose out of the water. There is two Sonics, a 38' and a 42 ' that has that problem removed. The answer to resolving their problem for trimmon was going to the Konrad Drives.With the Konrads , you can feel the nose come out of the water. But 03 sounds about right.
sunchaser796 is offline  
Old 01-17-2008, 09:12 AM
  #8  
Platinum Member
Platinum Member
 
NJSONIC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hillsborough,NJ
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Sonic removed the notch from the 358 in 2002. This was done to eliminate porpoise.
NJSONIC is offline  
Old 01-17-2008, 09:30 AM
  #9  
Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Maryland
Posts: 441
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by sunchaser796
This biggest problem that Sonic had with there boats doing the infusion was thier boats were out of trim. 42 & 45 footers were and all nose heavy. If you watch the water break off from the sides, you will notice that the CG is way out. But it also sad that most Sonics have problems triming the nose out of the water. There is two Sonics, a 38' and a 42 ' that has that problem removed. The answer to resolving their problem for trimmon was going to the Konrad Drives.With the Konrads , you can feel the nose come out of the water. But 03 sounds about right.
Infusion had nothing to do with it...the 42 was always bow heavy, relative to the ability to provide bow-lift with two Bravo drives/available prop dia. The newest 42's with NXT's and 17"+ dia. props carry the bow very nicely while generating good speed. The 45, with it's longer running surface aft, and three props providing leverage and reasonable hp(500+) had no problem with bow lift to generate speed. The 386 didn't have any issues. NJSONIC is correct about the 358 notch changes.
hpoffshore is offline  
Old 01-17-2008, 11:11 AM
  #10  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
sleek1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 1,197
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the replies, however I am asking specifically about the 2001 358 hull. Is the 01 a good hull or are there issues? I've heard about the porpoising common with 35s. Is the porpoising really that bad or is this problem blown out of proportion? Secondly, is it such a big deal to use a little tab to stop the porpoising?
sleek1 is offline  


Quick Reply: Good Year/Bad Year?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.