Superbabi !! Heres your pics of your Y2K
#3831
Registered
#3832
Registered
Platinum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toms River, N,J
Posts: 5,878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#3834
Registered
Platinum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toms River, N,J
Posts: 5,878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#3835
arneson-industries.com
Offshoreonly Advertiser
If so, I have a new drive I have just completed designed for single engine 30' and less boats. Well, it can be used for more than that but for this situation.
You won't have to worry about it breaking.
You won't have to worry about it breaking.
#3836
Registered
Platinum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toms River, N,J
Posts: 5,878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Rik, could you go into detail a bit ? ( Photos ), or should I give you a call ??
#3838
arneson-industries.com
Offshoreonly Advertiser
They are coming off the horizontal today.
I made a new rudder housing that accepts a "Bravo" style propeller.
This will give anywhere from 10-15 degrees more rake than I could get out of a Speedmaster propeller and we all know the cost obstacle when dealing with the speedmaster propellers.
The Maximus will fit also and this propeller has 30 degrees of rake.
This will allow a smaller boat that does not/can not handle a Cleaver propeller to run an Arneson without being burdened by a cleaver propeller.
The drive will have:
Less Stern Lift
Less Side Loading
Reduced Listing
Lower, FAR lower propeller cost and sourcing
Less "Man Handling" from the propeller
More Bow Lift
Less RPM to get on plane
Wider selection of propellers
Lighter propeller (if that matters)
Improved reversing, as the blade is not so blunt in the rear
Better tracking
More Propeller Rake. 25-30 degrees vs 15 for a Mercury Speedmaster.
For a small, or single engine application, this was an issue to some degree depending upon who's hull was being used. The propeller cost and selection was always an issue. Now with the high rake Maximus, the Bravo and others the advancement of technology has allowed us to take advantage of it.
I made a new rudder housing that accepts a "Bravo" style propeller.
This will give anywhere from 10-15 degrees more rake than I could get out of a Speedmaster propeller and we all know the cost obstacle when dealing with the speedmaster propellers.
The Maximus will fit also and this propeller has 30 degrees of rake.
This will allow a smaller boat that does not/can not handle a Cleaver propeller to run an Arneson without being burdened by a cleaver propeller.
The drive will have:
Less Stern Lift
Less Side Loading
Reduced Listing
Lower, FAR lower propeller cost and sourcing
Less "Man Handling" from the propeller
More Bow Lift
Less RPM to get on plane
Wider selection of propellers
Lighter propeller (if that matters)
Improved reversing, as the blade is not so blunt in the rear
Better tracking
More Propeller Rake. 25-30 degrees vs 15 for a Mercury Speedmaster.
For a small, or single engine application, this was an issue to some degree depending upon who's hull was being used. The propeller cost and selection was always an issue. Now with the high rake Maximus, the Bravo and others the advancement of technology has allowed us to take advantage of it.
#3840
Registered
Platinum Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toms River, N,J
Posts: 5,878
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts